 |
|  |
 |
|
Stefan Härtel
|
 |
Eddie's best friend
Jul 1999 time: 06:28
|
|
I looked at it and have some suggestions:
-I don't really like the fact that you lumped the Iranians, Syrians, Jordanians and Lebanese into one civ. Iranians and Lebanese would be OK, since Iran supports the militant Hizbollah party. But Syria and Iran have nothing in common. Jordan should be neutral in a way.
-Like yaroslav, I don't think every square should have railroads, there are far too many on this map.
-I know this is hard work, but this scenario would work better on a better/more accurate map and accurate city placings. I was never too fond of this map, and these city placements in particular.
The idea of placing the Palestine/Israel, Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts on one map is very ambitious and very hard work. In fact, there is no real connector between these three. Iraq and Palestine/Israel OK, but Afghanistan is totally different. I'm not saying it is impossible, but not easy to do without risking several inaccuracies.
In general, this topic is very, very risky. I'm not saying you shouldn't try yourself at it, but this is a very emotional topic, and you should definately make it form a neutral point of view. I think this would at least avoid any political discussions on this particular board, which, thankfully, haven't occured (at least to my knowing).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Patine
|
 |
Edmonton, Canada
Mar 2002 time: 22:28
|
|
Stefan Hartel, I appreciate your input greatly. I only lumped Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan together as I am limited, as you know, to seven players and couldn't find a better way to fit the countries of the region into factions without creating Barbarian states, which I seriously want to avoid. I will ponder perhaps another way of organizing countries. Also, I have tried to be neutral in my standpoint, but also to reflect what each nation is actually capable of militarily. The balance is very difficult to maintain. As for railroads, I initially wanted to reflect the feel in the news of the seeming rapid mobility of Middle Eastern warfare, but I now see I went a little overboard. I certainly would like a better map for my next revision; if someone knows of a map on the net somewhere of the Middle East that's better without including chunks of Europe or Subsaharan Africa, please direct me. I thank you for your interest. I'll address a revision perhaps after my current project (which you should be seeing soon).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stefan Härtel
|
 |
Eddie's best friend
Jul 1999 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: I only lumped Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan together as I am
limited, as you know, to seven players and couldn't find a better way to fit the countries of the region into factions
without creating Barbarian states, which I seriously want to avoid. |
Agreed. Maybe this point I had was a little unfair. I guess it's just my personal nature to comment on the representation of Iran in scenarios 
Here are some ideas:
If you'd agree to reduce the scenario to the Mideast only (that is, exclude Afghanistan), there's a good map somewhere out there. I recall seeing it by the name of Oriente or something like that. It includes everything from the Zagros mts to Turkey, excluding anything European, and including only fractions of Egypt and Saudi Arabia (IIRC, a bit of the Gulf is included, enough for any such purpose). It's also very large. In this case, I'd recommend following civs:
Israel
Iraq
Iran (maybe together with Lebanon)
Western powers/US/NATO (represented by Turkey, but maybe with bases in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf)
Neutrals (maybe Jordan and Egypt)
Syrians
Pro-Western states (propably Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait)
The CIS shouldn't be independent IMHO, maybe they could be included with the neutrals then.
quote: Also, I have tried to be neutral in my standpoint, but also to reflect what each nation is actually capable
of militarily. |
Don't get me wrong; I think the representation of the powers in your scenario was ok, and it was as neutral as it can get, I think, at least I didn't see any preferences.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|