 |
|
PrinceBimz
|
|
One... the auto transport, I like that its a great idea. Can have some killer island hop battles like this! The only time I seen auto transport used was in Disciples and I liked it there too.
Two... the airports. Much easier to get all your planes to land or scamble etc. Alot better control over aircraft in RoN then how it is in EE.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
PrinceBimz
|
|
Let me add a third... How troops are created in groups of 3 men. That is better, armies look more realistic now because there are alot of troops on the field. If you build just 3 units of troops there will be 9 men out there. Battles get more bloody thats for sure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
albiedamned
|
|
Ellicott City, MD
Sep 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
I agree that the bonus resources are cool. But that also points out one aspect of Civ that definitely didn't make it into RoN: terrain types. Sure there are mountains, forests, and water, but other than that terrain is irrelevant. It makes no difference if you play on a desert map or a tropical jungle map - you can still plop down farms and gain food anywhere. You have to consider terrain a little bit when placing cities, but so far there seems to be plenty of forests and mountains so it's not too important. Strategic placement of cities, ie, building towards the enemy or taking advantage of chokepoints, is much more important. In Civ it's all about finding the best spot based on surrounding terrain and the resources that terrain can provide, which makes it more strategic in my opinion.
I'm not complaining or saying it should be in RoN, just pointing out the absence of it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MxM
|
 |
Planet Earth, Solar System
Jan 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by albiedamned
I agree that the bonus resources are cool. But that also points out one aspect of Civ that definitely didn't make it into RoN: terrain types. Sure there are mountains, forests, and water, but other than that terrain is irrelevant. It makes no difference if you play on a desert map or a tropical jungle map - you can still plop down farms and gain food anywhere. You have to consider terrain a little bit when placing cities, but so far there seems to be plenty of forests and mountains so it's not too important. Strategic placement of cities, ie, building towards the enemy or taking advantage of chokepoints, is much more important. In Civ it's all about finding the best spot based on surrounding terrain and the resources that terrain can provide, which makes it more strategic in my opinion.
I'm not complaining or saying it should be in RoN, just pointing out the absence of it. |
And I AM complaining. It would be nice if we had to take into concideration terain. May be in expansion pack ...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bhg_paul
|
|
Actually the "terrain types" are different in the sense that the map types have different amounts of the various resources. Some maps have less metal, some less timber, etc....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Yes I agree that the airplanes are much easier to controll. Anther thing I like, tanks are actually usefull and you want them in your army. Unlike EE were tanks were totaly useless. Also I think the graphics are much better then EE.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|