 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
I was just about to post this in the uni- or bi-polar world thread, but thought the discussion deserved its own thread....
I get the sense from these forums that there is an over-inflated sense of how important/fast-rising China is on the world stage. As far as I'm concerned, China still has a ways to go to even approach Britain or France in terms of power/influence on the world stage, or Japan or Germany in terms of global economic importance. They may well be the next big thing, but it seems to me that China becoming a really "big-thing" is extremely far into the future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
I dunno if 50 years is realistic. China is woefully behind the US, Britain, France, Japan, Germany and several other European coutries in the amount of foreign investment it has made, it's currency isn't even on the radar screen of global importance, aside from the nukes, it can't project military power anywhere except across its immediate borders, still has to make monumental strides towards having a middle class become the largest segment of its population, and is trying to move forward with a political system that is ultimately at lagerheads with the economic system it's trying to develop.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord_Davinator
|
|
Kathmandu
Nov 2000 time: 10:57
|
|
I could take longer... They have a rather weak navy and airforce compared to the US, and it is worthy to point out most of thier naval and air force units are not made in china as almost everything else... hehe
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: I dunno if 50 years is realistic. |
In 1950, Japan was third world country. In 2000 it was an economic power .
Compare 1953 South Korea with 2003 South Korea.
50 years is a long time in modern history . |
Granted, 50 years is a long time in modern history, but I definitely have to take exception with your examples.
In 1950, Japan was only a third world country because it had just had the living shi*t bombed out of it. During the Meiji restoration, Japan became a significant industrial power, and obviously developed a military quite capable of doing some serious damage on the world stage (without nukes, mind you). It's technological prowess may not have been up to western standards, but it wasn't that far behind.
As for South Korea, it is a better rags-to-riches story, but was done with a much more pro-market form of government than China that employed a fair degree of nationalistic fervor. Still, though SK is relatively prosperous today, it's way behind a number of countries in terms of economic and military importance.
I'm not saying that China isn't moving forward, and at a pretty good clip, just that I think they have a lot further to go than some others think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: It needs a middle class. Until it develops a base of consumers, it will never have an economy worth mentioning. |
I don't know about that. If they want to catch the US, then yes they do need a domestic middle class. However, you can certainly build "an economy worth mentioning" based mostly on exports; just look at the Japanese. |
Yeah, but Japan has a huge middle class, and even though it's not quite like the US, there's a good deal of domestic consumption.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
If China can achieve South Korea's level of prosperity, then it will easily surpass every other country in the world save for the US. The sheer size of China greatly augments any improvements it will make in the future. |
If China can achieve SK's level of prosperity across the board in 50 years, I'll be surprised.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:27
|
|
At current GDP growth rates, China will GDP equivalent of about US28,000 per capita in about 30 years. That's close to most western countries today.
But having a developed economy won't make it a superpower. Even having nukes doesn't make it a superpower.
China will need a bluewater navy. something it is only just beginning to develop. It needs an army and air force that can exert influence outside its boundaries, which it doesn't have right now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frogman
|
|
Its not going to take that long. China is the most significant economy in the world outside the US. The investment in China is enormous and the potential domestic market will transform asia. There is no doubt China in 10 years will be an economic superpower.
To be a true superpower, you need the military to back it up. Unlike the Soviets who spent beyond their means, the Chinese will be able to afford a superpower military and they certainly have the will and the manpower to achieve it. In 15 years, China will be a superpower to match the US.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
I Am Jeff
|
|
New Jersey
Feb 2002 time: 00:27
|
|
Look back farther when westeners first went to Japan. The government their decided to industrialize, and I think less then 50 years after the start of industrialization (maybe even as little as 25), they had a modern military and were able to defeat Russia. Although amount of time could be off, but I doubt it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
The Economist seems to be reporting China will catch up to us in about eight yearsa....
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|