 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
So I tried to go out to a club tonight with a couple of friends. Obviously, I'm not 21 yet, so I had a coupla drinks at home first - nothing major, like 2 shots or so.
So I walk into the place, get IDed and stamped and all that, and just as I'm going to pay some slut monkey stops me and asks how much I've had to drink. I just assume he smells it on me, so I'm honest and say "A little, maybe a couple of shots. Why?". And the guy says "Sorry, I can't let you in here - you're underage and have been drinking, and this is a public place."
I just say whatever, never heard of that one before but OK, and we leave, but that sorta pissed me off. What sort of stupid ****er does that ****, and what sorta stupid ****er would even enforce that, assuming it WAS a law?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
So I tried to go out to a club tonight with a couple of friends. Obviously, I'm not 21 yet, so I had a coupla drinks at home first - nothing major, like 2 shots or so.
So I walk into the place, get IDed and stamped and all that, and just as I'm going to pay some slut monkey stops me and asks how much I've had to drink. I just assume he smells it on me, so I'm honest and say "A little, maybe a couple of shots. Why?". And the guy says "Sorry, I can't let you in here - you're underage and have been drinking, and this is a public place."
I just say whatever, never heard of that one before but OK, and we leave, but that sorta pissed me off. What sort of stupid ****er does that ****, and what sorta stupid ****er would even enforce that, assuming it WAS a law? |
If you truely drank only a little.....Your body makes efficent use of the alchohol 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
Yeah, I truly had maybe a shot and a half of Jack over ice. Oh, and a small glass of plum wine. This was over about 2.5 hours.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: If they get inspected, and you're there, underage, and have alcohol on your breath, it's their liquor license that goes in the crapper. |
Actually I don't think that's accurate. AFAIK, in Texas, the TABC actually has to see them serving me in order to bust them. I could be wrong, but then again two of my friends who are bartenders told me that and have never heard of that law (which he said it was, DD), so I dunno.
DD, as to underage drunks stirring the place up, a)I was obviously not drunk, the people I was with, who hadn't been drinking couldn't believe anyone noticed b)why would they care anyway?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
WHAT? THIS IS INDEED VERY WEIRD.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
Well, the whole process of getting the age limit at 21 was sneaking around the consitution anyway. After the Vietnam War, many states decided they would lower the drinking age limit to 18, because if you can die for your country you should be able to drink a beer. So, what the federal government ended up doing was threatening to remove highway funding if they didn't raise the age limit. Of course, the state's citizens would still be paying the federal taxes that went into the federal funding for roads, and they would still have to maintain the roads, so not complying with the feds would mean having to pay for the same thing twice. So in a sense the feds used blackmail to usurp a power that they aren't constitutionally given.
Of course, that's not going to stop me from drinking anyway! Nor will it stop the vast majority of people my age from drinking, people will ignore this unjust law.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
DD, then that would explain why one of my non drinking friends smelled nothing, and my other non-drinking friend could barely detect it if I blew on his face.
My guess is that this guy was basically just an alcohol Nazi (read: slut monkey whoremongering bastard) who has kids and ascribes to the commie mommy theory that drinking "underage" is bad.
I guess my mistake was not popping an altoid, but other than breath there was no way my actions would have given away the fact that I had a drink.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Well, the whole process of getting the age limit at 21 was sneaking around the consitution anyway. After the Vietnam War, many states decided they would lower the drinking age limit to 18, because if you can die for your country you should be able to drink a beer. So, what the federal government ended up doing was threatening to remove highway funding if they didn't raise the age limit. Of course, the state's citizens would still be paying the federal taxes that went into the federal funding for roads, and they would still have to maintain the roads, so not complying with the feds would mean having to pay for the same thing twice. So in a sense the feds used blackmail to usurp a power that they aren't constitutionally given. |
Right, and the really odd thing is that the Supreme Court upheld this (IIRC) 7-2, on the reasoning that if the government could determine that the drinking age had ANYTHING to do with highways, it was a permissable restriction, while ignoring the issue of basic fairness and liberty.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
DD is right about the 5% thing, I was about to point that out as well.
Funny, you'd think additional alcohol sales would more than make up the 5%, but I guess it comes back to my commie mommy/fundie theory, at least in some states (well, commie mommies in the north, fundies in the south).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
SD v Dole, right?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
We debated that case briefly in my Con Law class a coupla years ago. As I recall, most people thought it was a crock of ****, but few people had actual arguments against it. Typical undergrad morons.
Not that it's a good decision, of course.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|