 |
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kropotkin
In the Al Jazeera case I do see a point in doing so as they wouldn't get caught either way. The US has a interest to get greater control over the flow of information. It's easy to brush away as stupid anti-american propaganda. I'm not claiming that anyone gave that order. I'm just saying that it wouldn't suprise me. It will never be proven if that would be the case anyhow, so why bother really? |
MWHC just looks down wondering how... how could people think this crap.
yeah - that's why the US let 600 reporters along for the ride. This will control the flow of info. Complain about this when someone else opens up the battlefield to this level. And I still say those crews might have had a RPG. Did you SEE the crew that was killed??? did you? they could have had one!!!!!
Pretty stupid huh.
why not just hit them with a sniper? it would have been cheaper.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:27
|
|
I guess i didnt see that one. anyway, so what. i'm taking it they were located somewhere in the captial. if so what are they complaining about. it's a freakin war! what the heck do you think happens??
The US has killed more US people during this operation. Is this an order from above???
|
|
|  |
 |
|
My Wife Hates CIV
|
|
Michigan
Jan 1970 time: 05:27
|
|
'Three Al-Jazeera offices had been bombed by US recently: Kabul, Basrah and Baghdad. That begins to look like a conspiracy. '
i dunno - i think the US shot down 2 or 3 friendly aircraft the first few days. hmmm... i knew something was up!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
I haven't said that the attacks are part of a conspiracy, that troops have got to be tried for war crimes or US troops just really hate foreign reporters, these arguements are sort of silly since we only know a small fraction of whats going on. Equally silly are wild assertions that everythings fine and there's been no wrong doing here, we should just trust what the Pentagon/White House tell us. The most ridiculous are the ones who demand that those who are suspicious produce a motive as if those with only the barest glimpse of the events are at all in the position to do so. Its not necessary to have a motive before being suspicious of an event, rather motive is usually gleaned after suspicion leads to an investigation.
Some one screwed up royally here, 3 events in one day, all of them a little fishy and when put together the stink is overpowering. Either to dispell ugly allegations or confirm and punish misdeeds an open investigation should be in order here whatever you believe. Certainly we have a reason to be upset when officials give a description of the Palestine event that seems to be easily refuted by the available evidence.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
raghar
|
|
I wish somewhere else.
Oct 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
Lots of journalist are killed in really short time. What mesage it would express? There is a lot of journalist that would skip some informations, just because they are afraid of theirs hide.
TV and media are very socialized. They don't act on reason, but rather on common believ. I don't think that current common believ is hunt down all US soldiers and rip them appart for killing of journalists. Its rather I want sallary so I will write something more carefull. BBC crew wasn't killed. FOX staff is in its normal somewhat could I say deluded condition? Until major media would be repeatedly hit it would end with nothing serious for US officials.
At videotape coud be seen that tank has considerable delay before firing, so no accident.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|