 |
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
Dunno, Smiley.
After all you would have more Pictures of burned, suffering People and Pictures of a City, destroyed by a Nuclear Bomb.
And this time it would not be just a bunch of strange small yellow coloured people with slitted eyes, but people who look much like the ordinary american and which many americans problably could have familial ties to one of those victims.
So I´d think Public Opinion would also in America shift against the use of Nuclear Weapons. And I think Public Opinion doesn seem to play a certain role in warfare (thinking of Vietnam, where AFAIK Public Opinion seemed to be involved in the US Troops retreating from Vietnam).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
A few comments first.
Some of the uranium oxide reprocessed for the US A-bombs came from a surrendered U-boat that was on its way to Japan. Without that, there would have been a delay of several months in producing a second, let alone a third, operational bomb.
The A-bombs were not needed to militarily defeat Germany or Japan. They were used against Japan partly to avoid the casualties of an invasion and partly to send a message to the Soviets about who was going to run the world after the end of WWII.
The division of Germany was agreed at the Yalta conference. US and British troops could have crossed the Elbe and possibly even beaten the Soviets to Berlin but the political decision not to was already taken. It probably wasn't in US/UK interests to make it easier for the Soviets to finish off German resistance.
As for the actual question, the likely answer IMO is that europeans are a stubborn and awkward bunch and, once the USSR also had the bomb and MAD was born, limiting further use, resentment against US use of such a weapon in Europe would have significantly strengthened communist sympathies in several european countries and could possibly have led to communist led governments in Italy and France.
Forward basing of US nuclear weapons in Europe, an essential part of the US cold war strategy would also have been even more politically contentious in Europe than it has been. It could have led to the fall of several governments in Germany and the UK that supported US basing of conventional and nuclear forces.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Yeah, but Japan is different . I could imagine that the Green movement, that is already big in Europe, could be much, much bigger. They've already taken out nuclear power in Germany. |
hi ,
and in the next elections they shall reuse them , ....
there is huge browncoal plant ( the biggest in w europe ) on the road from liege to cologne , .... man , you should see that pollution , .....
park your car 5 miles away and you can write your name in the dust after 10 minutes , ..... *cough*
*cough*
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|