 |
| |
|
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:29
|
|
First the Bad News.
My contract will soon be over, and after next week, it's back to unemployment line for me . . . maybe. Because of how my contract fell across quarters, I may not be eligible until October.  We have enough money to pay August and September's rent, but October will be stretching our resources greatly. And, since our fair state, like most of the rest of the union, is in a severe budget shortfall, they could well be looking for any excuse to deny eligibility. It's really too bad, cuz they want to keep me and I want to stay, but there's no more money in the budget for me. They have said when they have another opportunity, they will contact me.
Good news is that my DSL provider now provides static IPs for only $15 extra a month, which means I can now my own websites and save a bundle. Even better, I can start charging others to host their websites. 
Now for the Really Good news
==================
GOP frets about Bush re-election chances
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Ron Fournier - AP Wire
July 23, 2003 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- For the first time since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, rank-and-file Republicans say they are worried about President Bush's re-election chances based on the feeble economy, the rising death toll in Iraq and questions about his credibility.
"Of course it alarms me to see his poll figures below the safe margins," said Ruth Griffin, co-chair of Bush's 2000 campaign steering committee in New Hampshire. "If he isn't concerned, and we strong believers in the Bush administration aren't concerned, we must have blinders on."
The worries emerged as Griffin and nearly two dozen other GOP stalwarts were interviewed by The Associated Press in advance of the Republican National Committee's meeting this week in New York, site of the 2004 GOP presidential convention and the starting point of Bush's wartime surge in popularity.
Bush's poll ratings skyrocketed after the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center as he led the nation in mourning and then to war with blunt talk and a confidence that soothed an anxious nation. Polls show that about six of every 10 Americans still approve of the way he's doing his job, a solid rating that buoys Republican hopes that Bush will overcome his current problems and breeze to re-election.
But the president has seen a drop in other early warning indicators, including the number of people expressing confidence in his credibility and leadership along with his handling of the economy and postwar Iraq.
"We've got nine Democrats out there beating up on him. That's the problem," said Joyce Terhes of Maryland, a member of the 165-person RNC.
"The economy is touch and go," said **** Taylor, another RNC member from Maryland. "I've got to believe it recovers really fast. If not, obviously we'll be in some trouble."
Republicans said there will be trouble for Bush if postwar Iraq continues to claim the lives of American troops. Another U.S. solider was killed Tuesday, bringing the total killed in action to 153 -- six more than during the 1991 Gulf War.
"This guerrilla warfare is disturbing," said former Rep. John Paul Hammerschmidt, an RNC member from Arkansas.
A recent CNN-Time poll found that 47 percent view Bush as a leader they can trust, down from 56 percent in March. A thin majority of voters said they harbor doubts about his leadership.
Some Republicans say they fear the drop is the result of Democrats harping on 16 words in Bush's Jan. 28 State of the Union address in which he cited a British report suggesting that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa for a nuclear weapons program.
The claim has been challenged by U.S. intelligence officials. Top-level White House aides have said the words should not have been in the speech; Bush said the phrase had been cleared by CIA director George Tenet.
Several GOP backers said they were surprised that Bush didn't shoulder any blame himself, appealing to voters who consider him a straight-shooting leader and tend to support him even when they disagree with his policies.
"For the first time he's waffled a little bit on the Niger-uranium story," Hammerschmidt said. "They didn't confront that totally. They let Tenet take the bullet."
"I'm not sure they've totally gotten their act together," said the Arkansan.
Other Republicans said the polls reflected voter concerns with Bush's staff, not the president himself.
"I really think it's a concern about the people he has around him, and not really about him and his character," said Christine Olson, an oil and gas drilling contractor and RNC member from Pennsylvania.
There was unanimity among the Republicans that Bush's word is still golden, and they dutifully predicted he will overcome challenges on the economy, postwar Iraq and his handling of intelligence.
"The Democrats have hung their hopes on one sentence," said former Connecticut GOP chair Chris DePino. "The nation would be better off hanging its hopes on George Bush."
Bush campaign manager Ken Mehlman said, "It's also important to point out that many of today's loudest critics agreed that Saddam Hussein threatened our national security just a few months ago. A lot of what we hear today is Democrat primary politics."
Bush's main justification for war was the assertion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but none has been found.
The administration also has not located terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden nor Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, though a U.S. raid Tuesday killed Saddam's sons.
Hammerschmidt, the former Arkansas congressman, said that if given a chance he would tell Bush there's a simple way to regain ground lost in polls.
"Talk very frankly and candidly to the American people," he said. "That has been your strength."
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
chegitz guevara
|
|
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:29
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
If you filled for unemployment less then a year ago then you already have an open claim and you cannot be denied unemployment as long as you haven't exhoasted your total entitlement yet. Just call EDD and they will reactivate your existing claim. |
It's just over a year and I hadn't exhausted my previous claim.
File Claim 7/1/2002. With my extention, I had enough money to go to about 4/15/2003.
I started working 3/7/2003.
If I file 8/1/2003, then only the 1st quarter of 2003 (plus the last 3 quarters of 2002) will be considered. I got a month's pay in April 2002 and there weeks pay in March 2003, so actually, I'll be eligible for a small amount.
If I wait 'till October, I'll be ablt to include the 2nd Quarter 2003, but not 2nd quarter 2002. This would mean a lot more money would be available, but they have this rule about the quarter with the highest earning being twice what you've earned in all the other quarters, which it would be (unless, for some reason, unemployment counts against itself). Which means I'd likely be ineligable.
If I wait 'till December, I'd be getting the greatest amount of money, but would probably be homeless. 
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000
time: 07:29
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sava
Yeah Che... if you are unemployed, it means you are lazy! 
[/conservative sava] |
actually, yes.  I am jobless, because I am lazy. I fully admit it. I don't recieve any benefits from the state for being jobless, though.
I think that people that are young and able, and don't have a job, don't want the job hard enough. Sure, some of them are shitty, but you're just as good as the next guy, and this job has to be done by someone. Why do you think you're better than other people?
I am about to get a job sometime soon, though. All it has to do is coinside with my University classes.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29.
Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
24-07-2003 21:52
|
|