 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
Much of Germany's problems stem from the upgrading of the East. Here's their economic outlook from the CIA world fact book:
"Germany's affluent and technologically powerful economy turned in a relatively weak performance throughout much of the 1990s. The modernization and integration of the eastern German economy continues to be a costly long-term problem, with annual transfers from west to east amounting to roughly $70 billion. Germany's ageing population, combined with high unemployment, has pushed social security outlays to a level exceeding contributions from workers. Structural rigidities in the labor market - including strict regulations on laying off workers and the setting of wages on a national basis - have made unemployment a chronic problem. Business and income tax cuts introduced in 2001 did not spare Germany from the impact of the downturn in international trade, and domestic demand faltered as unemployment began to rise. Growth in 2002 again fell short of 1%. Corporate restructuring and growing capital markets are setting the foundations that could allow Germany to meet the long-term challenges of European economic integration and globalization, particularly if labor market rigidities are addressed. In the short run, however, the fall in government revenues and the rise in expenditures has brought the deficit close to the EU's 3% debt limit."
As for Spain:
"Spain's mixed capitalist economy supports a GDP that on a per capita basis is 80% that of the four leading West European economies. Its center-right government successfully worked to gain admission to the first group of countries launching the European single currency on 1 January 1999. The AZNAR administration has continued to advocate liberalization, privatization, and deregulation of the economy and has introduced some tax reforms to that end. Unemployment has been steadily falling under the AZNAR administration but remains high at 11.3%. The government intends to make further progress in changing labor laws and reforming pension schemes, which are key to the sustainability of both Spain's internal economic advances and its competitiveness in a single currency area. A general strike in mid-2002 reduced cooperation between labor and government. Adjusting to the monetary and other economic policies of an integrated Europe - and further reducing unemployment - will pose challenges to Spain over the next few years."
Doesn't look quite as rosy as Fez portrays, though certainly not dismal. But Spain's numbers in terms of GDP are waaaaay below Germany, and they don't have near the industrial base or labor pool that Germany has. Germany also has a significantly larger abundance of resources.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Giancarlo
|
 |
Los Angeles
Apr 2000 time: 02:27
|
|
I didn't paint it rosy, Boris. We got problems that we are going to overcome. I never brought up comparsions of the GDP, our population is smaller too... but Germany is in more trouble than we are.
Oh and you actually proved a point I was trying to make, from you quoting:
Germany:
quote: Structural rigidities in the labor market - including strict regulations on laying off workers and the setting of wages on a national basis - have made unemployment a chronic problem. |
Exactly what I was saying.
Last edited by Giancarlo on 30-04-2003 at 21:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
There are 2 dynamics at hand in the EU :
Former bad economies have a quite high growth rate (Spain, Portugal, Ireland) whereas former "good" economies suffer from low growth rates, especially Germany. It has to do with European harmonization of the economy within the one market.
However, there is a real beef that partly explain's EU discrepancies too : the monetary policy is common, and decided in Frankfurt's ECB, while the budget policy is still decided by individual states. It leads the EU in an absolute economic aberration, because States can only use the budget tool without deciding on the monetary tool.
The UK's monetary policy is independent, which gives the UK much more leeway when adjusting inflation or changing the pound's value. It leads to cohesive economic policies. IMHO, that's a main reason why the UK has a much faster growth than the other economies.
The only solution to that for the EU is either to scratch the Euro and come back to the previous fruitless and unfair competition, or to have a common budget at last.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
There are 2 dynamics at hand in the EU :
Former bad economies have a quite high growth rate (Spain, Portugal, Ireland) whereas former "good" economies suffer from low growth rates, especially Germany. It has to do with European harmonization of the economy within the one market.
However, there is a real beef that partly explain's EU discrepancies too : the monetary policy is common, and decided in Frankfurt's ECB, while the budget policy is still decided by individual states. It leads the EU in an absolute economic aberration, because States can only use the budget tool without deciding on the monetary tool.
The UK's monetary policy is independent, which gives the UK much more leeway when adjusting inflation or changing the pound's value. It leads to cohesive economic policies. IMHO, that's a main reason why the UK has a much faster growth than the other economies.
The only solution to that for the EU is either to scratch the Euro and come back to the previous fruitless and unfair competition, or to have a common budget at last. |
That is part of the dynamic. But also spain, port, ireland, are all moving towards more capitalist systems. UK moved there a while ago and is still there. Germany/France remained trapped in 70's social democracy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BeBro
|
 |
of the Krauts
Mar 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
BeBro : will Schröder apply the conclusions of the thinktank that designed "solutions" in spring 2002 ? I keep forgetting their names. |
If you mean the "Hartz-Konzept" for more employment, these were implemented, but they had only small changes
Currently the so-called "Agenda 2010" is discussed, which contains a variety of de-regulations, as well as cut-downs in spending money for social purposes (hmm, hope it is expressed somehow clearly ). There are also plans underway to reform the entire social system.
All these things are not easy to do, because they´ll mean financial losses for many. However, I think it is accepted by all that changes have to be made in order to fix our economy. In the long run, we will benefit from those changes, but currently the public discussion is about the details. The government plans to decide about those changes within the next months (June, IIRC)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:27
|
|
I wonder if Pekka's attitude is typical of the New Europe?
Regardless, I have no problem with a united European military and foreign policy, so long as it remains linked and cooperative with the US. We must remain allies and friends. The alternative makes no sense whatsoever, since we should be on the same page concerning the importance of advancing democracy and human rights in the world.
We should be partners for progress. We should air our differences privately, but have a common front when addressing the likes of Saddam Hussein. The public division we recently experience helped no one except Saddam.
Blair is incredibly right on this issue. Bush and people are so far holding their fire on Chirac and company. Bush has continued to say that France and its cabal are our friends and allies. Hopefully, Chirac will stop this foolishness about needing to set Europe up in opposition to the US.
I note that Bush and Blair cooperated extensively on everything on Iraq. Blair greatly influenced every decison and the basic strategy. His is the example that he urges on the other leaders of Europe. Chirac, Schroeder et al., need to follow this example, IMHO. If they act in the same manner as Blair, they can help shape US policy and US actions.
This is what they really want, I believe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:27
|
|
The problem is that they want to have their little play, and don't let us play too. This is definitely anti-US alliance and nothing else. And how will this strengthen NATO? All I see is Chewbacca-defense. We need to have mutual interest to be able to create working inner circle, and as we know how it is, it will never happen.
Maybe we should send telefax to them and say 'we have decided to be your defense'.
I don't know what other countries think of this, but this will never work this way! And excluding UK from inner circle? YEAH, BLOODY GOOD IDEA MATE!
We ALL know that the French and Germans are trying to be the only voice of Europe, pushing their agendas in the name of EU. I mean everyone knows it, doesn't matter if you say 'it is not against NATO' when it clearly is. This is attempt to be independent from US military power, but with what cost? And who runs the show? The opposite of them? NEVER!
They must be out of their bloody minds to think that we will ever allow our own defense and security be based on their little game. We want to have good alliance and defense, but we want to be in it too. They can't just decide themselves to be the leaders of this. Luckily they can't make us part of their dirty circle of anti-US, anti-NATO. I don't care if Chriac still has some investments in God knows where, but he is stupid to make a mistake to believe that we actually would be thrilled of this. I am glad that even once in your lives our hippie foreign minister is 100% against this.
Someone should tell these guys clearly and it seems like loudly enough too, that they can get the hell out of the EU if they think EU is there for them to play with. EU is our thing, all members are equal. We are not their toys so they can feel powerful.
In here, people don't want to join NATO that much. Why? Because it would cost lots of money, and it would mean 'going to someone elses wars'. But we like the idea of being in the same table where decisions are made. THat's what we like. Why in earth would we EVER go for this, where we can't even be in the same table?
No one can makes do anything we don't want, least these sissies. If they want to do something about it, I suggest getting ready to surrender.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|