 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
The man who wrote (or compiled I should say) "The Book of Virtues" is a big time gambler and moralising conservatives are defending him? Well, it's his money and his life! Yeah, and it's my money and my life if I want use drugs, look at porn, get drunk, solicit prostitutes, or engage in a variety of "vices". But gambling is legal they say. What does the legal status of an act have to do with morality? Sure, and enslaving other people was once legal too and it was illegal to help runaway slaves. If this was not Bennett, but, say, Bill Clinton who gambled away $8 million, would these apologists react the same way by defending him?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
Imran - quote: When did he ever say that gambling was immoral? |
He didn't that I know of, and? How convenient! Hey, you people are immoral because of your vices, but I won't include my vice of choice in my condemnation of you. My comments were directed at his conservative defenders. But, Bennett claims drug use, prostitution, and a number of "vices" are immoral, not because he can prove the accusation when dealing with a person who engages in these "vices" only; no, he says they are immoral because of what some who engage in these vices do to others.
It's the drug user who becomes addicted and steals to fuel the addiction. It's the married man who wrecks his marriage by soliciting prostitutes or his addiction to porn. It's the drunk that kills someone on the road. Many people engage in "vices" without hurting others, but he condemns them all anyway. When Bennett came out in opposition to the Nevada referendum on pot, he said more people will die in traffic accidents, i.e., pot smokers who don't drive under the influence are immoral and should be punished because of those who do. So why not hold Bennett accountable by his own standard? It's not that he can afford to gamble away millions, it's that others have bankrupted their families by gambling away the family assets. If all the other people who engage in "vices" are immoral and need to be punished because some of them hurt others, then Bennett, using his own standard, is immoral because some gamblers do hurt others.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
The man who wrote (or compiled I should say) "The Book of Virtues" is a big time gambler and moralising conservatives are defending him? Well, it's his money and his life! Yeah, and it's my money and my life if I want use drugs, look at porn, get drunk, solicit prostitutes, or engage in a variety of "vices". But gambling is legal they say. What does the legal status of an act have to do with morality? Sure, and enslaving other people was once legal too and it was illegal to help runaway slaves. If this was not Bennett, but, say, Bill Clinton who gambled away $8 million, would these apologists react the same way by defending him? |
Bennet is a Catholic, in which religion gambling is not a sin so long as you don't endanger your ability to provide for your family.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|