 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sandman
|
 |
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001 time: 05:29
|
|
I'm rather fond of wind-power, myself. No fiddly yet to be developed technology, reasonably constant, ecologically benign and it uses windswept areas which have little other economic use.
On fusion, I'm both sceptical and nervous. Firstly, fusion has been on the drawingboard for fifty years and nothing hs come of it. Secondly, we'd still be using the heat generated to heat water and spin turbines, just like two hundred years ago. This is not especially efficient. Thirdly, with unlimited energy, we'd have no incentive to conserve energy, and large-scale fusion would create risks of global warming, simply by heating the planet up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:29
|
|
Oh wow, Sava called me a troll. I should run away and hide because he hurt his feelings.
The fact that I have not once insulted you in this thread makes me wonder why you said I should stop insulting and trolling, but who cares about that. . .
Or, I could ignore the fact that he knows nothing but clichés and continue pissing him off.
I read the first paragraph, and you're right, it is about gasoline and natural gas. So one point for you. Natural gas prices still are affected more by increasing environmental regulation than anything else so I stand by that statement.
quote:
the Bush admin gives tax CREDITS for SUV's.
|
The SUVs have to be a legitimate business expense to earn the tax credit. In other words, they have to be used as light trucks, not as cars. Of course people with good lawyers will get around that, but you can't blame the administration or lawmakers for the ways that underhanded people will manipulate laws. And you should be more complete and honest with your information in any event.
quote:
the industry isn't giving consumers the choice between huge gas guzzlers and efficient vehicles. The industry average in fuel consumption has gone down since 1987.
|
You're misrepresenting statistics and drawing an invalid conclusion. The average fuel consumption has declined because of the increased market share of SUVs, which are considered light trucks for CAFE purposes. Fuel efficient vehicles are available, and are more efficient than ever. They just aren't popular.
quote:
we can't make a gas-powered sedan that can do better than 30 mpg...
|
The problem is not Big Oil. The problem is that in order to meet CAFE standards, automakers reduce the weight of vehicles, and make them less crashworthy as a result. If you were going to get in a crash in a Geo Metro or in a Toyota Camry, which would you prefer?
And after that you pretty much threadjacked your own thread.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|