 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Very little without cheap transportation to and from orbit.
It WOULD mean we could launch unmanned probes to explore nearby starsystems - but I can't see it being a colonization issue for another 50-100 years.
We can't even produce enclosed envionments on earth, let alone space. Being in space for even a few months has a drastic effect on the human condition.
We'll have to learn to crawl before we can walk or run.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Even 1mph faster than c and the travellers would arrive before they set off. |
I don't believe there is any reason to believe we can travel backwards in time. if we traveled faster than light in some relatively conventional way than we would be breaking relativity and most likely be working on a different understanding.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by St Leo
let you be the first
We had the technology to colonize Mars thirty years ago. The advancements in minituarization have only made it easier. |
I for one DON'T BELIEVE YOU.
Give us a few links to "Let's colonize Mars now!" links.
Or feel free to give us more hyperbole and I'll start posting the links that indicate we can't.
Up for it????
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DinoDoc
|
 |
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Of course, we all have been thinking about moving faster than light. We could also reduce the distance to be travelled instead, e.g. wormholes, | Well that introduces the added complication that you might not end up when you wanted rather than where you wanted.
Last edited by DinoDoc on 05-06-2003 at 09:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
We're going a bit OT here, talking about the mechanics rather than the effect on humanity.
One thing I would see happening is closer cooperation on space efforts. Everyone would want a slice of the eventual colonization pie, with the prospect of mineral rights in the medium term.
I don't think it would slow the arms race as such - but it would add a whole new area for it, which might slow other areas of that race.
Another application I can see is setting up deep space listening and monitoring posts like Hubble, well out of the gravity well of the Sun. Put enough far away enough, run continugous clocks on them and we'd have a radio telescope effectively light years wide!!!
Astrophysicists would go bananas over that - but it would take a long time to set up and years for the raw data to arrive, let alone being analysed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
You could never be completely out of the Sun's gravity well. The effect just drops as you get further away. What is the point of building a radio telescope out there? |
in all practical senses u can most definitely be out of the earth's gravitational well. if ur calculator is large enuff u might always get a #, but it would be irrelevant.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
You could never be completely out of the Sun's gravity well. The effect just drops as you get further away. What is the point of building a radio telescope out there? |
Building one wouldn't be that sensible - I was talking about a network, linked by a common clock.
It would give a FANTASTICALLY sensitive radio array. If someone made a mobile call from Alioth we'd pick it up. OK, that's an exagerattion, but you get my point - the wider the array, the better the data it produces.
Bear in mind, Urban, that 80% plus of matter is undeteced at the present time. We still have a lot to discover.
Putting such an array outside the solar system - with probes monitoring around a radius of a few hundred AU's or more - means we get less interference from the sun and especially from Planet Earth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|