 |
|
Buckets
|
|
Play rated games when the patch comes out. People will be less inclined to quit.
People will, however, still be jerks. 'cheater', 'n00b', 'no rush', 'cheap', are sure signs you're dealing with a fragile mind.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Inverse Icarus
|
 |
flying too low to the ground
May 2001
time: 00:28
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Bridger
I actually like to stay in the game as long as i can like Uber KruX. Why? Because i know it's a whole lot of fun to finish off the enemy. It's kind of disapointing to play until the enemy captures 3 of your 5 cities and it's obvious he will win no matter what you do or how good you are, then he resigns and you don't get to finish him off 
Really wish there was an option to let the AI take over just so you can beat the crap out of it  |
 , it is fun to smash the AI with a pipe now and then 
i really wish the AI took over resigned people as well, from an allies standpoint. not only do you lose an entire player's army, you lose their entire economy, that portion of the map is essentially dead until conquered, and you cant take your allies land. you have to LET the opponent take the land, and then try to recapture it.
at least with the AI, some units are being made, and you have some control of them. you can also whine for resources from it i do that a lot, when i get stuck with one.
also, you'd be suprised how many seemingly "game ending" assaults end up flopping. you just have to be clever and resourceful.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
albiedamned
|
|
Ellicott City, MD
Sep 2001
time: 00:28
|
|
This has happened to me too (players quitting online at the first sign of trouble instead of fighting it out). I've been a little unclear on what exactly happens to their territory and resources. I'm usually playing 2v2 team games. When an opponent resigns, I just pretty much ignore his territory and march my army straight through to attack the other opponent and help my ally. Should I be conquering the resigned players cities instead?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
flash9286
|
|
do any of yall prey off other peoples kills i do. What i mean is when somebody invades someone and that person quit so all the land is left over ill send a small and take some cities for myself while the other person did all the killing
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Adagio
|
|
I haven't played this game online (yet), but I remember back in the days, as I often played Settlers III online, I often stayed in the game, even though my army was beaten a long time ago, since I'm always interested to see how the game ends 
When you play this game online, you're playing with a user registered to a certain keycode, right? Wouldn't it be a good idea, to keep a simple register, for all players? The register, should be avaliable for all to watch, and should contain:
How many games, the player has played
How many games, the player has won
How many games, the player has quit (Before his nation is destroyed)
...and such info...
Would be pretty simple, but of course, this only works, for them who plays offline
If a player is joining your game, you'll then have the option to kick that person, if he's got too many unfinished games...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hoju2
|
|
They have it now, although its broken. They do correctly show the correct number of games but not the wins/loss.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jasper
|
|
if you died and you know it show it
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28.
Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-05-2003 05:15
|
|