 |
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
February 12th, 1945: General Dwight Eisenhower hurredly sends the following communication to the Head of the RAF, Arthur Harris:
"I have been ordered by President Roosevelt to fully delay, for an indefinite period, tomorrow's planned bombing of Dresden. Have your men stand down and await further instructions."
Air Marshall Harris was furious, but was partially mollified when, reassured that this decision was due to no bad reflection on his work, he was informed that there were other plans for the city of Dresden "if this war drags on too long."
March 1st, 1945: The world is stunned to learn of the accidental death of the USSR's Marshall Zhukov early last week, due, not to the dangers of war, but to a simple accident of falling down the stairs in the town of ... Taking advantage of the Soviets confusion, Germany began a ferocious counterattack, though nobody truly expected it to do more than delay the inevitable for a few months - if at that. Unfortunately for the city of Dresden, Germany got their delay.
September 2nd, 1945: The third atomic warhead used in WW2 went off today in Dresden Germany, causing the swift end of German resistance. The Americans announcement that such a disaster was coming "saved" over 500,000 lives so that the loss was "only" 75,000. The remnants of the German government officially surrendered on September 3rd, just hours after they murdered Hitler.
Assume that the cold war conditions remained the same (i.e., Berlin was still divided as was Germany (but do you think that Dresden would now be a W. Germany city?))
What would be the short and long-term effects of such an action?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:29
|
|
Dino :
The Dresden bomb was the third, after the Japanese bombings. "September 2nd, 1945: The third atomic warhead used in WW2 went off today in Dresden Germany". Though IIRC the US had only 3 bombs at that time, one blew up during the Trinity test and 2 others in Japan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
The firebombings were indeed a horrific atrocity seen as efficiently essential to German collapse, yet an A-bomb attack was quite out of range on European culture unless desperately needed. I am of the educated opinion that both could have been avoided and Soviet expansion in Eastern Europe stemmed if only a bargain surrender involving German collapse of Nazi governement and acceptance of the usual interm Allied control - with Germany remaining in control of Northern France, to be assimilated by language and loose culture before German self sovereignty was re-estabslished.
Leaving Southern France as the new nation would have been a much better scenario, as the people there are generally of more acceptable attitude, and would have a comparitively thriving economy unburdened by the ignorance of the north half. With the north majorly assimilated into German culture within 20 years, any re-unification sentiment would be near non-existent. Furthermore, future German aggression could just as easily have been stemmed with the inevitable diversion of fear towards the Soviet threat - which could not be contained out of Europe to full measures in any scenario.
Even still, an A-bombing of a smaller German town might have been necessary to instill a fear in them not unlike the post WW2 Japanese... and at about the same general population as Japan in my propsal - Germany would have provided a third major capitalist economic power to compete considerably with the US and Asian Isle, raising the speed and stakes for the cold war reds - and collapsing their efforts of evil much sooner.
War is a terrible thing, and no matter what - healing becomes the end result. That is where I try to come in.
-Doc
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|