 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
I'm guessing Arnold already has re RE-ELECTION slogan all worked out: "Vote for me. I'll be back."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Yeah it does. If I know his boy is on the ballot I'm going to be even more motivated for someone else to make sure his boy doesn't have a chance to win. |
Where is your back up for Bustamante being "his boy?" Davis didn't choose him, Bustamante was independently elected. He also enjoys significantly higher approval ratings than Davis does.
quote:
No it's not. Bustamante is a career politician. That he'd run is a likely event. People weren't sure what Arnold's intentions were, but now that they know he's serious, you'll see that poll turn around. Not to mention he has more money and visibility than the rest of these yokels. |
First, Bustamante's intentions weren't obvious, as he had previously stated he wouldn't run. Second, Arnold does NOT have more money, as MtG has pointed out to you several times in the other thread, but you keep ignoring: The CA state GOP is practically bankrupt, while the Dems are awash in cash. They outstrip the GOP in funds so bad it isn't funny. Arnie's private cash isn't going to help him against their warchest.
quote: But Arnold was the one who pushed Proposition 49 to victory. |
Oooh, woop-de-doo! So? Sorry, but his supporting an After-School proposition that cost the state $400 million isn't going to have much political clout in a year when the predominant issue is a massive budget deficit. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Where is your back up for Bustamante being "his boy?" Davis didn't choose him, Bustamante was independently elected. He also enjoys significantly higher approval ratings than Davis does. |
Doesn't matter. He's in the same party, and part of the same dumbass administration that bankrupted the state. He's the number 2 guy in charge.
quote:
First, Bustamante's intentions weren't obvious, as he had previously stated he wouldn't run. Second, Arnold does NOT have more money, as MtG has pointed out to you several times in the other thread, but you keep ignoring: The CA state GOP is practically bankrupt, while the Dems are awash in cash. They outstrip the GOP in funds so bad it isn't funny. Arnie's private cash isn't going to help him against their warchest. |
Show me the exact numbers. Until then, the point is "moot" in your words. However, my opinion is more correct than yours so I'm right and you're wrong. 
quote:
Oooh, woop-de-doo! So? Sorry, but his supporting an After-School proposition that cost the state $400 million isn't going to have much political clout in a year when the predominant issue is a massive budget deficit. |
The point is that people voted for the Proposition largely because Arnold backed it. And we ALL KNOW who the real dumbass is who wasted all those billions on stupid sh1t like taking it up the ass from out of state energy companies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Doesn't matter. He's in the same party, and part of the same dumbass administration that bankrupted the state. He's the number 2 guy in charge. |
Exactly, he's a Democrat. California is a solidly Democratic state, Ted. Two Democratic Senators, a Democratic house contigent and the Democrats control the state legislature. The Republicans have virtually no political clout in the state, and Democrats are going to come out in force, either to oppose the recall or to ensure the governorship remains Democratic. Either way, this will be a huge plus for Bustamante. He also will get a natural draw on Hispanic voters, which is a pretty significant part of the California electorate. In fact, without winning at least a bare majority of the Hispanic vote, I'd say a Republican doesn't stand a chance of winning a statewide election in California these days.
quote:
Show me the exact numbers. Until then, the point is "moot" in your words. However, my opinion is more correct than yours so I'm right and you're wrong.  |
No, you're wrong. Nyah.
quote:
The point is that people voted for the Proposition largely because Arnold backed it. And we ALL KNOW who the real dumbass is who wasted all those billions on stupid sh1t like taking it up the ass from out of state energy companies. |
It doesn't matter, though, because nobody in CA is going to give a **** about Proposition 49, which is small potatoes next to the state's other issues and problems.
As for the energy problems, just watch the Dems splash Enron's name all over as the culprit for state woes, and then make the handy tie of the current Republican administration to Enron's fallen leaders. That will certainly entice CA voters to go for the GOP, suuuuuure!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|