 |
| |
|
|
rah
|
|
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
|
 |
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970
time: 23:27
|
|
Granted that this is reported in a US newspaper, but it does make you wonder. Everyone is so eager to heap abuse on the US, just maybe, All of it is not justified. Even though I'll be the first to admit that some of it is. 
I'm sure the truth is somewhere in between.
***************************
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...tionworld%2Dhed
Most museum artifacts found
U.S. says only 38--not 170,000--missing
By Christine Spolar
Tribune foreign correspondent
Published May 5, 2003
BAGHDAD -- The vast majority of antiquities feared stolen or broken have been found inside the National Museum in Baghdad, according to American investigators who compiled an inventory over the weekend of the ransacked galleries.
A total of 38 pieces, not tens of thousands, are now believed to be missing. Among them is a display of Babylonian cuneiform tablets that accounts for nine missing items.
The most valuable missing piece is the Vase of Warka, a white limestone bowl dating from 3000 B.C.
The inventory, compiled by a military and civilian team headed by Marine Col. Matthew Bogdanos, rejects reports that Iraq's renowned treasures of civilization--up to 170,000 artifacts--had been lost during the U.S.-led war against Iraq. It also raises questions about why any of the artifacts were reported missing.
The looting seems to have occurred April 10-12, two days after museum officials fled the grounds amid a battle in which Fedayeen Saddam gunners entered the complex and began firing on advancing U.S. tanks.
In one instance, investigators found that intruders had taken some less-valuable artifacts from a storage room in the basement of the museum. That theft, in a little-known storage area, has raised suspicions that the thieves had knowledge of the museum and its storage practices.
Investigators armed with chisels and a sledgehammer broke through hastily constructed barricades Saturday to search several large storage rooms in the museum.
In one storage area on the second floor, they discovered evidence of a gunner's nest. From debris left behind, investigators concluded that a gunner was armed with an assault rifle and rocket-propelled grenades.
About a foot from the gunner's lookout was a hole punched through the wall by a 25 mm shell. Investigators surmised that the gunman fled after that single volley from allied forces.
Damage to the museum's administrative offices was extensive, with desks, wiring, fixtures and chairs hauled out by looters. Artifacts, apparently obscured in some instances by the rubble left by looters, emerged largely unscathed.
"There is no comparison in the level of destruction seen in the museum and that seen the administrative offices," Bogdanos said. "It's absolute wanton destruction in the offices. We didn't see anywhere near that destruction in the museum. [People] stole what they could use. ... They left the antiquities."
Investigators, compiling information about what occurred during the chaotic takeover of Baghdad by U.S.-led troops, are concluding that little damage occurred to antiquities displayed at the museum. Investigators counted 17 display cases destroyed out of 300 to 400 cases. Many of the items apparently were removed before the looting.
In addition, investigators have counted 22 items that were damaged, including 11 clay pots on display in corridors. Most of those damaged artifacts are restored pieces and can be restored again, museum officials told investigators.
The most significant of the damaged pieces was the Golden Harp of Ur. But investigators determined that the golden head on the damaged antiquity, feared missing, was only a copy. Museum officials confirmed this week to investigators that the original head had been placed in a storage vault at the Iraqi Central Bank before the war.
The inventory was compiled after investigators examined five large storage areas in the museum Saturday to check for looting. Each room was lined with shelves holding plastic containers filled with envelopes of small, less-valuable artifacts, such as beads or amulets.
There was no apparent sign of forced entry to the storage sites, and the doors were locked when investigators arrived. Museum staffers told investigators they had no keys to the room, so investigators remain uncertain how entry was made.
Investigators found that the basement storage area, which held thousands of small items not deemed suitable for display, had been disturbed in one of the rooms. They broke through a cinder-block barrier to the room to find hundreds of cardboard boxes intact and about 90 plastic boxes, containing about 5,000 less-valuable items, missing.
A boxful of such items was retrieved about a week ago near Al Kut, investigators said, and it is likely that the intruders are attempting to move other such artifacts outside Baghdad.
Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
DRoseDARs
|
 |
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002
time: 21:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ming
I still love how they still blame the US for the looting.
Sure, we could have protected things better... but the last time I checked, most of the looting was done by Iraqi... Yes... we were responsible for robbing their history, while Iragi were making money selling them... |
Funny, I don't recall blaming the Coalition for the looting, but blaming them for not doing more to prevent it. 
Obviously, if the Chicago Tribune article is accurate, then great.  However, that still doesn't excuse the lack of protection for the hospitals, universities, and the library.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
DRoseDARs
|
|
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002
time: 21:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by rah
While I'm not happy that the american forces didn't do enough to protect what should have been protected, I will say that the city fell much faster than anticipated and may have caught them off guard at first. And there was no way that there were enough troops to protect EVERYTHING. But more should have been done.
RAH |
I don't know if I buy the idea that it caught them off guard. The US went on-and-on about how military might would scare off the Iraqi military ("Shock and Awe") and the Iraqi people would welcome their "liberation," so they must've at least THOUGHT about, even made some preliminary plans for the possiblity that Ba'ath control would crumble like a sh*tty cookie. Contingency planning is always a must. If it comes to light that there really wasn't more than a few hundred troops within, say, 100 miles of Baghdad and those troops were mostly used to secure the three ministries, then that just further exemplifies the questionable planning done by Rummy.
And protecting EVERYTHING wasn't the point (for those who missed what was being critisized). I'm running on the assumption that large numbers of troops were within the vicinity of Baghdad, say 2,000, but were kept back...just in case. It should have been possible to protect a few key hospitals, the library that got burned out, and the major university or at least some buildings on the campus (I don't know how large or spread out it is).
Rah, at least we agree that more should have been done to protect a few (more) key installations and that not all of the looting city-wide could have been prevented.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-05-2003 22:37
Yeah I am sure they have been reading this forum all along...
.
.
|