 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:27
|
|
The Five-Star Ranks
During World War II, the need was perceived for a General and Fleet Officer rank above that of General and Admiral, primarily to provide a level of parity with the British and German "Field Marshal" and "Admiral of the Fleet". Congress created the Army rank of "General of the Army" and the Navy rank of "Fleet Admiral". The use of five-star ranks is restricted to war-time and the last promotions to the this level were as a result of World War II service. There are no longer any surviving Generals of the Army or Fleet Admirals (the last to die was Omar Bradley). The Army recipients were George C. Marshall, Douglas MacArthur, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Henry H. Arnold (re-designated General of the Air Force on May 7, 1949) and Omar N. Bradley. The Navy recipients were Chester W. Nimitz, William D. Leahy, Ernest J. King and William F. Halsey.
Note:
The grade of General of the Armies of the United States is associated with two officers in our history, George Washington and John J. Pershing, although only General Pershing actually held it.
After Washington's death, an Act of May 14, 1800, specifically authorized President Adams to suspend any further appointment to the office of General of the Armies of the United States, "having reference to economy and the good of the service." Although the office was not expressly referred to in any of the actions taken to reduce or disband forces that had been raised in contemplation of war with France, it ceased when it was not mentioned in the Act of March 16, 1802, which determined the peacetime military establishment.
Congress enacted legislation authorizing the grade of General of the Army on July 25, 1866, and on that date the new grade was conferred on Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant. The grade was recognized and continued in various acts until the Act of July 15, 1870, which contained the requirement that "the offices of general and lieutenant general shall continue until a vacancy shall exist in the same, and no longer, and when such vacancy shall occur in either of said offices shall become inoperative, and shall, by virtue of this act, from thence forward be held to be repealed."
William T. Sherman, Grant's successor as Commanding General of the Army, was appointed as General of the Army on March 4, 1869, and upon his retirement in February 1884 was placed on the retired list as General of the Army. Under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1885, authorizing the appointment of a "general of the Army on the retired list," this grade was also conferred on General Grant shortly before his death on July 23, 1885. The title ceased to exist as a grade of military rank at Sherman's death on February 14, 1891.
Sherman's successor was Lieutenant General Philip H. Sheridan, who could not be promoted to General of the Army because of the 1870 law. Congress, however, enacted legislation on June 1, 1888, shortly before Sheridan's death, that discontinued the grade of lieutenant general and merged it with that of General of the Army. The grade of General of the Army was conferred on Sheridan and was discontinued when he died, while still on active duty on August 5, 1888.
War Department General Orders No. 75, September 5, 1866, prescribed that the insignia for the newly authorized General of the Army grade would be four stars. General Grant wore this insignia, as did General Sherman until War Department General Orders No. 92, October 26, 1872, changed the insignia to two silver stars with the arms of the United States in gold between them. General Sherman, and later General Sheridan, wore the new insignia.
Congress revived the grade of General of the Armies of the United States by Public Law 45, approved September 3, 1919, to honor General John J. Pershing for his wartime service. He retired with that rank on September 13, 1924, and held it until his death on July 15, 1948. No other officer held this specific title until 1976, when President Ford posthumously appointed George Washington General of the Armies of the United States and specified that he would rank first among all officers of the Army, past and present.
When General Pershing was appointed General of the Armies, he continued to wear the four stars that he, as well as Generals Tasker H. Bliss and Peyton C. March, had adopted under the provisions of then current uniform regulations, which permitted them to prescribe the insignia denoting their grade. Army Regulations 600-35, Personnel: The Prescribed Uniform, October 12, 1921, and all subsequent editions during General Pershing's lifetime, made no mention of insignia for General of the Armies but prescribed that generals would wear four stars. General Pershing at no time wore more than four stars.
Following the establishment of the General of the Army grade on December 14, 1944, Army Regulations 600-35 were changed to prescribe that Generals of the Army would wear five stars. Although General Pershing continued to wear only four, he remained preeminent among all Army personnel, by virtue of Congressional action and Army Regulations governing rank and precedence, until his death on July 15, 1948.
http://www.amvets-ny.org/reference/...ignia_army.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
The term "field marshall" was first introduced by Napoleon I believe, and was used as a special reward to his best field commanders. Field Marshals received choice compensations and fiefdoms. Napoleon often used a somewhat unique command structure. While each division and corps had its own commanding general during battle Napoleon would often have a collection of his best generals with him at his command post. When he became inspired to devise a plan of attack he would select one of his general staff, explain his plan and then commission the man to gather the needed forces and lead them into battle, temporarily usurping the position of the units' usual commanders during the attack.
Due to the inherently aristocratic nature of the position of the field marshal the term was never adopted by the US military. European nations on the other hand ate it up long after Napoleon's death.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DAVOUT
|
 |
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sirotnikov
can someone explain in words the difference between the different kinds of ranks?
what's the difference between a general officer and a field grade officer and a company grade officer and warrant officers and non-comissioned officers? |
Sub-Lieutenant, Lieutenant, Captain (Company), Major (Batallion), Lieutenant-Colonel, Colonel (Regiment) are officers.
Sergeant, Quarter-master Sergeant, Master-sergeant are non-commissionned officers.
Generals command brigades, divisions, corps, armies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sirotnikov
can someone explain in words the difference between the different kinds of ranks?
what's the difference between a general officer and a field grade officer and a company grade officer and warrant officers and non-comissioned officers? |
Well, general officers are just what it says- rank bridagier general or above. There is also the term "flag rank" which refers to everything from Colonel and above. They were permitted to have their own standard bearer and flag. In Napoleon's day regiments were the only real permanent militery formations and were usually given their own regimental colors.
Field officers include everything from second lieutenants to lieutenant colonels. Like their name implies, when their units are in the field so are they.
Non-commisioned officers are corporals and sergeants. They're basically enlisted men who have the experience and time in grade to have advanced in rank. In the old days officers were considered to be "commissioned", serving voluntarily at the pleasure of their superiors. Unlike enlisted men they were permitted to resign when they wanted to. The term harks back to the days when only aristocrats and gentlemen could become officers, and as such were entitled to somewhat priviledged treatment. Non-commissioned officers obviously did not come from the same strata of society, and did not recieve the same priviledges.
Warrant officers are pretty rare these days. I think that they are sort of inbetween commissioned and non-commissioned ranks, generally being enlisted men serving in a capacity as a lieutenant, but not with the same priviledges and pay.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bearcat
|
|
Oregonia
Dec 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
Warrant officers are usually enlisted men who receive a warrant from either the President or Congress and advance beyond the enlisted grades, but aren't commissioned officers either.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|