 |
|  |
 |
|
KrazyHorse
|
 |
Macedonia
May 2001 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Only becuase of training. I would bet on a woman with several weeks of self-defense classes over any man without any fomr of training. Plus men have a few weak spots, like the genitals. If a woman gets a good, swift and strong kick there, the man is down, and women know this and aim there, while guys generally do not (we know how painfull it is). |
Not true. Groin kicks are notoriously unreliable. Most miss entirely.
And the strength issue is the most significant part. A punch from a woman will generally not hurt that much unless it is properly placed. A punch from a man can easily break bones in your face.
Another issue is physical toughness of skin and bones. IIRC women's bones are 25% thinner and far more porous than men's. The dermis is also much thinner, which is why women bruise so easily.
Men are built to fight (quite literally, by the way). Women don't have a number of specific adaptations for unarmed combat that men do...
quote: You guys assume a "guys fight" with punching, why not a "kick him in the nuts, bite him hard and draw blood, and then cut him with somehting sharp" kind of fight? |
This is only an issue in certain situations, the most important of which is rape. If a man has an objective other than causing physical injury to the woman then she does have a good chance to bite or scratch her way out. If he's just looking to break her skull then she'll never get close enough to do it. A fist beats nails any day of the week.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Honestly, the average woman taking on the average man is like me walking into a ring with evander hollyfield... |
I am sorry, but I find that silly. As I said, a trained woman can beat an untrained man, th vast majority of the time. I agree that most of the time a man and a woman with no training whatsoever and at the same relative state of health, fitness and stamina, then a mans chances are better. But they are NOT utterly one sided at all.
quote: Most women can't even do a single frigging pushup. I'm not in great shape but I can do 50 any day you ask me to. |
Then you are in very good shape cause most men I know can't do 50 push-ups in a row. And I have seen wone do push-ups, so maybe you just like hanging around weak women.
I am sorry Krazyhorse, but you make all these pronouncements that are based on...? Not common sense, not science, but what?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
blackice
|
 |
Canada where else...
Sep 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
In reality assault is not just the act of hitting...
So while men do more damage it is not the sole meassure of damage.
Violence against men: Is it ever ok? After all more of that occures than the other...
It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman in a wide house.
-- Proverbs 21:9 (KJV)
Last edited by blackice on 01-07-2003 at 12:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
hey, even a weakling like me can do 50 pushups. or close to it. In the navy we weren't required to do that many. I always did the minimum- I was such a slacker. |
I dare you to ask all your male friends and anone who might do it to jst drop and give you 50. If it was so easy to do 50, why don;t you think the NAVY asks for that many to be done?
quote:
The women had trouble doing their minimum- which is like 12 or 13 pushups. The minimum for men I believe was 27 pushups. |
Push-ups basically measure upper body strength, which women certainly have far less than men. If you are going to be giving me a list of types fo excercises that favor men's strenghts, then no kidding men do better. You try to have men match women in flexibility.
quote:
So you could probably say the average man is twice as strong as the average woman- in terms of upper body strength. |
Yes, upper body, but that by itself is not the deciding factor, and anyone can tell you than with some thinking you can beat someone twice as strong, as long as you aim for where they are weak and try to minimize giving their strengths an edge. I very strong hit aimed at the neck, at the larynx, can really bring anyone down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
I dare you to ask all your male friends and anone who might do it to jst drop and give you 50. If it was so easy to do 50, why don;t you think the NAVY asks for that many to be done?
|
actually we did have to do that many in boot camp and if you are under 20 years old. Once you get to the age 21 to 30 age group, you only have to do 27.
In boot camp we had to do 67 pushups. I did that easily. And I am just as strong as I was back then, even stronger maybe (I still work out with dumbells- not strenuously though)
quote: Yes, upper body, but that by itself is not the deciding factor, and anyone can tell you than with some thinking you can beat someone twice as strong, as long as you aim for where they are weak and try to minimize giving their strengths an edge. I very strong hit aimed at the neck, at the larynx, can really bring anyone down.
|
As for this, well it depends on training. The factor here is men are taller and have longer arm and leg length. So often a woman can not even get in close enough to do damage. But if she is a trained fighter, she can evade the man's punches and get in close enough to do damage.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KrazyHorse
|
 |
Macedonia
May 2001 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
I am sorry, but I find that silly. As I said, a trained woman can beat an untrained man, th vast majority of the time. I agree that most of the time a man and a woman with no training whatsoever and at the same relative state of health, fitness and stamina, then a mans chances are better. But they are NOT utterly one sided at all. |
hah. There are some women out there who can beat some men, but this isn't a technical sport; it's a matter of who can hurt the other person most. And if you want a weak spot, punch a girl in the chest...
For god's sake, look at a woman's hands the next time you get a chance. They don't have knuckles to speak of and the fist probably only weighs half as much as yours does. In a number of areas human beings are a sexually dimorphic species. There is a very significant size difference, as well as structural accomodations to childbirth and rearing on the one hand, and physical combat on the other. There's a reason men have an adam's apple and vastly superior upper body strength...
quote: Then you are in very good shape cause most men I know can't do 50 push-ups in a row. And I have seen wone do push-ups, so maybe you just like hanging around weak women.
I am sorry Krazyhorse, but you make all these pronouncements that are based on...? Not common sense, not science, but what? |
Jesus, GePap. You don't fight welterweights against heavyweights. Especially not when the welterweight's average muscle mass as a proportion is significantly lower than the heavyweight's.
No, most men can't do 50 pushups. But they're a lot closer to it than most women are to even doing 5. And they're lifting 30% more weight each pushup.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
actually we did have to do that many in boot camp and if you are under 20 years old. Once you get to the age 21 to 30 age group, you only have to do 27.
In boot camp we had to do 67 pushups. I did that easily. And I am just as strong as I was back then, even stronger maybe (I still work out with dumbells) |
Wow, so a bunch of men in their late teens,who are generally fit, can do a lot more push-up than women.. and f course these guys are a model for all the beer-swilling gut empowered men out there....
If you aks me: a guy decides to pick a fight and hurt someone by talking a swing and then going on to beat them, then certainly a woman will be an "easy target" becuase they are weaker in general. The thing is, I would not think doing so against men is any better, and would hope anyone who did this got a hefty time in jail. The question is, if and wehn violence might be acceptable, does the gender of the other person make a difference? For me, in those rare times that violence is in any ways justified, then no, gender makes no difference. People wo go out to pick fights should be in prison for assault and disorderly conduct.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KrazyHorse
|
 |
Macedonia
May 2001 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Wow, so a bunch of men in their late teens,who are generally fit, can do a lot more push-up than women.. and f course these guys are a model for all the beer-swilling gut empowered men out there....
If you aks me: a guy decides to pick a fight and hurt someone by talking a swing and then going on to beat them, then certainly a woman will be an "easy target" becuase they are weaker in general. The thing is, I would not think doing so against men is any better, and would hope anyone who did this got a hefty time in jail. The question is, if and wehn violence might be acceptable, does the gender of the other person make a difference? For me, in those rare times that violence is in any ways justified, then no, gender makes no difference. People wo go out to pick fights should be in prison for assault and disorderly conduct. |
The women in the navy were almost certainly in better physical shape relative to the average woman than the men were to the average man. Unless the recruitment numbers have changed drastically...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|