 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
dino:
quote: and because Lincoln left behind some decidedly pro-labor statements |
quote: As early as 1847 he had written, "To secure to each labourer the whole product of his labour, or as nearly as possible, is a most worthy object of any good government," |
quote: in 1860, he praised the right to strike, as then being exercised by the shoemakers of Lynn. His clear assertion of the labor theory of value in the 1861 message — "Labor is prior to, and . . . superior to capital" — and his answers to the addresses of workingmen abroad and at home gave a color of Marxism to his thinking. He was, surely, the best friend labor ever had in the White House. |
Simply put, it's true--Republicans were, at one time, Liberal and Democrats were, at one time, conservative . If you have issue with this, I recommend you pick up any fine history book and check it out for yourself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
which is why its fundementally bad for america shi. zealots and self serving capitalists are bad for america.
a theocratic run away "free" market
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Templar
Gee, if you had and used mass transit this wouldn't really be a problem would it?
|
And if you had functional mass transit systems, more people might use them.
quote:
Besides, what about letting the people exercise their right to assemble and petition the government for a redress? Those are constitutional -
The right to petition the government for a redress is nothing more than a right to communicate.
The right to assemble does not mean assemble anywhere, anytime, any way you feel is convenient, regardless of safety issues or infringement of other rights. If you're given a designated area to assemble, and choose to play games elsewhere to prove what a law ignoring badass you are, then you better make bail arrangements.
[quote]your "right" to a convenient commute is not guaranteed.
|
Actually, freedom to move about without unreasonable hindrance is implied in several "guaranteed" rights, and private citizens have no "right" to interfere with the lawful activities of anyone.
Better to **** them up if the weenies get out of line. If someone blocks me, they'd better have a lot of reinforcement, because if they don't get out of my way, they'll be eating pavement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
Sure. And I support their right to protest. And I don't give a fair damn if they're left wing protesters, right wing protesters, or what have you. I am an equal opportunity "Get out of my face, or I'll pound your ****ing face into the pavement" mean SOB when people try to jerk me around. 
I also support the right of authorities to reasonably control where they do it - not to get them out of sight, but to prevent them from deliberately interfere with others who aren't interested in their agenda.
In San Diego, when they had the '96 Republican National Convention at the SD Convention Center, local fuzz and the mayor (Golding, who had delusions of being a Republican candidate for Senate) designated a protest area blocks away and totally out of the traffic zone to and from the convention center area, when there was two sections of public park with nothing but grass right across the street. It would have been a perfectly usable space, but had the drawback of being visible to the convention and media. That type of restriction is BS, but keeping protesters from ****ing up traffic or local businesses is a whole different story.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by laurentius
Why are we anti-gm? Is it because we are being brainwashed by our goverment controlled media? Yeah, we don't have free press you know, yet. All we get to see on tv is our leaders hugging each other in solidarity, and some jolly-good marches for the goverment. We are so anxious to see what this new private madia is all about, does it mean we wont be seeing those music videos with singing children praising the state? No, I sure dont like the sound of that!
Why are we anti-gm? Is it because we let you test this food, before we put it to our mouths. It's called being cautious, I believe. Also many ppl don't like that food is patented to some individual company that-like microsoft- possibly wants ppl to pay annually for licensing their seeds.
|
As a leftist (American), I can tell you that this is utter, complete nonsense. They myth that GM foods aren't tested is simply false. Near as I can figure, this myth is an outright lie started by Greenpeace. GM foods in the market have been put through rigorous testing by the FDA and have been shown to be perfectly safe.
I'll repeat this: GM foods in the market have been thoroughly tested, and found to be completely safe.
As a humanitarian, I think GM foods are the key to saving humanity. It is estimated that such food have already saved a billion people from starving around the world, thanks to their higher yields and lower incidences of crop failure.
As an environmentalist, I believe GM foods are a key to having a cleaner environment, as they have been made to clean the atmosphere better than ordinary crops, and to prevent the typical damage and nutrient loss to the soil in which they are grown.
GM foods can help achieve many things that leftist have wanted to see for years. If it is a choice between Africans starving to death or eating GM foods, which do you think they would prefer?
Don't let anti-corporate attitudes (and believe me, I have a lot of them) blind you to the really powerful good GM foods can and do provide.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
The thing is most Americans understand how GM crops work and they know that 99% of it is totally safe and effective and that the government screens/tests all of the crops before they're released on the market. |
Actually, I doubt that's true. Most Americans have no clue about GM foods and aren't aware that most of our food supply is already GMed. We're talking about people who thnik WMDs have been found and that Iraq was behind 9/11. Americans are an ignorant bunch.
It is actually believed by the government that forcing food to be labeled GM in the US would hurt sales, which is why they don't require it, despite calls to do so, and despite that consumers have a right to know what goes into their food.
Least you think that corporations and the FDA look out for the consumer, remember, chicken and eggs weren't always a biohazard when raw. Not only that, but in many states, agricultural producers have gone as far as having laws passed which allow them to sue for damages if you present info that might hurt sales, regardless of whether or not it is true.
Not that I think GM foods are dangerous to anyone but small farmers who will be driven out of business by them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
GM foods in the market have been put through rigorous testing by the FDA and have been shown to be perfectly safe. |
The FDA is charged with promoting the interests of producers and consumers, not just consumers. Guess who gets the short end of the stick when it comes to conflicts of interest, the guys with the lobbyists or us regular schleps?
We are, after all, talking about an agency which allowed a hormone which has been banned in ever other industrialize nationa on Earth, BgH. Furthermore, it has outlawed milk producers from displaying "No BgH" on their milk containers, because that would give the impression that the hormone was dangerous to humans. It is, and it's hell on the cows too.
Now, do you think that an agency which not merely allows, but promotes, a dangerous hormone in our food would be all that careful with GM foods?
Again, I don't see GM foods as inherently dangerous, but they screw small farmers and will increase poverty in the Third World.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Has anyone thought about organizing citizen militias? If someone are bent on destroying my shop, you can sure bet I will take all necessary means to defend my property.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|