 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
I did not edit that post.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Saras:
Ok, a little more:
Sovereignty is a fluffy concept, but usually associated with "country". So is Idoha sovereign? Or Germany?
The question for the EU is whether member states are still sovereign. The best description is split sovereignty.
The EU is a federal structure, not a free trade area, not just a costums union, not just an economic union.
Nation - nationalism and the nation state have seen their climax, wouldn't you agree?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Saras
|
 |
Vilnius, Lithuania
Apr 1999 time: 06:30
|
|
You have to understand this kind of discussion is NOT my strongest area, but:
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
Saras:
Ok, a little more:
Sovereignty is a fluffy concept, but usually associated with "country". So is Idoha sovereign? Or Germany? |
Idaho is not sovereign. It can't delcare war, make peace, annex Iowa. Germany, in theory, can.
quote: The question for the EU is whether member states are still sovereign. The best description is split sovereignty.
The EU is a federal structure, not a free trade area, not just a costums union, not just an economic union.
Nation - nationalism and the nation state have seen their climax, wouldn't you agree? |
IMO, EU is integrated economically, but not politically, at least not to the same degree. You have to have some political integration to run all the common things in the EU. I just wish someone threw the French out (hint - CAP )
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
I can guarantee you the Balkan states will not sign on. And a true EU would need all of Europe. |
You mean you're living not in the true United States of America, because they don't cover all of America?
On topic: It will happen, but in small steps and it will take a very long time. It may begin with a loose confederation of just a few countries, let's call it core Europe. With the time, and over a large amount of political skirmishes and diskussions (I know thee, Europe), the bonds will tighten. Others will eventually join, even the Britons, although without doubt they will be the last and join kicking and screaming and only because they otherwise would be dwarfed and "milled" between Europe and America. Others, like the Balkan states, may decide not to join, so what? They'll be our Mexico then, no big deal. And if the Finns don't join, they will be our Canada.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saras
We (as well as probably everyone) already extradite to US and Russian and a bunch of other places, and have bilateral treaties etc. EU takes it just one small step further, no?
|
It provides common rules for extradition, but that is just one aspect of the Acquis in that area.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
it seems to me that the EU, whatever it is, may represent a future organizational model. |
Yes, the nation state sucked up all authority to a central level. We are now seeing a reversal, in a way it's a return to a multilevel system of local, regional, national, supranational and international systems.
The EU is a new federal system that is less centralized than the classic federal state, but goes beyond the confederation. To some extent similar models have been there before, the Deutscher Bund from 1815-1866, or the US before the civil war. They became nation states eventually, but I don't see that road for the EU.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Yeah, but we'd need time travel for that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
Exactly why wouldn't the Balkan states join? AFAIK Slovenia and Croatia already have candidate status (not sure about Bosnia or Macedonia).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
The EU is best seen as an intermediate step. Sure, it is bringing economic union, a large degree of legal and border policing co-operation but not political union. The problem is that the national politicians in all the major EU countries don't want to give up the pretence of having some power so they will desperately hang on to foreign policy.
Within the next 10-15 years there will not be a single EU state. In the longer term demographic and economic pressures may well make the present, generally socialist, policies unsustainable (= unaffordable) and a new political approach, possibly a new pan-national political party taking power in several countries could bring change leading to a true single state.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|