 |
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
quote:
We are certainly interested in future/ongoing joint research efforts.
I must admit that we have not yet determined where we want to go next with research. Our early discussion on the subject got no further than beelining to IA.
Going from memory - we will have the prerequisites (if any are needed) for:
Progenitor Psych
Doc: Mobility
Social Psych
Biogenetics
High Energy Chemistry
Non-linear Mathematics
Polymorphic Software
Many, if not all of these technologies are valuable, either inherently or as stepping stones to other techs...
A level three armor is very nice to have! (Both for its defensive ability and for the added level it pemits to upgraded crawlers)
A4 weapon...though a virtual dead end in regard to research, if one of us were to get rover rushed, having impact counterattack capability could prove vital.
Social Psych is the first step toward mineral and energy restriction lifiting. (and Ethics, which we will need to boom)
Biogenetics is very important for its recycling tanks...particularly for Hive, I should imagine.
Is flex the most important application we have to pursue? Why?
Is the most efficient way to pursue our chosen applicaton(s) by joint leapfrogging or by seperate paths and exchanging at a later point in time?
At any event, we Drones must decide where we want to go next.
Repeating - It is certainly our desire to research cooperatively with the Hive and to share all the benefits of that cooperative research. The 'If' qusestion is answered with an unqualified yes. The 'where' and 'how' questions must be soon resolved.
- Mongoose
|
The hive needs to brainstorm on which techs we want and why.
Think of all useful techs that we want to get, no further than "Air Power".
Then state reasons why we would want to get them. Then give each a rating out of 10 for how important that tech is.
Give all your ideas. Not just the tech you think is the most important.
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
The problem with your proposed route, Jamski, is that it creates a large imbalance. I recongize the requirement to concentrate on a strong base right now, but that DOES NOT mean ignoring our defensive needs. We can, of course, lean in a certain direction, but we do need to address all aspect of our society. For the immediate future, if we were to research Impact ASAP, and then in the nfuture synthmetal, it would keep us safe for a while and would sucessfully balance out the scale (from my knowledge we are getting synth anywho sometime down the line, when we feel we want it from the drones, so all we'd need to do is stick Impact in 1-2 techs from now). Also, the The rest of the time can indeed be spend pursuing ecological engineering.
Re: the pirates. Depending on a faction we haven't even met yet for vital military research isn't exactly very sound. latest intel says they have met both cycon and the uni, so even if they WOULD give us those two for something, it is very unlikely we would have anything to give back. Mobility and flexbility are not priorities right now, but we will want them within 20 turns or we will be hooped as far as defense goes.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
I'm actually rather open on the tech path thing at the moment.
I'm trying to gather information to form an opinion on what should be done. The person who has the most convicing tech strategy gets my vote.
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
I would build social pysch right now so we have Rec Commons available. We WILL need these to counter drones (ours, not the faction) in the near future. After that, it would be good to have particle impactors available to us. We don't necessarily need to build any, just have them around "in case". With our defensive needs out of the way, it would then be wise to go for Biogenetics so that we can pursue Ecological Engineering as Jamski suggested.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jamski
|
 |
lol ED&D is officially full PvP LOL
May 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
Pah! We can't feed our people or build our boreholes with particle impactors. We are IN NO DANGER of an invasion at the current moment, either from the Drones, or from another faction. This game will be a slow cooker, noone will WANT to risk an early war, and if they do, then our free defences make us NOT the number one target for anyone. Sure defence is fine, but right now, its wasted research. We have no enemies, but we do want to get some good bases up and some nice terraforming. This will let us build a superior army in the longer term. We already have 2-armour don't we? (Thanks Drones) so we can put that behind a perimiter defence and we get something that will stop everything up to missilelauncherweapons. No worries there. We'd be stupid to start grabbing millitary techs now. We should get SOMETHING we can offer the Pirates for the "doctrine Techs", as we WILL meet them sooner rather than later. And even then they pose no danger yet. If people ARE worried about defence, then we should build some probe teams. Its more likely we get probed than attacked at this stage of the game.
-Jam
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
I'd tend to agree, with Jamski. However, I don't think the pirates will be so quick to trade flexibility.
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
Bah. Jamski, I was NEVER proposing to go ape **** wild with the military. All I was proposing is covering our asses for the time being. Researching Impact weapons would NOT affect our faction in the long run other than we wouldn't risk getting our asses handed to us on a nice Uni/Cycon/Pirate/Data Angel/Believer platter (notice the list there, it is impossible to predict exactly what they are thinking, remember that.) I am not even saying we should BUILD impact weapons in the near future, just that we have them so we are not waiting 8-9 turns to research them when the **** hits the fan. I agree that mobility and flexibility can wait, but ignoring impact weapons would be shear stupidity. In my proposed research plan I have made sure to get what we need for our hive first, that being rec commons, THEN we can go for impact, and after that,we wouldn't need flexibility or mobility for 30-40 turns.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
Re: Synthmetal. Getting IB would mean longer to research all of our other techs. It is better to wait getting that until later so we can research quicker right now. I DO agree that what we need is synthmetal garrisons in our cities. Coupled with our rovers, that would indeed provide adequate defenses for now. However, as I have said before, it would be VERY prudent to have the option of building impact units IF something were to happen.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
Why rec commons, can't we just build more police?
So people think we should skip flexibility?
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
Perhaps someone else can do that.....
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
As kody pointed out, we already have lasers. Impact is just one quick tech away. And yes, I agree, we shouldn't invest in building impact infantry right now, just have it there in case we need it. At present, yes, synthmetal garissions is what we need to actually produce and use.
Re: Police. In my experience depending on more than 1 unit a base for police is.... dangerous. If you need to quickly rush defences to another city, you end up having to severly scale back production in the other cities where you are taking your defenders from. Also, in terms of an offensive conflict, you either encur larger support costs or put up with a smaller offensive contingent because your entire army is tied down as police, rather than being free to move. In terms of regular life, having rec commons is always good. Even if we do max out police, having a rec common would allow us to maximize our production, or have doctors or whatever our fetish is at the time. Also, from the attitude on this forum, we don't seem so keen on building military units, so we'd just end up with a bunch of drone ridden cities. Definately not good.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
I apologize for the lack of facts and studies. lol, I am just going from my in-game experience.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:29
|
|
Well I figured we could build police, and upgrade them to non-lethal methods. I don't think military is a high priority this game. The drones are further behind than us on military units guarding their cities.
I figured we go for biogenetics. Let the drones do their proposed social pysch and ethical calculus. Then go for lifting all the restrictions.
I'm hoping to nab one of the anti-drone SP after doing the WP. If not we can ask the drones to give us social psych when we need. I'll look at organising the tech sharing.
Kody
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
quote: Well I figured we could build police, and upgrade them to non-lethal methods |
That is what I usually do, but once again i try to keep my dependance on police down to one unit for the reasons I stated above.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snowflake
|
 |
falling, once again
Apr 2003 time: 23:29
|
|
Here's my 2 cents (1 cent less than dear deputy of course). We'll need rec commons eventually, but not now. We have other things in the building list that is of a higher priority. We should do the doctor in the very near term, then build a police where is needed when the base finished its crawlers. We'll be ok for a while if we could get VW or HGP after WP. At that time we probably could have got impact, and can upgrade the scouts so that we will have a offensive force already formed if needed. After the restrictions lifting, we'll probably be pop booming, this is the time we would need the rec commons (or holo theater if we have VW).
Last edited by Snowflake on 31-07-2003 at 19:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rokossovky
|
|
Marshal of the Revolutionary Army of the Socialist People of the Human Hive
May 2003 time: 22:29
|
|
Um, yea, that makes sense HongHu. I guess I really shouldn't be complaining if you guys actually want to build more units... . However, I do follow a different path, and I have found it fairly safe and rewarding at the same time. Whenever I play my bases always follow a definate pattern (other than an SP base and a unit production base, usually first and second built cities) which goes defensive unit, former, 2 colony pods, then rec commons, network node, children's creche, and finally hologram theater. In my experience that has served me well and kept drones in check until pop 7, in which case I build a second defender (by this time it is usually needed militarily as well...) and a hab complex.
- Rokossovky
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|