 |
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
So if we don't see anything, it must be there? |
Please point to the part of my post where I said anything to this effect, or, barring that, please quit with the strawmen.
quote: Somehow I expected better. |
Somehow I expected that you wouldn't have immediately resorted to jibes. Such is life.
quote: More intact families is partial evidence that things were much better back then. |
I'd hardly take that as a given. From personal experience, it is nearly impossible to estimate how "good" somebody's family life is based solely on whether or not their parents are divorced -- it's incredibly presumptuous to assume that a "broken family" is necessarily inferior to an "unbroken family," even on average.
quote: As for the abortion rate, don't go there loinburger. In the absence of evidence, all you can conclude is that abortion has increased 10 fold since legalised. |
Sure, clearly doctors were faithfully reporting all of the illegal abortions that they performed, so the statistics must be correct... 
quote: Finally, look at teenage pregnancy rates? Do they not skyrocket after the 60's? |
You didn't even read my post, did you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
I'd hardly take that as a given. From personal experience, it is nearly impossible to estimate how "good" somebody's family life is based solely on whether or not their parents are divorced -- it's incredibly presumptuous to assume that a "broken family" is necessarily inferior to an "unbroken family," even on average.
|
the last point I will disagree with you on
it seems that nonbroken families are better _onaverage_
I am pretty sure that there were studies backing this up (it also seems highly logical)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
hmm
I have an idea for Iraq
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dom Pedro II
|
 |
The College of New Jersey
Nov 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
I think that it would be better to analyse it from the perspective of "back then" rather than now. I mean, today, if a family is not working, then there is a divorce. If the family is unbroken, its because it works.
Fifty years ago, however, quite often if the marriage wasn't working, they stayed together anyway. They did so because it was the social norm to do so. You should, therefore, if possible, try to find out how many of the families worked well, and then compare it with the number of unbroken families today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
You have to provide some evidence that women did these things to an extent comparable to the number of abortions today. I don't believe this is so. |
The point is that it is impossible, for all intents and purposes, to have accurate evidentiary support regarding the abortion rate circa 1950, since the data are innacurate (since abortions were not reported). The dataset is even worse than the data on the amount of alcohol consumption going on in, say, 1928, since there's no "Al Capone of abortion" whose bankbooks we can read (from which we can draw some rough conclusions on the amount of illegal activity going on).
quote: Do you have another standard? Lacking a perfect standard, we should go with an imperfect measure. |
Why is a measure necessary at all? Even were one to prove beyond any doubt that family life is more miserable now than it was fifty years ago, this would still not bely the root cause of this degredation. Why blame sexual liberation as opposed to, say, the fact that the Catholic Church no longer says its masses in Latin, or the advent of computer technology, or any other of the near-infinite number of changes that have occurred over the past fifty years? Measuring the inferiority/superiority of family life over the past fifty years will not help in this at all.
quote: Can you provide estimates for underreporting? |
'Course not. Unlike Prohibition, the amount of illegal activity cannot be accurately guessed at, owing to the decentralized nature of the crime being committed.
quote: Do you have anything to say about my teen pregnancy claim? |
It's throwing the cart before the horse. Did sexual liberation cause the teen pregnancies, or did it merely expose the problem of them? Did it cause the abortion rate to incraese, or did it merely expose the accurate abortion rate? Did the end of prohibition cause the drinking rate to increase, or did it merely cause the real drinking rate to be accurately reported? It's nearly impossible to determine cause-and-effect in a situation like this, especially when it is impossible to glean semi-accurate data from the evidence at hand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mr. President
[quote]Much of the rest of the world thinks we are depraved. I think they are right. [/quote[
I suppose strapping a bomb to your chest and expecting to be greeted by 72 virgins after your torso hits the pavement isn't depraved because the people who believe it come from the Third World? |
I am sure that you are trying to make a point here. Would you mind telling me what it is? What do suicide bombers have to do with "much of the rest of the world"? Do you think that much of the rest of the world straps bombs to their chest?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
Tuomerahu:
Thanks... I need to be more clear.
The Supreme court used data presented before them showing 'rampant' illegal abortion numbers to validate Roe v. Wade. There have been a number of analyses done on this submission, all confirming that these estimates are inflated.
It is not impossible to come up with an estimate...that's the point I'm trying to make, it has been done, and has been submitted before the Supreme Court of the US for evidence.
SCOTUS used evidence from Tietze, estimating illegal abortions at around 1 million per year, while a more accurate assessment authored by Dr. T. Hilgers from Creighton University, estimated the figure at or somewhere near 100,000 abortions annually in the U.S.
Last edited by Ben Kenobi on 01-04-2003 at 05:32
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Traianvs
|
 |
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
100 years ago there was no such thing as teen mother...cause being 16 , married and with kids was al right!
Oh, and wasn't the age of consent for many places as low as 12 just a few decades ago?
yup, those were the golden times of sexual purity, yeah sir, yup, not doubt, of course, .... |
Well these tendencies tend to surge and disappear again in time... Much of the purity comes from the nineenth-early twentieth century where chastity was an absolute virtue... sexuality is now becoming a more open issue etc but you'll see that it'll go back into a position where everything relating to sex will be forbidden...
I'm not saying the 40-50 period was a good age concerning this issue, because back then the man was still very superior to a woman, just check advertisements from the fifties... women were regarded a bit inferior to the money making man!!!
All that "opening the door for the lady" and all that meaningless behaviour (being exceptionally polite) to women originates frmo the middle ages, where women were regarded as "the cure" for their disease, which was love, and so they were treated like they were godesses, but in fact they had nothing to say...
Anyway that kind of being polite will disappear in time as well
But it will all come back, so why are people annoyed with all these teens having sex earlier and earlier... it'll go over in time!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Now I can say that underage sex and sex before marrage can bring a lot of problems, such as children born out wedlock and unwanted, STDs, and host of other things, but gencide? Were did this come from?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|