 |
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:28
|
|
|
|
09-06-2003 03:20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|  |
|
World Bank:China to take over many industries including the Japanese auto industry.
|
Put an end to popups!
|
|
quote: Chinese competition will hurt Japan car firms: World Bank
SINGAPORE (Kyodo) Japan's automobile industry will shrink in the long run due to fierce competition from China, the World Bank said in a report released Thursday.
"Our analysis projects a contraction of automobile production in Japan and the newly industrializing economies," the World Bank said in its report "East Asia Integrates."
The 264-page report released by the World Bank's Singapore office says China's current plan to restructure its auto industry following its 2001 accession to the World Trade Organization is expected to make it a more efficient assembler of vehicles and eventually an exporter, leading to a contraction in production in other newly industrializing economies of the region as well as Japan.
"This prospect could provoke a major reorganization of the industry across the region," it says.
In addition, the report says China will also make inroads into Japan's position as a key center of production-sharing operations in East Asia.
It notes that although Japan will maintain its position as a hub, originating about one-third of all regional exports of components for assembly, "China is finding niches," with its exports of parts and components rising by almost $20 billion from 1996 to 2001.
Another sector to be hard hit is the textile and apparel industry. It says the garment industries in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong "will be squeezed," especially in the North America and European Union markets.
The report says the abolition of import quotas on Chinese textiles and apparel in key markets in 2005 will make China a formidable competitor.
It says the growth of these countries' textile exports to India and Southeast Asia, including to Vietnam and the Philippines, are also expected to drop as their garment industries are also hit by competition from China in third markets.
However, the report also says that a major impact of China's entry into the WTO is that China will become a more attractive location for Japanese investments, mainly because "some of the concerns about China's weak legal and administrative environment for foreign investment are likely to be addressed in line with WTO accession."
It says that overall, the industrialized and newly industrialized economies in East Asia will benefit from China's accession to the WTO.
The report does not take into account the expected impact of the SARS epidemic.
"We are currently viewing SARS as a temporary shock whose impact has been more on the demand side and therefore affected service, tourism, retail," said Homi Kharas, the World Bank's chief economist. "But it's much too early to think whether SARS has affected supply-side and investment decisions.
"Right now, that impact would be quite small compared with the demand-side impact."
The Japan Times: June 7, 2003
|
I don't always agree with the World Bank, but they are focusing on a real issue. Chinese industry is putting downward pressure on prices. It's going to get worse. The trade deficit between the US and China may tripple in the next decade.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
china is the reason why many korean companies, and less so japanese, german, dutch, and american companies are going upmarket with the electronics, as well as numerous other things.
until recently, korean companies often made knockoffs that were cheaper and easier to mass produce than the japanese sonys, but with lower quality; as soon as china started to look like it would do the same, it exerted such a pressure on korea that korean companies swiftly went upmarket, dropping the knockoff lines and investing fortunes in r&d.
that's why samsung isn't making b&w tvs anymore (when japan did that to the us, rca, et al stopped making b&w. then korea did it to japan, now it's china to korea).
it'll happen as more and more countries start exporting lower end goods, pushing everyone else further up or killing them in the process.
it might end up that in the future, owning an american--or even japanese-- car will be like how owning a british or german car is in the us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:28
|
|
quote: What about the next 5-10 years? 15 years is a long time. |
As Oerdin pointed out, the best cars built in China today are all foreign marks (Citroen, Renault, Buick, Ford, Jeep, Audi, BMW, MBZ, VW, Toyota, Lexus, etc). I think it will take a few years for domestic Chinese cars to catch up. In the meantime, I think Chinese trucks (at least in some categories) are already pretty good. Some buses as well.
This cycle has ocurred in other industries where the middle class has already created a huge demand: refrigerators, heater/air conditioners, washing machines, PCs, microwave ovens, large televisions (I don't think you can buy a new B&W set here). In these areas, the quality of domestic Chinese products is often quite good.
quote: I didn't even know China HAD an auto industry |
The number of brands is surprisingly high (I don't recall the exact number), but they tend to be smaller, regional brands. China is much more regionalized than most westerners realize. People in different parts of the country speak different languages, eat different foods, have different customs, have somewhat different styles of architecture, and ... drive different cars. It depends on what brands are built in your area.
For instance, in Shanghai you will see droves of Volkswagons and Buicks. In Wenzhou, in the next province to the south, the majority of cars are Renaults and Citroens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|