 |
|
yavoon
|
|
how is this an interesting hypothetical?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
If tomorrow it 'leaked' that all major sports organizations (NHL, NBA, NFL, MLB, etc. etc.) had predetermined results, for suspense and 'entertainment purposes', would you still watch them? That is to say, the results are pre-determined (who won and who lost, and a rough idea of by what margin) but the actual athletes and such were still "real", obviously. |
No. This is the reason why I'm not a big gambling advocate and I believe that the NCAA (and the individual schools of course) needs to be ever vigilant in keeping gambling off campuses, and especially away from atheletes.
Kennesaw Mountain Landis might have had his issues, but he was dead-on correct when he asserted that gambling by players and managers would've destroyed the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Caesar the Great
you mean they aren't???
of course, i watch reruns of old games - sure i know the outcome but it doesn't really bother me, it loses something from the game, but its still very enjoyable to watch |
i agree with this too. especially the cal, stanford game with "the play". not only was it great to see elway drive back and put his team up it was equally great to see cal execute "the play" and win the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tinyp3nis
|
 |
compensate this!!
May 2002 time: 07:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
I just find it interesting that no one would watch pro-sports if they were scripted. I honestly can't understand what would be different between the two...especially if you've gone all these years 'not knowing about it'. |
Well, ming said the same thing effectively as I'm going to but anway. Believe it or not, sports is mostly about winning. Or maybe it's a great achievemt if the underdog gets even 3rd place. Obvious, yes? So basically you see bunch of guys jumping around working out the script. Whoever the winner is, they win because the others let them, not because they had a better game. Maybe you can't see it from their play , but you know it. If I didn't know, and couldn't tell, sure it wouldn't bother me at all. Besides, easiest way to get good looking game is when everyone is actually trying to win. Also, there are people who even watch dilbert, I bet there'll be some who will still watch. 
quote: Isn't it the Drama and athleticism that makes you watch, though? |
If that's why you watch... You really should watch pro wrestling, if you allready don't. I'm pretty sure even the commentators have the script, so they can direct the viewer to see what they are supposed to see, if the other guy is supposed to do something, and it ends up looking vague they will explain it and go with it anyway. One can only stomach certain amount of it thought, I wouldn't want every sport to be like that. It's not really a sport to be honest, more like show acrobatics. It does look fake however, but it still looks good. And the plots are just too much.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Would you play a MP civ game if you pre-determined who would win, and how? |
that describes every game of civ2 MP I've ever played.
As for the question, I'd still watch but not as much.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|