 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Ned:
"However, they owe their prior owners just compensation."
Well that depends on how they acquired their property. I don't know the details of how US companies got their property in Cuba - anyone know?
"Expropriation of property without compensation is a violation of international law"
Without just compensation, it is. So is invading another country unless you act in self defense against an immanent threat. Just for example.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Jack, no one doubts that governments have a right to expropriate property for social or other purposes. However, they owe their prior owners just compensation |
The US corporations refused the compensation offered them, 20-year bonds. As in Guatemala five years earlier, the problem stemmed from the vale of the property the companies reported to the government for taxation pruposes. Since Company X said it was worth 5 million dollars for taxation purposes, the government offered them five million dollars worth of twenty-year bonds (which would grow in value with interest, do know the rate Cuba offered). Problem for the companies was, they had been cheating the previous Cuban government by lowballing the value of their companies, so that company that claimed to be worth five million was actually worth twenty million. Honestly, I'm sorry but they ****ed themselves.
The another group of Americans with claims on Cuban proerty were American gangsters. I hope I'm not alone in thinking those claims don't need to be recognized. Just because property was legally purchased, if it was done with illegal proceeds, I don't think you have a legitimate claim.
The final group of Americans who have property claims in Cuba are former the former rulers of Cuba and their henchmen who have become U.S. citizens. Since the seizure of property predates their becoming American citizens, should we really have say in the matter? If the government takes my property, I move to Canada and become a citizan, should Canada intervene with the US on my behalf? No.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
PLATO

|
 |
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002 time: 23:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
The US corporations refused the compensation offered them, 20-year bonds. As in Guatemala five years earlier, the problem stemmed from the vale of the property the companies reported to the government for taxation pruposes. Since Company X said it was worth 5 million dollars for taxation purposes, the government offered them five million dollars worth of twenty-year bonds (which would grow in value with interest, do know the rate Cuba offered). Problem for the companies was, they had been cheating the previous Cuban government by lowballing the value of their companies, so that company that claimed to be worth five million was actually worth twenty million. Honestly, I'm sorry but they ****ed themselves.
The another group of Americans with claims on Cuban proerty were American gangsters. I hope I'm not alone in thinking those claims don't need to be recognized. Just because property was legally purchased, if it was done with illegal proceeds, I don't think you have a legitimate claim.
The final group of Americans who have property claims in Cuba are former the former rulers of Cuba and their henchmen who have become U.S. citizens. Since the seizure of property predates their becoming American citizens, should we really have say in the matter? If the government takes my property, I move to Canada and become a citizan, should Canada intervene with the US on my behalf? No. |
On the money che! (Never thought I would say that.)
The vast amount of illegal money that was funnelled into Cuba and protected by the Batista regime is, IMO, one of the causes of the revolution. It is sad to say, but the Cuban people were being exploited. One of the very very few benefits of a totalitarian regime is its ability to end these types of arrangements. That being said, Cuba has ****ed itself in many ways by not trying to do things that will lead to an end of the embargo.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
Ned:
"However, they owe their prior owners just compensation."
Well that depends on how they acquired their property. I don't know the details of how US companies got their property in Cuba - anyone know? |
By and large they purchased it legally. In the case of the US mob, they bought it legally in Cuba, but used the proceeds of illegal activities in the US to do so. No doubt, in some cases, during the periods of direct US administration and the subsequent period when Cuba was ostensibly free but the actual ruler of Cuba was the US ambassador, no doubt U.S. companies and persons were given unfair advantages in aquiring property in Cuba.
Ned, to really understand U.S.-Cuban relations, you have to go back to the 1st part of the 20th Century. It's true that since the begining of the U.S., we've coveted that island. Jefferson said the island should naturally belong to the U.S. During the 1890s, the Cuban people revolted a final time, and were winning the war. Cuba would eithe have achieved autonomy (like Puerto Rico) or full independence.
Americans generally supported the Cuban cause, as Americans themselves are instinctive anti-imperialists (at least as far as other empires are concerned). We sent a battleship to Cuba to let Spain know we were prepared to protect American lives and property in Cuba, and then the damned thing blew up.
Those who wanted to add Cuba to the U.S. seized upon the sinking of the Maine as a pretext to annex Cuba before it gained independence (it's better to take a colony from someone else than steal an independent country). We all know how the war went, but during the war, Congress passed a law that forbade the U.S. from annexing Cuba.
Instead we took over the island as a protectorate, it was ostensibly an indendent country, but we were "preparing" it for independence. That lasted until 1904. While Cuba was writing it's Constitution, we presented them with the Platt Amendment. We told them it had to be added to their Constitution or who knew how long it was take the Americans to leave. Reluctantly, Cuba accepted the amendment.
The Platt Amendment gave the U.S. a permanent lease at Guantanimo Bay. Only we have the right to cancel it. It also gave the U.S. the right to intervene in Cuba for any reason. It basically just legalized in Cuba the same sort of activity the US was continually engaged in around the Caribbean. And the US used it several times to invade and "restore order" or toss out a government it didn't like. It has always been hated by the Cuban people, and they have a new Constitution now, with no Platt Amendment (but they obviously can't throw the U.S. out of Guantanimo if it doesn't want to leave).
The whole history of Cuban-American relstions in the 20th Century basically necessitates that any Cuban government is going to be at best cool towards the US and at worst openly hostile. Anyone who wants any chance at being taken seriously in Cuba politically is going to have to be anti-US, even in a post-Communist Cuba.
Given our history, is it any wonder why the Cuba people prefer Castro to anything we propose? He may be a bastard, but he's their bastard.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO
Touche.
Here it is then. Cuba has recovered well from the fall of the USSR. They have been quietly garnering allies and friends in central and south america. Their present form of government is entrenched and will likely survive Castro. IMO, economic pressure will increase on them to formulate change only when the embargo is lifted. The US will do this, but only after Castro's demise. It will happen in stages that will appear to benefit the expatriates in order not to lose their support. Eventually the government in Cuba will eithier reform or become economically dependent on the US. Should the later happen, then the chances of a Batista like regime coming to power increase.
The impact of dissidents is hard to gauge in a post-Castro cuba because the strategic alliances that will bring them power will most likely have ties with some in the current government. This is impossible to tell at this juncture due to the closed nature of the current government. |
Returning the favor, I have to agree with everything here Plato has said.
I think that once the embargo is ended, it will be much harder for Cuba to maintain it's current economic system, with litterally tens fo billions of dollars of American money chaffing at the bit to be invested in Cuba. Properly managed, the Cubans might be able to make some sort of arrangement with capitalism and still keep the best features of their socialist system, but I don't really think they can. Castro would be able to do it, and that's probably why we're waiting for him to die, so that he won't be able to lay the foundation for a hybrid system that can survive without him.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
Hasn't anyone noticed that the Miami Cubans are mostly conservatives. I am sick of thier anti-Castro BS. |
I would temper that by saying most vocal Cuban-Americans are conservative or further right. There are many Cubans who do not agree with th leadership of the Cuban community here in the U.S., but it is not safe to say it out loud. It could easily result in you or your family members losing a job, getting physically harrased or assaulted, having your house or business burned down, or killed. When I say that there are terrorists openly walking the streets of Miami, I am not joking. If they're willing to committ acts of terror against Cuba, there and in other countries, why should they stop just because they are in the U.S.?
Heck, in Chicago a theater company tried to put on a play about Che Guevara. First their theater burned down. Then the Mexican resteraunt where they were going to move the play to started getting threats. The play was canceled. These people do not play around, and because the U.S. government wants their suport both politically and as a thorn in Castro's side, they don't do anything about it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:30
|
|
"Just as a personal comment, I find it very difficult to stay a member of this forum. The leftist bullcraps is so deep here that it is really depressing."
What I find odd is that this is the case and that this is a Civ forum. These people should be the ones versed in history, competition... Instead they're the type that suckle at the *** of government, drinking the milk of those that earned it...or support such stuff.
Though they are in denial of course, behind all sorts of high sounding excuses. So... you get places like California where the paycheck sucking vampires have chased out the business, and their last hope is a republican action hero...
I have a friend that has an ex-wife who gets $1700 a month from California because they decided she's crazy. I've never met her, maybe she is. Anyway, she's moved down to Brazil where her $1700 is a kings ransom, and is building herself a mansion. Well, is she crazy or are the Cali liberals who spend other peoples money in this fashion?
It's a rhetorical question of course. 
That said I don't find it "really depressing" as you do Ned. With the nations conservative shift, it's more humorous than depressing. Also, better here than out in the street...
Last edited by Lancer on 10-08-2003 at 07:32
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lancer
"Just as a personal comment, I find it very difficult to stay a member of this forum. The leftist bullcraps is so deep here that it is really depressing."
What I find odd is that this is the case and that this is a Civ forum. These people should be the ones versed in history, competition... Instead they're the type that suckle at the *** of government, drinking the milk of those that earned it...or support such stuff. |
Are you for real? Most of the lefties on this forum are quite moderate (excluding myself and the other members of the CPA). The problem is you ultra-right Americans and Boddingtons. You are so out of touch with the rest of the world, that you seem to think that people who support public libraries are crypto-Stalinists.
quote: Though they are in denial of course, behind all sorts of high sounding excuses. So... you get places like California where the paycheck sucking vampires have chased out the business, and their last hope is a republican action hero... |
Who'll get elected and then be completely unprepared to deal with the crisis as it stands. It boggles the mind that anyone, let alone a half-witted illiterate womanising Austrian, would be interested in taking on the job.
quote: I have a friend that has an ex-wife who gets $1700 a month from California because they decided she's crazy. I've never met her, maybe she is. |
Probably, if she wants to live in Brazil.
quote: Anyway, she's moved down to Brazil where her $1700 is a kings ransom, and is building herself a mansion. Well, is she crazy or are the Cali liberals who spend other peoples money in this fashion? |
So there's a problem with the policy. Isn't agitating for change the best thing to do rather than throwing out the baby with the bathwater: i.e. you collect it as long as you stay in the United States.
"Other people's money"? Are you telling me you don't benefit from lowering the number of crazy homeless people roaming the streets?
quote: That said I don't find it "really depressing" as you do Ned. With the nations conservative shift, it's more humorous than depressing. Also, better here than out in the street... |
You see, your "nation". No-one else really believes this kind of crap anymore. That's why nobody likes you. Don't blame the left.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Here's a story on the bleakness of life in Castro's socialist paradise which the communist party blames solely on the US embargo.
|
So lift the embargo and take away Castro's prime excuse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
It's seen with great amusement.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|