 |
|  |
 |
|
Park Avenue
|
 |
Liberal and defender of freedoms for the people
Oct 1999 time: 05:28
|
|
The main argument I've seen is that when people of different genetic stocks breed, genetic illnesses, diseases and afflictions tend to be removed.
So, by allowing diversity in a nation, the policy implies that the quality of that nation's genetic stock will be maximised, creating a Master Race.
If that is the ultimate aim of diversity, to obtain a Master Race, how can those favouring immigration/diversity criticise other countries for wanting to keep - in their opinion - racially and ethnically pure. In their opinion, a similar ethnic stock might be the idea of top quality ethnic stock.
So the above discounts that theory of diversity.
Next are its downfalls. The vast majority of social problems in Western nations are due to the immigration of immigration and the lack of social cohesiveness that arises.
Indeed, many European states with their generous welfare reforms only work so well in some countries because it is a community. Everyone is the same colour. Everyone is dervied from the same/similar ancestors. Thus they are willing to help each other out at times at need. In a way, this is like the passing on of your genes, but in a macro sense.
Diversity offers no real benefits, and plenty of problems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
The main argument I've seen is that when people of different genetic stocks breed, genetic illnesses, diseases and afflictions tend to be removed.
|
Correlation; inbreeding causes birth defects. So non-diversity is definitely a BAD thing.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
So, by allowing diversity in a nation, the policy implies that the quality of that nation's genetic stock will be maximised, creating a Master Race.
|
No, it just helps stop us degenerating into a bunch of right wing morons with 2 heads and 12 fingers.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
If that is the ultimate aim of diversity, to obtain a Master Race, how can those favouring immigration/diversity criticise other countries for wanting to keep - in their opinion - racially and ethnically pure. In their opinion, a similar ethnic stock might be the idea of top quality ethnic stock.
|
Yes, but think along Darwin's lines. The fittest for any one environment flourish - the others do not. Having one basic type of human being is putting all your eggs in one basket, isn't it?
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
So the above discounts that theory of diversity.
|
My arse it does.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Next are its downfalls. The vast majority of social problems in Western nations are due to the immigration of immigration and the lack of social cohesiveness that arises.
|
I see. So the rest of history is a complete waste of time, and the fact that the rich countries have been exploiting the poor for so long is of no consequence. Crime is of no consequence. Social pressure caused by economic pressure is of no consequence. It's all down to the immigrants according to you.
You are a blind, simplistic fool.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Indeed, many European states with their generous welfare reforms only work so well in some countries because it is a community. Everyone is the same colour. Everyone is dervied from the same/similar ancestors. Thus they are willing to help each other out at times at need. In a way, this is like the passing on of your genes, but in a macro sense.
Diversity offers no real benefits, and plenty of problems. |
Great. How are we going to pay pensions without immigration?
Who is going to pay for YOU when you are an old fart?
No answers from the BNP there.
Move to Austria Bods.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Who is the considering whether something is a birth defect or not? To some nations, darker skin could be seen as more of a birth defect than having six fingers per hand, for example.
|
Tell me that when you're dying of skin cancer.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
By taking advantage of the demographic dividend we enjoy in such periods as between around 1963 and 1990 by having larger budget surplusses and smaller deficits in those period to pay for pensions in the future. |
We've had it, seen it, and spent it. Now find a real answer rather than saying "oh, we COULD have done things different".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zero
|
 |
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
That has always been my opinion. Also, there are cultures that are better and/or worse. There are also cultures that are roughly equal. |
just curious, how do you weigh the superiority/inferirority on each culture?
morality? efficiency? anti-semitism? (based on how close it is to ur native culture) etc... I personally base it on efficiency, which is why so many ppl mite have trouble with the ethics on my view..
Last edited by Zero on 21-06-2003 at 21:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:28
|
|
Interesting sidenote:
I did a self-evaluation at work recently, and one of the sections was a section on Diversity in the Workplace, and how I manage it. I thought for a minute, then X'd it out and put a big N/A over the whole section. When my boss and I went over everything, I told him that I thought emphasizing diversity in the workplace was "PC silliness", and that it had absolutely nothing to do with my job, or anyone's job performance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|