 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
strawmen?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Panda
|
|
Europe
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
What exactly are you trying to learn about? Do you want to learn about constitutional matters? If so, look at the standard A-level textbooks. Do you want international relations? Media studies? Politics and society? Political histories? General, or country-specific?
A good rule of thumb is to ignore any edition written before 1990 as completely outdated.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
I'm trying to learn different points of view than the lefty crap you get to hear in Europe.
Therefore, Americans less critical than Michael Moore and more conservative would be good sources.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion
as I have said, American realists would, due to their tendency to real politics, quite often be considered right wingers in Europe, the land of pacifist daydreaming and lefty-influenced welfare states. |
there are at least a few americans who are sympathetic to welfare states, but take a "hard line" on foreign policy. Youre most likely to find this viewpoint in the New Republic. Associated to some degree with third wayism, as in UK. But, like Blairism, these guys are easily outflanked on the left on domestic policy. **** Gephardt, who was pro-Iraq war, and is pro-national health insurance, may bring attention to this if he does well in Dem primaries.
Another neo-con whose articles are well worth reading is David Brooks. Find him in the Weekly Standard.
For a discussion of American viewpoint on foreign policy theres an article (book?) somewhere by Walter Russel Meade - who talks about 4 orientations - Hamiltonian (realist/mercantilist) Jeffersonian (isolationist/idealist) Wilsonian (multilateralist) and Jacksonian (nationalist/unilateralist) These labels have begun to make their way into US discourse, especially on the right, in the last couple of years, though i dont think Meade is a rightist.
I would note that there is an element of aggressive/wilsonianianism (again, think Blairism) that is on the center of US for pol opinion, but looks right wing to continental europe (despite fischers flirtation with it) This shades off into a more moderate right wing positions, both realist and neo-con - the more sensible neo-cons are not completley hostile to multilateralism. There is a nationalism/unilateralist element that hates multilateralism on principle, and i dont think your list captures that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
however, if there's a chance to read some of their articles online...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
in addition to paradise and power you might look at
" Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy"
Since its a collection essays by several righters, it may lead you to other thinkers you find more interesting. Kristol, like Kagan, is a neo-con, and so I presume most of the authors in the book are as well.
And since we're tossing around the term the neo-con alot, you might try the following:
"Neo-Conservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea"
by Irving Kristol, father of neo-con (and of William Kristol), former Trotskyite, widely admired and widely reviled.
Someone who is considered a centrist/liberal here, but is rightwing by Euroleftie standards, is New York Times colomnist Tom Friedman. His latest :
"Longitudes and Attitudes: Exploring the World After September 11 "
another liberal who may be a rightie by euro standards
Fareed Zakaria:
"The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad"
and multilateralist/realist Joseph Nye
"The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone "
and heres the name of the Walter Russel Meade book:
"Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How it Changed the World "
and a general background for understanding America - if you havent read De Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" you should - in addition to being very insightful about the American charecter, and some broader issues of politics and society, its very widely read among Americans who think seriously about politics, and looms in the background of much discussion.
oh and Max Boot seems to be influential among Neo-cons. see:
"The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power "
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|