 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
Legions: I agree with Boco that we can consider Legion a defensive unit - it can defend a city or a strategic point alone.
But I don't understand why 4/3*1=172 . Some Scenario League trick?
About barracks - in fact I didn't want to debate about a moment when thay are useful. I wanted to say that the game (or rules.txt) is more interesting if you are not able to built barracks in time when you want to build them and therefore you have to discover the appropriate tech first.
And this is similar with marketplace, library.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rah
|
|
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
|
 |
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boco
Attacker
6a, 1h, 1f vs 3d, 2h, 1f -> ~55% chance of victory
3a, 2h, 1f vs 3d, 1h, 1f -> ~73%
|
I wasn't talking about defense, just the attacking portion. I don't use legions for defense, (well don't use them for anything) So I'd be more interested seeing the comparison above against identical defenseman.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowThinker
|
|
homeless, Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boco
I didn't pay close attention to the forum name when I posted. ST's got this thread crosslinked over half of Civ2 'Poly. Some of my reasoning for the Legion adjustment has to do with playing the AI. |
This is OK, I edited the first post now.
quote: 172 is a Sleague trick discovered long ago by W Keenan. |
Can it be used also for movement of 1 2/3 or 1/3 for example?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|