 |
|
Kaak
|
|
wow...No comparison, LotR!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
HP books, edging LotR movies. Subject to change if extended edition of TTT is as big an improvement as it was for Fellowship, though I don't know how it could be... TTT was damned near perfect.
I'll take Jason Kidd. He's tougher than Kobe. It's a close decision, though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
i'm unfamiliar with Kidd's ppg though... isnt it around 17 or so though? just over half of Bryant's... not really that great... though i do understand that the guard's main job isnt to rack up points but to move the ball but Bryant clearly does that as well and still manages such a high ppg... i do kind of question how good he would be alone on another team but i still think he gets this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:29
|
|
Vince Carter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
cinch:
carter just barely made my poll... there's countless other guards who were more than worthy of this limited, four slot poll but i was in some kind of odd mood and threw him in... damn maybe Stockton would've been a better choice especially since he's old school...
anyway just because carter dunks people think he's so great... :rollseyes:
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Lord of the Rings. Harry Potter is enjoyable, but it just can't compete with Tolkien's work. |
Ive been into LOTR for 30 years, Ive read the Silmarillion, and i must beg to disagree.
Tolkiens world is fascinating. His mass of details, history, mythology, languages etc. But his charecterizations are weak and his dialogue uneven. In LOTR only the hobbits and Gandalf come off as real characters, not cartoons. And of those, only Frodo and Sam come off as characters with any depth, who really grow through the novels and hold your interest as characters. Whereas Harry Potter is filled with interesting, beleivable characters, who really develop, and whose dilemnas illustrate real human problems.
I guess another way of saying it is that LOTR succeeds as a genre novel - perhaps the greatest genre novel of all time - while Harry Potter succeeds as general literature - though there it must compete with so many great works, that Harry Potter may end up not being thought a classic as much as LOTR.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|