 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Either that or a Freman!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:29
|
|
japanese, chinese, and korean
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
I saw an interesting documentary last night that claimed that over 50% of British citizens has at least one black ancestor from the last 500 or so years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:29
|
|
how did they figure that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:29
|
|
There was a large black population in the UK, when was that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:29
|
|
well you learn something everyday...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adalbertus
|
 |
Cologne, Germany
Feb 2001 time: 06:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Quite much. The Germans had only limited crossbreeding with other populations in history, and it still shows. Until very recently, German citizenship came only from being a 'pure-blooded German' (i.e people from centuries-old German ascent in Russia could pretend to German citizenship, while Turks living in Germany for decades could not). |
Spiffor, I've to back Boshko - but it depends a bit on what you see as "history". For my point of view and this part of the world, I see as basis what we are roughly can grasp, the pre-roman situation, with Celts in France, partially Spain, Britain, southern Germany... Germanic tribes in north Germany and south Scandinavia, Romanic ethicity (if there ever was such thing) in Italy .. maybe better called Italics, and maybe emerging Slavs in today's Ukraine. History had it that by 100 AC Celts were "crushed" except for Britain. (I think they re-entered Brittany later). But of course their ethnicity didn't disappear but in Gaul, and probably north Italy, they mixed with Italics -- Romans did all they could do to bring their blood to the world. (The only good deed of Agrippina, Neros mother, was to make her home town a proper Roman Colony - Cologne.) In southern Germany, Celts mixed with the then dominant Germanic tribes.
Next step was the time after the fall of West Rome, when Germanic tribes flooded all central and western Europe, to different degrees. Most of the impact in formerly Roman territory, of course had the Franks (which are better described as a confederation of several germanic tribes, and as such a political and not an ethnic construction). Their "ethnic" extension (not their empire) spanned todays regions of Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, northern France to the Loire, and in Germany everything west of the Rhine and north of Alsace, around 50 km east of the Rhine, and the Main valley (the latter are the only ones regularly referred to as Franks in Germany ...). Of course, again they mixed with previous populations after killing the upper 10000 (or sometimes it seems that villages have kept their ethnicity quite well, which might be entirely different from the next village).
On the eastern border, Germanic tribes settled to the Visla/Weichsel until around 400, then they left or were expelled by the Slavs (I don't know any historical records). The Slavs advanced to about the border of the former German Democratic Republic by around 800, and then Germanic settlers moved again to this area (There was lot of unused forest in the region at that time, so who was able to make it arable could settle there without killing other people). Anyway, the result was a slow transition from Germanic to Slavic between central Germany and eastern Poland by, say, 1800.
I just want to leave out Magyars who had all possibilities to mix with German ethnicity during long years in the KuK monarchy.
So, that's why I think that Germany is quite a mixture of ethnicities. The thing with "pure blood" is quite new, maybe as an answer to the French "everyone we conquered is French". And in the years after the war, it was a necessity because there were lots of ethnic Germans in the Eastern Block (Hungary, Rumania, Russia) who were treated almost as politely as Hitler treated the Polish (of course, only those whose grandparents did not decide to move to the Ruhr valley ... oh stupid racism).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
quote: Half of England was predominantly Danish/Nordic over the 10th/11th century. The Normans too were far more Viking than Frankish. |
Norsemen came from Sandanavia. 
quote: Scandinavia (ancient Scandia), name applied collectively to three countries of northern Europe—Norway and Sweden (which together form the Scandinavian Peninsula), and Denmark. The three countries are so grouped because of their historical, cultural, and linguistic affinities. The term Scandinavia is sometimes extended to include Iceland, which is linguistically related to the others, and less often to Finland, which is not linguistically related. The term Nordic has been applied to the five countries of northern Europe (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland) that are united by geographical and economic factors.
Microsoft® Encarta® Encyclopedia 2002. © 1993-2001 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. |
therefore, Scanglish!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|