 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
I'm not so sure - having a late golden age can really turn the tables when you're behind. Getting it at gunpowder isn't that much earlier, true, but it coincides nicely with the over ocean trade era - which is what the British empire was all about.
Also, the British Army was extremely small and (at the time of the Napoleonic wars) was only about 50% English - if you count the Indian sepoy battalions too, it's only about 10% English! The reason they won a lot of battles was not so much superior ability as better discipline and command and control. Without the right leaders they often got a right kicking.
I agree, the man-o-war is a naff Civ unit - but it does the job.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Naval Power
|
|
I'm thinking maybe a tank UU as they did have some of the first tanks. How bout it of course those were WW1 tanks and the tanks now are WW2.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord_Davinator
|
|
Kathmandu
Nov 2000 time: 10:57
|
|
The Gurkhas of course... thats what the English special unit should be... but then again I am from Nepal...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
When I first started with Civ3, I liked playing the English natch but soon realised that their UU was the biggest waste of space ever.
Some of the above suggestions for its replacement are interesting.
Gotta wonder if the testers ever tried playing with the English and actually reported back that the MOW was a useful unit...?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
The problem as I see it is that since it is 'England', UUs like a 'redcoat' aren't applicable because they were British, not English. Presumably this is also why Elizabeth is Monarch rather than Victoria.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Getting back to the UU heart of the thread - most colonizing nations had "ships of the line" at the time of the MoW. The biggest of these wasn`t English (Spanish, I believe). Here's my most recent idea for a new UU...
Whatever else happens, we have got
the Maxim gun
and they have not
How's about a Maxim gunner, not conscriptable, usual 1 movement, expensive but good defense? Kind of regular infantry but not requiring rubber. It's just an idea - feedback?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
Besides a superior navy, it was highly disciplined infantry that made England a force to be reckoned with. Either Musketman or Rifleman should be England's UU. +1/+1 or +0/+2 for att/def over the base unit.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|