 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:29
|
|
Inspired by Vesayen's graduation thread (again, congrats!) I'd like to know your studying methods. Most of you are studying in colleges and unis, so let's hear them!
Also please tell what you are studying, so we can see if there are any differencies between subjects and strategies.
I'm starting studies at comp sci and software engineering and mathematics.
My style of studying is (in terms of working through course) to first read the first page of the book and see what the book is really about, if the book is essential in the course. Naturally won't work in programming the best way though... 
I check out the subject of the day, and a day or two before that I quickly go through the text in the book, and maybe check out the subject from the internet too. I won't try to memorize it all, just read it quickly and try to understand what it is about, and then figure out what is important and essential, and what is not so important. I try to see the big picture.
Now I can effectively follow the class and be pleased to my efforts and I don't have to work so hard to keep up with the important things. Now is my time to ask, if there were any questions that I had the day before and still wasn't cleared out. I have maybe even wrote up few questions I need to get clarified. Naturally I make notes if the teacher or professor had some useful stuff.
If not before, now I should be able to see the bigger picture.
Then I get back from the class, and start underlining the most important things if I hadn't done it already. I might even skip the underlining part. Now I go through quickly the stuff that was in the class relaxed and I don't have to stress out too much. Assuming I understood it.
If the subject is hard for me, I like to write things down that I think is important. It takes time and effort, but then I can utilize both writing, reading and seeing methods. After this I only go through the papers I just wrote, and not the book. If the subject is not that tough, I won't go through this, but hit the internet and check out some more info. And that's about it.
Then when the exams are close, I don't need to make such a big effort anymore, and can effectively start thinking about the next course about the same subject.
Well what the heck, they're all about programming .
What's your style?
Also I find it good not to force it. If it doesn't fit my head, I just go outside and do something, or see some buddies. I don't have rigorous program that I follow too closely.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:29
|
|
Usually I don't bother with the details. I just want to get the big picture right and how stuff works. To me, everything else is secondary.. Sometimes it backfires a little, but I don't blame myself. But at least I know how things work and what the big picture is.
Sometimes, especially in programming, I just try to draw things if I don't get them.. I just draw objects, lay them in front of me and it helps most of the times.
Also when I study new things, I try to think how they fit into the even bigger picture with the stuff I already know. Does it change something I have learned before? How they effect each other? I find this method very helpful and this way I remember lots of things easier.
Before bigger exam I usually just write down few words to paper that I find essential, and then try to think everything that the word is about and what it really means. If I don't handle some of those words well, I just go back to my writings and check it out and try again. Again and again. It doesn't take too much time IF I have followed the earlier methods. And this is where I know how I'm going to do, I know if I have mastered it, or if I need more work. The most important thing is, that I can now know how much I really know, and how much I still need to read and study, and hopefully after few times I know I have mastered it.
Last edited by Pekka on 01-07-2003 at 10:53
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
As has been suggested, go over any sample tests or old exams. If the professor gave you a study guide, review that. Then, go over your lecture notes. If available, go over the chapter summaries at the end of the chapters in your book.
By this point, you should have a good idea which concepts you are clear on and which concepts you are not. Read over the parts in the book for concepts you are unclear on. If you still fail to grasp the concept, see a fellow TA or prof for help(VERY important, don't neglect. Perhaps the best way to ensure a good grade)
Finally, if you believe it to be relevant to the test, skim thourgh your book and look up key vocabulary words. You can often infer the right answer to question by knowing what a key word means.
Of course, studying is only as important as being a good test taker, but that is another matter entirely..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
studying is for pussies. I got my 94% graduation without ever studying. there's a man.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
Well let me see:
In Biology I relied heavily onto the questions of old exams, just as Shi meontions. They are especially helpful at the Exam at the end of the first half of the study (so called Basic Study), where you have to write tests in Physics, Chemistry and of course Biology (where it isn´t uncommon that 50-70% of those who take part fail the tests).
But my strategy was different for the verbal Diploma examinations. There you are have to choose a main subject, a special subject and a minor subject out of different fields in Biology and another minor subject from outside the biology (so it´s 4 Examinations; you are free to choose the Dates for them, but all examinations have to be completed within one month after the Date for the first Examination).
Afterwards you´ve got to speak with the Profs where you want to make those examinations, to further clarify on which Subjects out of the fields you chose the Examination should concentrate. Many Profs just let you choose several Chapters out of biological Textbooks (as for example for my Examination in Animal Physiology [main subject], where I chose the Chapters "Heart and Blood Circulation" and "Gas Exchange and Acid-Base Balance" from Eckert: Animal Physiology (so I had 210 pages to learn))
other Profs just make a general outline of the subjects to be tested (as for my Examination in Microbiology [minopr subject / Biology] where the Prof just said "O.K., so we make a little bit of the basic principles of Molecular Genetics and also the lac-Operon and trp-Operon, this should cover the 30 minutes, the examination takes".).
Of course you shouldn´t be too confident that only those subjects, you spoke of, are tested within the Examination, the Profs are free to ask other things out of the field of study as well 
I chose the Date of my Examinations so that I had 2 Month to learn.
For those Examinations I made a lot of handwritigns. For example for Animal Physiology I just tried to compress those Chapters, and tried to express all things mentioned with much fewer words (and also I drew those Illustrations in the Book [for example of
the various types of hearts and Circulatory Systems] for myself).
I spend maybe 8-12 hours a day with learning for the subjects and maybe 1 month before the first Examination I stopped going out with friends on weekends.
Maybe 1-2 weeks before the Examination I started making Cards with Questions about the Subject on the one Side and the Answers on the other side (Animal Physiology was the first one with my Special Subject (Neurobiology) being examined at the same day (Main Subject and Special Subject are always tested the same day and your Special Subject has to be connected to the Main Subject and has to be examined by the same Prof).
After all, my learning proved to be successful 
As for my study in Computer Science,
I learn a lot at home and rarely attend to Lectures. In those subjects tested we get several problems we should solve at home and the answers are discussed once a week. Solving those problems helps me more in learning the subject at hand, than attending to the lectures.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
not that far.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:29
|
|
I wish I could be, too.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|