 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
i heard it's real expensive... is it really necessary? i'm a healthy young male and i'm not going to get cancer or anything any time soon so what do you think? and at what age should i start getting some? how many people here got medical insurance?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
it's so expensive though and chances are i won't have nothing happen to me...
i mean doctors will help me in an emergency whether i got insurance or not and thats ultimately what matters... i'm sure i could somehow rummage up enough money for the bill...? or is an uninsured patient's bill that much higher or in other words, what percentage of the bill does the insurance company pay?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
slowwwhand:
car insurance is mandatory? ****... i doubt even half of the people in philly got car insurance... no lie
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
actually you know what... it is mandatory in pennsylvania cause i saw commercials warning about how your car would get taken if you dont got insurance... and now there's all these "minimum coverage" car insurance companies that say "we keep you legal for less"
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
connorkimbro
|
 |
Seoul Korea
Jan 1970 time: 23:29
|
|
i was thinking about this earlier today actually. it would seem (maybe i'm wrong) that as the severity of a thing happening goes up, the chance of it happening goes down. also, the severity of a thing goes up, and cost goes up.
so that means that as the cost of a thing goes up, the chance of it happening goes down.
as the chance of it happening goes down, the frequency of it happening also goes down.
so, if you add up regular insurance payments for a set period of time, and then add up what is likely to happen that will require payment within that same time period, which would cost more? . . . .
insurance companies make money somehow, and it isn't from the doctors. and ESPECIALLY if doctors/hospitals cut bills if you pay in cash. . . me thinks i'll be skipping out on health insurance and saving the money in a bank or something, then IF something happens, i'll pay for it in cash.
i think, in the long run, this would save money, under all but the most extreme of circumstances.
is my logic flawed here?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
connorkimbro
|
 |
Seoul Korea
Jan 1970 time: 23:29
|
|
i'm from the US too, did you forget? 
Anyway, i have health and dental and all that now, the army gives it to me. not that military medical care is terrific, but i don't pay anything for it either. i was just thinking about after i get out.
tell me, why do hospitals prefer you to have health insurance, than you paying in cash?
I can see that they want to you have health insurance, because NORMALLY, if you don't, you wouldn't be able to pay in cash either. they don't want to be doing their work for free.
But if you can and do pay in cash, why would they not want that? They get their money easier, faster, with less hassle, and no middle man to skim off the top.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
well, you got the harpoon out of your chest... does that mean you got to rush to the ATM machine to withdraw your account?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|