 |
|  |
 |
|
Wernazuma III
|
 |
Decolonize!
Aug 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
I haven't found one, so I bring it up here. Is nobody else outrages?
At first, this son of a bush tells Europeans that by hindering the import of genetic corn they aggravate the malnutrition in Africa, which is utter bullsh*t and that fears about negative effects of genetic food on the human body are irrational (although in this point I actually agree, at least no direct effects). The he tells European at lunch "to enjoy this genetically manipulated meal." For this arrogant remark, I'd have walked over to him and stuffed his foul mouth with his genetic corn!
Of course, Bush's interest is to diminish famine in Africa, introducing genetic corn would not aggravate the dependance of farmers from Monsanto seeds - NO WAY! It is pure coincidence that agriculture minister Ann Veneman is from Calgene/Pharmacia and was a major donatos to Bush's run for presidency, NOOO! It's all about the poor people in Africa who'll have to buy seeds every year from Monsanto, because you can't use the grown corn as seeds anymore. And because the crops are highly vulnerable to certain parasites (as genetically streamlined products always are) they'll have to buy masses of Monsanto pesticides to which the crops are of course resistant.
But instead of laughing and saying "No way!", our dear European leaders obviously found a way to profit from genetic food too and are giving in. Probably it will be soon called "a breakthrough in the fight against hunger in the world".
I start getting really angry, not much and you'll find me at the next G-8 summit. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
He admits America is a country full of arseholes? Fine.
In fact, all of the west + Israel are so, and so will the Chinese be once they're there.
Madonna said it: it's human nature, it's human nature...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
Of course the real issue is that genetically engineered foods are cheaper so they are a threat to those who produce non genetically engineered food. The alarmist and doomsday scenarios bandied about only make them look more ridiculous.
Ever since mankind left behind the hunter-gatherer days, we've been modifying plants and animals to suit our needs. There is no such thing as "natural food."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
are you not happy I'm considering coming to London?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
DaShi is right. The biggest concern in my mind is that a few corporations will control the world's food supply of in a unique way: they will be the only source for seed. The food itself offers much promise: increased drought resistance, higher seed/plant ratios, disease resistance and most importantly, insect resistance. The latter should help reduce pesticide usage and correspondingly the amount of pesticide residue we have on our food today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
We have always been in competition with insects for food and when they get the upper hand the result is famine. We humans don't have the breeding proclivity of insects so we can only counter with the one advantage we do have: brain power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thorgal
|
|
Tarifa, Cádiz.
Jan 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: At first, this son of a bush tells Europeans that by hindering the import of genetic corn they aggravate the malnutrition in Africa |
The son of a bush forgets that evil Europeans provide SEVEN times more aid to Africa and underdeveloped countries than the United States.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wernazuma III
|
 |
Decolonize!
Aug 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
If the poor people in Africa want to use them, let them use them.
Oh, and please step down from your moral Olympus, and allow those poor African farmers you're obviously so worried of, to fairly compete against your own farmers by stopping to subsidize them. |
Lamentably, just when posting the thread I was called off and have little time. So, for now, just a few words:
They have no chance but to use them, because it's what they get in US "aid". Most governments in Africa are not pleased about this (as Simbabwe, who openly rejected the aid IIRC), the average African simply has no idea what that's all about and just sees the corn itself. THEY don't care and weigh the possible future effects.
Point B: Yes, I actually think that our subsidiary system in agriculture stinks up to the heaven. And this is not specifically an anti-america thread. Our Euro arseholes are the same corporate *****es, maybe even more, if that's possible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wernazuma III
Lamentably, just when posting the thread I was called off and have little time. So, for now, just a few words:
They have no chance but to use them, because it's what they get in US "aid". Most governments in Africa are not pleased about this (as Simbabwe, who openly rejected the aid IIRC), the average African simply has no idea what that's all about and just sees the corn itself. THEY don't care and weigh the possible future effects.
|
If Zimbabwe can do this, so can everyone else. As the Russian proverb goes "One should look at the cleanliness of the teath of a horse that is a gift"
quote:
Point B: Yes, I actually think that our subsidiary system in agriculture stinks up to the heaven. And this is not specifically an anti-america thread. Our Euro arseholes are the same corporate *****es, maybe even more, if that's possible. |
So please, cut the "how dare he" ****.
Ecthelion: Actually, there are more of us. There are about 1 billion people that live on the level of the west. There are about 3-3.5 billion that live so so ( very poor in our standards ), and there about 1.5-2 Billion that live DIRT POOR.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
1 billion? must be all them japanese, canadians and crook people elsewhere counted in.
Since our claims towards the US are older, I suggest they sign some climate protection and THEN we can begin to debate whether or not we should open our markets to African agriculture... remember, our peasants (and especialyl the French peasants) will NEVER accept a drawback in living standard. NOONE in the west ever would unless he's a jobless, those have no lobby, unfortunately... or the poorly-jobbed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
some plants produce toxic substances, and are therefore not recommanded to eat. maybe genetically engineered tomatoes can produce similarly toxic substances, too. just maybe, I'm no friggin microbiologist, which you'd have to be. Azazel, you're a chemistry freak, but you know so am I, and we both know our knowledge is not sufficient to tell.
They genetically engineered tomatoes, before. we eat them nowadays. what did they do? they made them mroe stable elst they're mud when we get home. the price we paid? they taste like water now. that's Dutch tomato. if you're rich, you get Italian tomatoes, tastier and only slightly more prone to become mud.
If taste can disappear, new taste can appear, toxic acids can appear, everything can happen. And we just don'T know how well-tested those products are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
thanks
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|