 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: By that merit, lets cut all public education funding period. All of it. |
Because that's EXACTLY what I said . Because public schooling and publically funded television are the same. |
Again, if theres a market for it, then it will survive. If it cannot survive in todays market, as Shi said, it must sink.
And PBS and public schools serve the same purpose. THEY TEACH. So if you say "Well, PBS can't be funded cause they don't have enough viewers" can easily be applied to public schools.
Bottom line: If students dont want to go to school, then public schools will fail. If people dont want to watch PBS, then it will fail. They both are educational, thats their primary reason for both of their existences.....
quote: Tassadar, when you've run out of arguments (as you just have) and start putting words into the mouths of others (ditto), then you've lost the debate . |
Attempting to downlplay your opponent through the standard "victory" speech is a red herring which is a debate fallacy.
Oops I won't mention that debating fallacies usually dilute someones arguement and cause them to lose.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Again, if theres a market for it, then it will survive. If it cannot survive in todays market, as Shi said, it must sink. |

Once again, putting words into someone else's mouth indicates you've lost.
This is why leftists will never win. They have such a simplistic view of things, they don't realize that public education and publically funded television are two seperate things .
quote: And PBS and public schools serve the same purpose. THEY TEACH. So if you say "Well, PBS can't be funded cause they don't have enough viewers" can easily be applied to public schools. |
Public schools teach useful things, which are needed for people in getting work. If PBS suddenly started to show lectures on computer science or something, then I'd start backing it. But PBS doesn't really teach. Most of its programming is elitist entertainment like operas, etc. The 'childrens programming' is a very, very small portion of their schedule.
quote: We already do have educational programing on TV which can survive the Market, check out History Channel, Discovery Channel, The Learning Channel, etc. The government does not need to subsidize educational TV. |
Ah, thank you .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: It's very cheap for every taxpayer, and provides so much in return. |
It doesn't do **** for me, and I don't consent to paying for it, and the price isn't really the point anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Once again, putting words into someone else's mouth indicates you've lost.
This is why leftists will never win. They have such a simplistic view of things, they don't realize that public education and publically funded television are two seperate things . |

We can't even debate the subject, so were resorting to "Well......You lost! Nya nya nya nya nya nya!!!". A red herring, a debate fallacy Thats ok Imran. I'm always really nice so I'll just let you off the hook. Come back if you want to debaet it.
quote: Public schools teach useful things, which are needed for people in getting work. If PBS suddenly started to show lectures on computer science or something, then I'd start backing it. But PBS doesn't really teach. Most of its programming is elitist entertainment like operas, etc. The 'childrens programming' is a very, very small portion of their schedule. |
Ok, then REFORM is needed. But to simply cut it off is NOT the thing to do.
Though I will admit, I haven't seen too much opera there....Maybe I just dont watch it at that time 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
The History Channel, TLC, discovery and so on do not compare to PBS:
first, the overall quality of porgraming is lower (Nature, Nova and other regular PBS science series are better) and only untl recently have they had the budgets to make anything as expensive as somehting like, lets say, Ken Burn's The Civil War. In fact, they still don;t have the money to do so. And as i said, on issues of news and things like Frontline, none of those channels come close. plus, there is the fact that PBS is free to all, and not costing 40 bucks a month to see.
The "school's" argument is a red herring. As i said, the Us spends more than any other industrialized state PER STUDENT (for example, NYC alone spends well over 2 billion on schools a year, while the most PBS ever got from the gov was maybe 500 million). The problem with public schools is not the amount of money, but how money is spent by the system. Add to this the nice little fact that money for public education at the elementary and secondary levels are all from state budgets, NOT FEDERAL< while PBS funding is FEDERAL, so again, the "public school's" argument is a red herring.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
I'm pretty sure PBS still gets money, though not as much as it used to. OTOH, much of the program PBS use to soley offer now has more outlets, though certainly not all
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui So instead you pour money into a channel that no one watches? What insanity! |
Just call me no one then. Of course, I pledge to one of my local PBS stations regularly anyway. BOth for the programming I watrch, and for others to benefit from the programs they want to watch.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
I don;t think TV is a worthwhile thing to use time in school for.
The problem with the history Channel is that thier writing is severely dumbed down, and I have noticed many writing errors.
The only way to get culturally enriching and genuinely educational TV without cable or satellite service is PBS, and even with these other networks, PBS is the best of them, with the best overall porgraming.
The issue for PBS is that since it does have to aim for a universal audience, it can;t just become totally specialized like a cable channel. It covers a very wide range of topics, and not just one (like History, Animal Planet, so forth). plus it is also able to stay away form things like trading spaces, and other themse programing.And as i said, if in the last year you saw just one show on PBS, you already got your moneys worth from it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|