 |
|
Menlas
|
|
quote: Originally posted by My Wife Hates CIV
Who says NK has nukes?! well... they do and the US does. The US said Iraq had WMD. Oppps... looks like they dont. Never the less. That's no reason to not invade NK. might as well. |
Having the possibility for Tokyo and Seoul to be nuked is, IMO, a very good reason to try to avoid the war as much as we can.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
Support for the Saudis not a uniquely Bush quality. Clinton never made a peep against the repressive Saudi monarchy and ignored OBL, a prominent Saudi responisble for two major terrorists incidents during his presidency.
Fact is, we need their oil. By "we" I mean any American who is a consumer of oil, works for a company that uses oil, rides in any vehicle with oil,... - pretty much all of us. You can go right ahead and point that finger right back at yourself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
especially when they're not european or american, mm? too many of them thar people who speak asian, eh? 
the simple fact that forecasts for immediate casualties in the wake of hostilities breaking out in korea run from anywhere from one quarter of a million to over a million is a pretty good deterrent to military action in the area--and this is with utilizing conventional weapons only.
now, as for dealing with the damned north koreans...
sanctions won't work--i have a feeling it'll make them even more desperate, which is one of the last things we need. interdicting their shipments and searching them, however, might not be such a bad idea--they'll make noise, of course, but it'll be impossible for them to really respond in any substantive manner.
exerting lots of multilateral diplomatic pressure on them though might work--if we can get china and russia on board. china already seems to show signs of being embarrassed by their nkorean "allies", and are probably starting to see them more as a liability.
russia i don't have a good read on~ they'll probably want to help, because for them, the fewer nations on their borders who have nukes, the better...
i don't see nkorea selling nukes to terrorist organizations, however. they like to deal in cold hard currency or information trading, and thus far all the people they've dealt with have been states--rogue states, but states nonetheless.
what they might do, however, is sell it to another state actor (i.e., libya or some such), knowing full well the odds might be that those nations will then pass on the technology to said terrorist groups.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|