 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
On the surface they have agred to pull out of Kirkuk but any attempt to put together a group of local leaders to run the area will have to include a strong Kurdish element.
The Turks have only themselves to blame. If they had allowed US troops through then it would have been US troops occupying these cities and the Peshmerga would have stayed in the background. As it is the Kurds have had a bigger role than would have otherwise been the case, and presumably a bigger influence on what happens next.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
To put it quite blantly, the Turks will massacre the Kurds. Again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Iraqi Kurds are more than 4 million
Turkey Kurds are more than 10 million
Turkey simply will do whatever it can to stop a kurdish state from being formed. And since it already has the weapons and noone is going to stop her it will do just that.
Now if the geostrategic importance of Turkey has fallen so much vis a vis the US that thelatter will support the Kurds, I find it a very remote possibility.
The best Kurds can hope for (for which I express my wholeheart solidarity) is a limited autonomy inside Iraq.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
of course they can choose not to "learn"...
others have done it with good results.
and I bet they will never learn untill they're free
20 million people is a lot of crowd.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
What is in your best interest is not what interests the Kurds.
They will have it no other way than self governance be that inside Iraq or as whatever else they can get.
If they choose to go all the way, they will be massacred (luckily you can't genocide dozens of millions of people so Turkey cannot make theproblem dissapear).
If they opt for that route, Turkey will invade, you will be in a jam since any bloodletting will fall on you. Not to speak about the stability of the region.
The most likely scenario is that kurds will get autonomy. That by itself is a huge step in their agonizing struggle to eventually get a state of their own, and their aspirations of course for the liberation of all their peoples in Turkey as well as Iraq.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
It isn't. And the fact that the geostrategic importance of Turkey has been lessened considerably since its Insirlik base to impose the no fly zone in Iraq is no longer needed by the US makes this an interesting divelopement indeed.
I highly doubt the Kurds will settle for a "citizenship". Most likely they won't accept anything less than autonomy. Which is good for the US given that they support you 100%. The more power they have, the more support they are going to be able to deliver to you.
Interesting divelopments indeed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
BTW and what concers the "economic viability" of an autonomous Kurdistan they don;t really need any help given their oil although I'm sure we can manage a massive financial help if they need it as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Of course, Turkey can invade at any time as long as it judges that its interests are at stake.
Given the widely recognized inexperience of their new moderately islamic government it can't be ruled out completely.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
If the Kurds behave themselves and follow US policy in the region then how long before Turkey gets added to the "axis of evil"?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|