 |
Choose which civ we will play as!
This poll is closed. |
| Vikings |
   |
16 |
25.40% |
| Americans |
   |
1 |
1.59% |
| Chinese |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Carthaginians |
   |
2 |
3.17% |
| Koreans |
   |
4 |
6.35% |
| Germans |
   |
3 |
4.76% |
| Greeks |
   |
3 |
4.76% |
| Indians |
   |
1 |
1.59% |
| Babylonians |
   |
2 |
3.17% |
| Ottomans |
   |
1 |
1.59% |
| Romans |
   |
1 |
1.59% |
| Celts |
   |
4 |
6.35% |
| English |
   |
6 |
9.52% |
| Japanese |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Mongols |
   |
3 |
4.76% |
| Random |
   |
16 |
25.40% |
Abstain/Banana (don't care/my choice isn't here! ) |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
63 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:27
|
|
The discussion thread has been open long enough, and now it's time to vote. All options supported in the discussion are included here to vote for.
You have one vote, so choose the option you like best. After the poll is closed, a repoll will be done with all of the options here that get within 6 votes (10% of our membership) of the highest number of votes for any one choice.
The choices are as follows. The abbreviations in brackets refer to the civ traits allocated to that civ. Also included are the UUs of each civ.
How to make a random choice is yet to be determined.
Vikings (Mil, Exp) Berserk 6-2-1
Americans (Ind, Exp) F-15 8-4-6 Bombard 4 Rate of Fire 2
Chinese (Mil, Ind) Rider 4-4-3
Carthage (Ind, Comm) Numidian Mercenary 2-3-1
Korea (Com, Sci) Hwach'a 0-0-1 Bombard 12 Rate of Fire 1
Germany (Sci, Mil) Panzer 16-8-3
Greece (Sci, Comm) Hoplite 1-3-1
India (Rel, Comm) Elephant 4-3-2 (no resources needed)
Babylon (Rel, Sci) Bowmen 2-2-1
Ottomans (Sci, Ind) Sipahi 8-3-3-
Rome (Mil, Comm) Legion 3-3-1
Celts (Mil, Rel) Gallic Swordsman 3-2-2
English (Exp, Comm) Man O' War 3-2-4 Bombard 3 Rate of Fire 2
Japan (Mil, Rel) Samurai 4-4-2
Random
Mongols (Mil, Exp) Keshik 4-2-2 (No Iron needed, crosses Mts as plains)
5 days....
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Inverse Icarus
|
 |
flying too low to the ground
May 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Aidun
CELTS, that's also nice for the warmongers.
Aidun |
the celtic unit is far overrated, in my opinion.
first off, it's cost is too expensive at such an early part of the game.
second, if we don't get iron, we'll have to scramble for it.
third, our golden age will come far too early.
fourth, the celtic unit becomes obsolete rather quickly (feudalism).
The Berzerk is 6.2.1 amphibious, no resources. sure, they're expensive, but they come at the beginning of the middle ages, where our cities are going to be growing rapidly. also, they last a lot longer than the galliac warror, as Berzerks are an even match for RIFLEMEN. every defensive unit before that it TOAST.
amphibious is also not to be overlooked, it comes in handy more than you would think, simply because mariens in civ3 suck ass 
having an amphibious unit that mops the floor with defenders is freaking awesome! you can penetrate deep into enemy territory and sieze valuable coastal cities the same turn the war starts! ugh! BERSERKIR!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
Random.
I think we can already see what the run-off options will be (Vikings, Celts, Random). Could we specify the random selection process? Like what civs or traits to exclude and how the pick will be made.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nor Me
|
|
Vikings sound good. They'd be too easy if we don't have an archipelago though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:27
|
|
Definitely the Vikings. Since getting PTW, I've had my most enjoyable games as them (or even as Carthage).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sean
|
|
Auckland, New Zealand.
Jan 2001 time: 05:27
|
|
English or Random.
Sean.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|