 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
I'm a strong willed man, but that doesn't make me masculinits (whatever), the same way my wife being strong willed doesn't make her a feminist.
(Who sayed I like her anyway? I just needed a date for my wedding.)
I am not gripping about the underminding of the white male, but I do gripe about that groups that continue to push for equality when there already is equality, and in doing so undermind personal freedoms and the boundaries of a "good cause".
By the way, in the military, is it less likely that a woman would be sent to the frontline?
The NAACP, IMO, has outlived is usefulness. They should turn into a scholarship/mentoring program (so that we can eliminate the AA) and many of their leaders should be given spots in ALU or any other department that oversees fair and/or equal opportunity programs. As it stands, they, like the feminist, are just a bunch of whinniners stumbling around in the darkness looking for some cause to keep them fighting... all the while coming of as racists, bigots, and sexists...
See, they're all just like me... hows that for equality?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
What about represenatives in Congress? 10% represenation for a 50% population. 1 female CEO in the Fortune 500. What equality? |
Now on this I disagree Imran. To me, the most important equality is that of opportunity, not result. I don;t think then one can measure equality by outcomes in such thing as congress. (one can point to increasingly sucessful womne in the judical branch, and in the cabinet, plus there is Pelosi in congress) After all,, for example, there has been only one catholic president, yet catholics ar the biggest single religious faction in the US: are we saying they are unequal?
I think equality should be judged by the opportunities available at the outset, and by the ability to advance. I think most of the barriers towards getting a woman in the white house have been removed. What is left is prejudice (of both men and women), which must be tackled in a differen way. After all, Pakistan had a womna leader, na d that says nothing about the position of Pakistani women v men.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
Imran: Oh, I see, your one of those equal success types who don't really understand what equal opportunity means... I can't help it if women aren't rising to the same stature of men, and would rather stay at home and nuture their husbands, children, and home. The only reason Hilary is as "great" of a political "leader" as she is is because her daughter is off and on her own, and husband ain't worth anyones time...
Men, are more "successful" at getting these positions, not because they are handed them on a silver platter, but because they are more willing to neglect all other responsibilities in their lives, and become workaholics... Something not too many women are good at.
Another thing, what are the age ranges of the rest of these fortune 500 presidents (did you bother to look at the board of directors of these companies, I know mine has several women on it), same with the US presidents... Why hasen't a women even vied for the presidency?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
Do any of you remember blackice? He was the main Canuck here who had men's rights as his big issues. Now Imran is certainly right that women have yet to be able to breach the highest levels of government, but blackice did have certain areas of concern where perhaps the pendulum swung the other way. They are if I recall:
1) The family court/divorce court system is unfair to men. Men have the odds stacked against them here and most times the woman will end up with the children and get a disproportinate amount of the property
2) Men are too easily made the victim of false criminal complaints such as sexual harrasment, spousal abuse, and rape. While no doubt serous problems when they do happen, women have been able to use false allegations of these at men who they want to get at, and too often false complaints of these things are believed.
3) Spousal abuse from the female partner directed against the male partner is ignored and trivialized by society. Many times the victim in this case cannot gain police intervention to help him. Furthermore, if a man's partner becomes violent against him, he is impeded from defending himself physically because then he will likely be facing spousal abuse charges where the femal partner will not.
4. The educational system is biased against male students. It teaches more to girl's learning styles, and treats boys harshly for well, being boys. As a result, female performence in academia has far exceeded male performance.
5. The movement known as political correctness has gone out of hand, limiting what men can do and say. An example of this would be a man who was forced to remove a picture of his wife in a swimsuit on his desk because it offended female colleauges. Men who violate this risk reprimand, sensitivity training, or even sexual harrasment charges.
6. Cultural concerns, probably not as important as the others. While we have seen a dramatic increase in the rights of women, responsibilites have not kept up with them. Men are still expected to pick up the check on dates, hold the door open, give up their seats for women, take care of physical labor for females, etc. So while many of the restrictions on female actions that accompanied the Victorian Era view of women have gone away, the responsibilites of men towards women have not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Jeez Che... that was a HELL of a rant! |
Anti-feminism really irritates me. Yes, some feminism is really whacky stuff, but we should condemn all of feminism for the ideas of a few only as much as we should condemn all Christians for the Branch Davidians, the Crusades, the Inquisistion, all Muslims for 9/11, all communists for Stalin, etc. McKinnon and Dworkin are minor giants, and have rather passed by by this generation of feminists.
Among the issues today's feminism is concerned with are: the conditions of sex workers, with the fun of sex and pornography, with not taking sh*t from anyone for being a woman. Today's feminism is more playful, more sexual, and a damned site more egalitarian than 2nd wave feminism.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 30-05-2003 at 21:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Do you have some empirical evidence that supports the notion that women are somehow less willing/able to make the same sacrifices in moving up in the world?
|
Do have emperical evidence of the contrary? No! It is impossible to take such a poll or make such an account. Yet, from what I've seen of women who do make it to positions of power they have made the same sacrifices as the men who have made it to that position. No family (or a really Sh!ty one), no home life, no realtionship (maybe a fling on the side), and no real life to speak of outside of work. From what I have seen of most women is that they want a family, home, relationship, and life outside of work more so than men. Men generally go bowling on Wednesday night, ditch out of ballet rehersals to go to a poker game with his buddies, and will gladly miss familly reunions for a trip the Bunny Ranch... It's in their nature!
I am sorry you had to agree with me on something GePap
quote: I agree that there are still plenty of sexist ideas, just as there are racist ideas, but changing these is bound to be slow without radical action, the sort of radical action not friendly to democracy. To me, removing the more obvious forms of descrimination, and punishing outright descrimination is the way to go, and in that we have succeeded greatly. |
I agree with though! Just look at Augusta golf thingy... Talk about a mans club... Radical action only caused them to clam up a little. Yet, now there is a woman who got onto the mens tour! and, what are they trying to do? Kick her off... I haven't seen a big stink raised by anyone like was raised by the chick for Augusta whinners... I don't know what to do about these situations, but to punish those who discriminate (of course Augusta is a private institution). Maybe not through radical demonstrations, but through political action. Maybe that would encourage more women to persue careers in politics instead of shaving their heads, driving a tow truck, and saying "men have it so easy". (How's that for a stereotype )
Address the solution... not the problem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003 time: 00:28
|
|
A couple of random thoughts:
A. Why do men want to have sex with twins anyway? Maybe other guys are different, but I only have one organ, and having to satisfy two women for no personal gain sounds like hell to me. With one woman and two men it might actually make sense, provided they were into weird orifices.
B. If your wife won't get you beer, switch to gin. It tastes just as foul but it gets you smashed much more quickly, so you only need the one drink you get from the fridge yourself. It's called innovative solutions. Tanq and tonic tastes better than any beer I've ever had, actually. Expand your horizons, you narrow-minded chauvinist blahblahblah...
C. Women may be less present in politics for more innocuous reasons, such as a lesser interest in screwing interns and secretaries, or less overbearing egotism. Certainly that's the only reason I can think of for entering a job that can't earn more than 200 grand a year, gets you *****ed at and criticized by the entire nation, costs you several million to get and that you may be fired from every couple years anyway for no good reason. What a pain in the rear.
D. No, even I don't know if I'm joking or not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Anti-feminism really irritates me. Yes, some feminism is really whacky stuff, but we should condemn all of feminism for the ideas of a few only as much as we should condemn all Christians for the Branch Davidians, the Crusades, the Inquisistion, all Muslims for 9/11, all communists for Stalin, etc. McKinnon and Dworkin are minor giants, and have rather passed by by this generation of feminists.
Today's feminism is concerned with the conditions of sex workers, with the fun of sex and pornography, with not taking sh*t from anyone for being a woman. Today's feminism is more playful, more sexual, and a damned site more egalitarian than 2nd wave feminism. |
Well put.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
blackice did have certain areas of concern where perhaps the pendulum swung the other way. They are if I recall:
1) The family court/divorce court system is unfair to men. Men have the odds stacked against them here and most times the woman will end up with the children and get a disproportinate amount of the property
|
In Canada, the pendulum is moving back towards the centre.
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
2) Men are too easily made the victim of false criminal complaints such as sexual harrasment, spousal abuse, and rape. While no doubt serous problems when they do happen, women have been able to use false allegations of these at men who they want to get at, and too often false complaints of these things are believed.
|
Not quite. When a woman makes a complaint, it is treated as any other complaint. The case goes to court and then is judged.
It's not any different than any other legal case. Let's say a shop owner says he was robbed and is shown a line up and picks out a suspect. That suspect might be completely innocent, but he will be charged and he'll end up in court. He might be found completely innocent. Does this mean the justice system is biased or faulty?
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
3) Spousal abuse from the female partner directed against the male partner is ignored and trivialized by society. Many times the victim in this case cannot gain police intervention to help him. Furthermore, if a man's partner becomes violent against him, he is impeded from defending himself physically because then he will likely be facing spousal abuse charges where the femal partner will not.
|
Blackice is right about this.
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
4. The educational system is biased against male students. It teaches more to girl's learning styles, and treats boys harshly for well, being boys. As a result, female performence in academia has far exceeded male performance.
|
That's just crazy.
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
5. The movement known as political correctness has gone out of hand, limiting what men can do and say. An example of this would be a man who was forced to remove a picture of his wife in a swimsuit on his desk because it offended female colleauges. Men who violate this risk reprimand, sensitivity training, or even sexual harrasment charges.
|
Any links to prove that example is true. Sounds like an urban legend to me.
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
6. Cultural concerns, probably not as important as the others. While we have seen a dramatic increase in the rights of women, responsibilites have not kept up with them. Men are still expected to pick up the check on dates, hold the door open, give up their seats for women, take care of physical labor for females, etc. So while many of the restrictions on female actions that accompanied the Victorian Era view of women have gone away, the responsibilites of men towards women have not. |
Wrong because you're making massive generalisation. The women who expect men to open the door or give up their seats do not understand the concept of equality.
The idea that men take care of physical labour for females is absolutely ****ing hilarious. Do you really believe that women do no physical labour. Do you believe that women never clean the house, cook meals, etc.
Come on, that's just ridiculous.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Has anyone ever considered that quite a few women really like to stay at home and raise kids rather than being a Fortune 500 executive or President?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|