 |
Should there be a Kurdish State?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
45 |
69.23% |
| No |
   |
16 |
24.62% |
| Only if there are banana plantations |
   |
4 |
6.15% |
| Total: |
65 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Does anyone have a map with said territory?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Thanks Ming.
So there're about half the size of Syria in Northern Iraq.
I don't think it will not be viable unless of course there're problems with the trade.
Just the oil it will have will make it quite a comfy place economically I'd imagine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
BTW the Kurds of Iraq really worship you. They have US flags flying along with theirs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
germanos
|
|
behind a firm ****, Rotterdam, NL
Apr 2002 time: 06:27
|
|
Yes, the Kurdish state must be.
First of all, the Kurds allready have a hard fought state in northern Iraq since the dramatic end of their uprising against the Iraqi central government in 1991.
It will be unwise to try to turn that back, let alone difficult to achieve. The Kurds will not be very happy if they get screwed again by foreign powers, and rightly so.
The turks should keep their mouths shut. They would do wise to allow kurdish representation in their own parliament, but instead they have chosen over and over again to jail the members of parliament that were elected in their own elections. Furthermore they should drop their rediculous hostile and oppressive attitude to the Kurds. They don't even allow them to speak their own language, which is just examplatory of the repression the Kurds have to suffer in Turkey.
What exactly the legal solution should be is difficult to say, but I guess the road that led to an independent East Timor could be an example, or possibly Iraq should become a Union of States (yes like the US), which could result in both the territorial integrity of Iraq as well as self-governance of the kurds.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
The Turks ruthlessly invaded the great land of Cyprus - so a part of Turkey should be given to the Kurds as that's equality!!!. If the Turks dont like it then they give the rest of Cyprus back to the magnificent people of Cyprus , sure - it'd take 100 years for it 'catch up' technology wise but Cypriots should have thier land back.
Cheers
Matt
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Rothy, the only problem is that the Turkish Cypriots may have something to say about that.
|
Actually they said it loud... but noone listened to them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
I understand that, but I don't think that it would be a far fetched notion that war will occur because of the future Kurdistan being landlocked and sitting on a goldmine. |
A port is not "salvation" if you can't protect it militarily too. And since you can't have sea trade while having your frigates firing at the enemy (needs to be some kind of calm) it is almost the same as not having a port. If you have good relations with even one neighboring country which has a port, you're ok.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
Quite correct Imran.... but it would make better viewing on TV than the formality that was Iraq.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
That doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|