 |
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002
time: 15:27
|
|
I think your comment which is present in Mad Monk's signature was enough-you stated, I believe, that killing an Israeli settler (or as you asked for it to be clarified, soldier), was not reprehensible.
Last edited by Zevico on 15-04-2003 at 18:04
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002
time: 15:27
|
|
quote:
Your comment merely reinforces my point: when israels crimes are exposed, the first line of defense is always to scream anti-semitism. |
BS.
- What crime dd you reveal here?
- Regarding the sig-I apologise then, although I still think that's a disgusting thing to think-you are saying their murder is okay.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002
time: 15:27
|
|
quote:
I think it is a disgusting thing that they are willing to be killed for land...
Look, if they were willing to leave without violence - Great! But I think they have shown pretty conclusively that they wont. |
Firstly, it doesn't matter whether they are against leaving or not. They could belong to Kach for all Israel cares, but if Israel removed the settlements, they would have to leave as well, by force if necessary (as has been shown before). That is not an excuse to kill them.
Secondly- I do not blame them for not wanting to leave in one sense; they did pay money for it, after all.
Thirdly- You are portraying this as if it were a war, settlers versus palestinians. It isn't. Settlers are civilians. That means that in a war, people are not meant to purposely target them. To compare them with a german soldier in ww2 and to state that it is a 'necessity' is ridiculous.
Last edited by Zevico on 16-04-2003 at 18:03
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-04-2003 11:24
|
|