 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
the whole claims of right of return are jsut palestinian attempts to end the Israel state
no other group of refugees became so dominant )number wise) in comparison to thier initial state
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Yeah, I wondered about that. Would the Israelis be against compensation for lost property of Jews during Hitler's reign? |
Compensation? I don't think Israel has any problem with compensating the Palestinians (indeed it has offered compensation a number of times. And the American proposal in 2000, that Barak agreed to, offered compensation to all the Palestinians).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Israel has a duty to compensate those who left
but amking two palestinian states would be stupide and unfair to the jews
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
sounds good
a blanket compensation would be more though and would assist those who might have had better jobs and the like
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I mean compensation for every Palestinian who lost homes and businesses for the amount lost, not simply a blanket compensation to every person who is a Palestinian. |
IIRC, the amount of compensation (in the American proposal) was to be something like $30+ billion to cover all costs (such as bringing in Palestinians from countries like Syria and Iraq, etc) and including those compensations for homes, etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
A, this discussion, again.
The definition of Refugee is clear. Most of those individual you point to would not count as refugees under the given definition, specially those that left their homes in the 50's at times that no open hostilities were ongoing. If you care to argue about the fairness of the definition of refugee, lets go ahead.
But as I said to Edan earlier: if those Jews are labelled Refugees, then they would have the same rights and Arab states would have to either lest them back home or compensate them.
So I see no point of contention. |
but see, the arab states would just say, you can go back, which the jews would not want to do now, because it would mean the disolution of their state as well as persecution in the region they are returning to
the palestinians on the other hand, get money or the desolution of the israel state (and so money anyway)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jon Miller
but see, the arab states would just say, you can go back, which the jews would not want to do now, because it would mean the disolution of their state as well as persecution in the region they are returning to |
None of which does anything to change what people's rights are. If Jews were to return and be persecuted, then we would demand that Arabs stop violating the rights of their jewish minorities.
quote: the palestinians on the other hand, get money or the desolution of the israel state (and so money anyway)
Jon Miller |
The Palestinains refugees have the right to return or fair compensation. Nothing you have said makes that any different. As far as the "destruction" of Israel, well, that problem was born the day Jews decided to try to create a democratic AND jewish state in a land in which they were a minority. Only the fact that 750,000 palestinains became refugees allowed that state to be both Jewish and democratic, but the Palestinains always had the rights to return, a right ensrhined after the horror of WW2, which showed us what was possible when HR were thrown out the window.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
even though there are others who would help you with the costs. |
Yes, like the reperations that the Arab states will give to Israel for those Jewish refugees.
Oh, wait, not even I'm niave enough to think that they would do that...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
And here is the defintion:
quote: The Legal Definition of a Refugee
The law governing refugees and the processing of claims for refugee status is set out in the Refugee Act, 1996, as amended by section 11(1) of the Immigration Act, 1999 and by section 9 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act, 2000.
The legal definition of refugee as used in the Refugee Act, 1996, as amended, closely follows that of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and is a person who,
"owing to a well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his or her nationality and is unable, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his or her former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it, but does not include a person who
is receiving from organs or agencies of the United Nations (other than the High Commissioner) protection or assistance,
is recognised by the competent authorities of the country in which he or she has taken residence as having the rights and obligations which are attached to the possession of the nationality of that country,
has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes,
has committed a serious non-political crime outside the State prior to his or her arrival in the State or,
has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
[section 2 of the Refugee Act 1996, as amended]
"Membership of a particular social group" includes membership of a trade union and also includes membership of a group of persons whose defining characteristic is their belonging to the female or male sex or having a particular sexual orientation.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
You never know, Edan. They might do that (with US help). Where does that question remain? I assume that this has been solved with Egypt and Jordan? |
Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc. (And, of course, some Jews living in places like Hebron, etc)
I don't think there ever were any Jews in Jordan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
[QUOTEquote: The Legal Definition of a Refugee
The law governing refugees and the processing of claims for refugee status is set out in the Refugee Act, 1996 | [/QUOTE]
Well after 1948, then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Find the Jewish refugees (people meeting the definition as stated) and then you can talk about that. Otherwise this argument, as always (and defenders of Israel A;LWAYS bring it up), is a strawman. |
There were 800,000 of them. I'm sure finding some of them would be no problem, if you actually bothered to look.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|