 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
Did that intellectual come from SouthWestern France? I bet he didn't come from Marseille or Lens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
Yachvili is not the first scum half. This is Galthie.
Actually, I believe that, right now, our best choice of scrum half are, in this order and considering only the players selected for the RWC:
Galthie, Michalak, Merceron, Dominici, 25 others, Yachvili.
But then, noone ever listens to me as to who should play scrum half anyway. Maybe Yachvili would make a good hooker?
quote: I'm also wondering why they opted to kick for goal when down 3-38, followed by a drop goal? |
The penalty kick was weird. Geting a lineout at 5 meters would have been much better in my opinion. I believe in almost everyone's opinion. Maybe Merceron wanted to show he could score points in-match?
The drop goal, on the other side, was not so bad, since it was unclear the French could attack from that ball and that position. They would have needed to regroup, create a new ruck or maul, and then redeploy the backs. Getting those points was not that bad an idea. And I like drop goals, too. They force the defense to consider an additional option.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by LDiCesare
25 others, Yachvili. |

quote: The penalty kick was weird. Geting a lineout at 5 meters would have been much better in my opinion. I believe in almost everyone's opinion. Maybe Merceron wanted to show he could score points in-match?
The drop goal, on the other side, was not so bad, since it was unclear the French could attack from that ball and that position. They would have needed to regroup, create a new ruck or maul, and then redeploy the backs. Getting those points was not that bad an idea. And I like drop goals, too. They force the defense to consider an additional option. |
In the context of the game - 30+ points behind - I thought the drop goal option was just as pointless as the penalty kick. England were obviously determined to keep them try-less. Why not go for the try regardless of how much more work it took? They had absolutely nothing to lose and tries would have been very important psychologically. I agree that drop goals can be useful in that they can force a defence to consider additional options, but it has less meaning when the defence is sitting on a 30+ lead. I suspect, unfortunately, that the England defence would consider both the penalty kick and drop goal victories for them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
You could have two referees in a rugby game, one on the field and one off. The one off the field could have control of numerous cameras and could be in constant contact with the referee on the field. This way the referee with the cameras could watch the areas that the referee on the field is unable to. I think it could work if properly planned.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
It would require a lot of cooperation between the two refs...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andydog
If refs work to IRB directives then why would there be one set of directives for the SH and another for the NH refs? |
The problem is that the NH referees are currently changing their way to police a game according to the IRB's directives based on Murdoch's... euh, no, sorry... on the Rugby played in the SH. But the games they are policing in the NH are different as they are still closer to the spirit of the original Rugby game (you know, scrums, mauls... etc). The SH referees are used to rule games like this when the NH referees must learn a different way of policing a game. 
quote: You make an interesting point about the speed of the modern game making it more difficult to police. Perhaps make more use of touch judges? |
The two we know today are already useless as it is well known they are blind. Adding more of them won't be very useful if they share the same flaws.
quote: For example, give the touch judges the priority call on, say, forward passes. Perhaps there is a way to make more use of TV refs. |
This is a possibility, we could also imagine two referees on the field, each in charge of a different aspect of the game. Imagine a scrum (it should not be too difficult they have not yet disappeared in the SH), the behavior of the forwards could be very different with a referee looking for a foul under the scrum while the backs would think twice before putting themselves off-side with the other referee watching for them.
This was tested a few years ago during a Junior RWC in France and the results were great: game time doubled and number of fouls halved.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andydog
If refs work to IRB directives then why would there be one set of directives for the SH and another for the NH refs? |
The differences are disappearing. As Tamerlin observes in his typically unbiased, objective way.
quote: You make an interesting point about the speed of the modern game making it more difficult to police. Perhaps make more use of touch judges? For example, give the touch judges the priority call on, say, forward passes. Perhaps there is a way to make more use of TV refs. |
But it's already the touchies' job to watch for things like forward passes. I think the touchies have the same problem as the refs - the speed of the modern game can leave them behind. In fact, having four touchies - each controlling a quarter - isn't a bad idea. Much easier to implement than a second ref, and, theoretically, it would guarantee two touchies always up with the play, ready to monitor forward passes and even offside.
I have a real problem with more use of TV refs. The more they're involved, the more interruptions to the game. I think their involvement in deciding on problematic tries is fine, but I'd prefer it left at that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Here come the judge...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:30
|
|
Hey, Tamerlin, I made a reasonably classic Daube last night. Well, we had it last night, but it took 24 hours to prepare. Beef cheeks marinated in a litre of red wine and 500ml of port with aromatic vegetables and herbs for 24 hours. Drain the cheeks, dredge them in flour, brown them and put them into an ovenproof dish. Fry the marinated armomatic vegies, add them to the browned cheeks. Reduce the litre and a half of red wine and port to a syrup, add it to the browned cheeks and vegies. Cover with veal stock, seal the lid on tightly, and put the dish in a 250F oven for 4 hours.
The meat just about melts. Truly sensational!

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by finbar
Hey, Tamerlin, I made a reasonably classic Daube last night. Well, we had it last night, but it took 24 hours to prepare. Beef cheeks marinated in a litre of red wine and 500ml of port with aromatic vegetables and herbs for 24 hours. Drain the cheeks, dredge them in flour, brown them and put them into an ovenproof dish. Fry the marinated armomatic vegies, add them to the browned cheeks. Reduce the litre and a half of red wine and port to a syrup, add it to the browned cheeks and vegies. Cover with veal stock and put the dish in a 250F oven for 4 hours.
The meat just about melts. Truly sensational!
|
Finbar, you are proving everyday that there is at least one educated man in the Southern Hemisphere. 
Caligastia, of course I am impartial, I have no involvement in SH Rugby... that which can not be said about many other posters in this thread. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|