 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Not everyone is a born activist, and not everyone should be obligated to surrender survival for a chip at what's wrong. Many of these people have sh*t, and are simply trying to survive
As an old humanities Professor mimicked, a handful of well off knights running around old Europe demanding "allegiance to the just and logic sect of God's approval, on punishment of death!" aren't often going to receive much more than "Whu?" in sincere response from the average peasant, covered in dirt and rags.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
Most of the civilian, well-behaved, populace support the militants, freedom-fighters, and what have you. It's their "boys", i.e. equivalence of an army. It's the propaganda and indoctrination that tells them they're at war though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
Note: I don't actually believe this, I'm just posing this question for discussion amongst the posters.
I've seen the usual arguments that terrorists only represent a small portion of the population, and that most people are just regular working people trying to make a living.
If that is the case, why don't they stand up for what is right? Why do they allow terrorists, militants, and extremists to hijack their religion to justify genocide and murder? They should be on local media denouncing terrorists activities. They should make it well known that they do not support terrorism.
There have been reports of widespread terrorist funding by the civlilian population in muslim countries and muslims in other nations such as the U.S. Their entire religion was initially spread through warfare. Without warfare they would have no religion. They are encouraged to spread their religion through any means including warfare.
discuss
As for my opinion, I have to believe the muslim population is scared of the terrorists themselves. They fear consequences of standing up to the militants. The religious leaders lack the courage to change the focus of the religion from war to peace. The terrorists can be compared to gangs in some neighborhoods in the U.S. The residents are forced to put up with it, if they stand up for what is right, they will be killed. But it still bothers me all these muslim "charities" are fronts for supporting terrorists. There are still millions of people who want to see all jews and christians dead. |
There are many Americans who have been disgusted with the various genocides of Rwanda and Bosnia, yet they never actively did anything to protest such crimes against humanity.
Does this mean that those same Americans really support genocidal acts? No, it does not.
Same applies to Muslims who have not actively protested terrorist acts, even though they are not happy about such things.
Christianity in the Middle Ages was spread through violence and pillage, so does this mean that Christians today are evil because of what unrelated ancestors have done to other people? No, it does not mean that.
Same applies to Muslims today, who are probably sick and tired of being told they are responsible for the Arabian jihad of the late ancient era.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
If that is the case, why don't they stand up for what is right? Why do they allow terrorists, militants, and extremists to hijack their religion to justify genocide and murder? They should be on local media denouncing terrorists activities. They should make it well known that they do not support terrorism. |
Because you are equating passivity with active support.
Those with the guns tend to give the orders. Those without survive as best they can.
If you think I'm going to comment further on the culpable guilt of over a billion people, you must think I'm an arrogant bastard.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
Its only a tiny proportion of the Muslim population that are terrorists and members of terrorist organisations.
What is not in question is that many Muslims, probably the majority, support actions against the West. Nonetheless, they are entitled to an opinion, and that is about as bad as those that support the West's actions, and wish harm on Muslim populations and nations.
Having an opinion or a belief is not putting them at fault for the actions of the terrorists, an idea is not responsible for those that believe in it, and despite the popular support for terrorists, for various reasons, some of them very valid, we should differentiate between the two.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
I think they're all serious(w/in normal proportion) dissident.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
to be more in depth. I can't tell how many of these are american. but I don't think americans are as passive to anti americanism anymore.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vince278
|
|
1. We can't judge one culture by the standards of our own.
2. If the "silent majority" continues to be silent then they are perpetuating the problem.
Its amazing how little they seem to care about having their culture and religion hijacked. Until they stand up for themselves, their culture and religion will continue to be seen in a negative way. Their future is there for the taking if they dare.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
I don't think the muslim population is all innocent, or as peace-loving and scared as some would present them.
Many of them do feel a part of a muslim nation, and do want to defeat the west. If not to destroy it, at least to stop being defeated by it each and everytime.
Many of them do support terrorism and do think it's a good idea and do not make the same distinction between those who think up actions (govt.) who performs it (soldiers) and who supports or disaproves of it (innocent civilians).
In their eyes, if you really don't support your govt. you'd change sides to their side, convert and begin to actively fight your govt. giving them the winning edge.
The population is also under constant media encitement. The media is racist, lying, fabricating stories and so on. Forget claims about NYT or CNN fabricating stories. Forget commie claims about media control by US govt. What happens in Saudia or Iran or Syria is far far worse.
What some hot heads may deduce from my post is that I agree to targetting civilians. Well I don't. But I don't think they are as blameless as you might want to see them.
For some reason, many lefties think of the arab population to be somewhat like the western population of people who are too lame ass to vote or make a difference.
Well that, folkes is racism. The arab population is just as capable at raising heroes, leaders and revolutionaries. But the fact is, that the heroes and leaders that grow there, are usually racist, terrorist and fundamentalist.
Just because they don't prescribe to the western philosophy of revolutionaries and leaders, doesn't mean they aren't such.
The same was often said about the russian population of the soviet union. That they are either too lame or too scared or anything.
But the fact is, that it is untrue. The USSR population did believe in communism and in it's leaders and in their propoganda. They believed and followed whole heartedly and hated the west.
But ever since the 50s, the population of disillisioned began to grow more and more. There were human rights activists and pacifists, who not only weren't afraid to take a stand against the govt., but also took action against it, unlike many pretense muslim 'humanists' who speak alot to please the western ears, but do nothing.
And during the 70s and 80s the amount of people who were disilusioned grew to a large enough number that they eventually caused reform (Gorbachov) and later a revolution (Yeltzin).
Gorbachov and Yeltzin weren't exactly big demcrats or public doers. They merely sensed the public and knew that the public is against them, and that they have to ride the public opinion, to have a chance at staying in power.
During the 80s the soviet public had a critical mass of people who resisted their government's policy and politics and they changed that.
The muslim public, by large still believes in the ideals that are sold to them by bin laden.
Recent polls in the muslim world show that Bin Laden, and Yassir Arafat and Saddam Hussein are the most populat and are hugely popular. They have no emotional squabbles supporting murderors of innocent people, who abuse their own people.
The muslim culture, has sadly yet to grow up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
Just swayed to 11/12 - Voted No
I'm going to do an Essay, there is probably a Majority of Innocent Muslim's but this 'tiny minority' that people like to go on about is less tiny than they would like to beleive. People who i have before considered 'normal' suddenly surfaced a fanatical side when to come to the War in Iraq and actually voiced support for people such as Saddam.
Very few are active terrorists, but quite a few are supporting thier murderous few.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vince278
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sirotnikov
The muslim culture, has sadly yet to grow up. |
Cultural maturity is a problem many nations have and the disparity in maturity may be a root cause in much of the conflict in the world.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|