 |
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
It's an orange alert! Do you know where your Tang is?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
Maybe next time they will try for England?
England has not yet been Hit.
We have our Canary Wharf Tower.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Q Cubed
does anybody know the history of the alert threat? as in, when it's been yellow, when it's been orange...?
what i honestly don't understand about the scale is why we even have "green" or "blue", because so long as this administration is in power, it'll always be at least yellow, and so long as we remain american, it's only logical to be at least yellow... |
IIRC, it's been orange 3 times. Once in September on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Once in Jan or Feb. And now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Based on what? |
What based on what? That there is a sympathizer field for islamist terror in the US?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
It will be delusional to say that there will be more attacks.
There will be attacks.
Not like Sept 11, and not daily "small" attacks like in Israel, but definitely similar to the medium sized Riad&Casablanca attacks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I wonder what sort of attack they will try to pull? Do they have anymore access to chemical or biological weapons? Could some have been smuggled out of Iraq before it fell? I doubt the latter. If Iraq had had significant stocks of NBC weapons surely they wouldn't have been able to transport the entire stock, inn whih case their should be at least some evidence left behind.
If NBC attacks aren't feasible then what? They've tried vehicular bombs here with results that were less than they had hoped, still, such weapons have been the stock in trade for Islamic terrorists for 30 years, so that might be what they try. Most of the good targets in Washington however are not easily reached by vehicular bombs. Most of the major Federal buildings (White House, Capitol, Supreme Court) are set back from the street and woul be insulated from a blast by distance.
Would they try hijacking airplanes again? Are the airlines adequately protected?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
One big truck/car bomb that blows up adjacent to an average sized residential building can take the building down. If the building has an underground parking lot and they can get in there, it will be even easier.
10 floors, 4 apartments per floor, 1 family of 5 per appartment, half of them home and you have 100 dead. And that doesnt include nearby bystanders, etc.
High rises may be well secured, but I dont think anyone will have problems with knocking down residential buildings, if the explosives are present.
Even with a relatively small number of dead, it will add a lot of fear since even homes wont be safe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"They've tried vehicular bombs here with results that were less than they had hoped"
Yes, but that's a wild card - as could be seen with a building in Oklahoma.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
"They've tried vehicular bombs here with results that were less than they had hoped"
Yes, but that's a wild card - as could be seen with a building in Oklahoma. |
Not only that.
The goal is not to kill, but to terrorize. Until now people knew that not getting close to landmarks like the White House, the Empire State Building, etc will keep them safe.
But what if residential complexes start blowing up? Then almost everyone will be in danger.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|