Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization IV > Civ4-General > Squares, Hexes, Octagons...
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
22.Sep: BLUE IS OCEAN, GREEN IS GRASS
22.Sep: SMAC-LIKE UN COUNCIL CONFIRMED
21.Sep: GERMAN `ANONYMOUS` LAUNCHES

bottom of page
  
whatcha like? (Time out:0 days after 11-08-2003, 09:51)
Squares
Hexagons
Octagons
Other... please post.
View Results [Edit Poll (moderators only)]
Author
Thread   
Pages (8): [ <<   4   5   6   7   8   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Platypus Rex is offline Platypus Rex

King
Give Blood..Give Life- just 20 min.. Woodland,CA
Sep 2002
time: 21:30
  Old Post 03-07-2004 01:27 Visit Platypus Rex<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#181 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

I think they are on there way using LOS

Because when you are on top of a hill, you see farther, and you dont see units until they are your ZOC, depending on terrain

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 03-07-2004 09:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#182 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

I suppose the Civ3 approach to LOS is adequete.

Lord God Jinnai is offline Lord God Jinnai
Prince
St. Louis
Sep 1999
time: 23:30
  Old Post 01-08-2004 11:10 Visit Lord God Jinnai's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#183 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Actually i think point-to-point vector based movement would be way to go.

Failing that triagles are better than any of the 3 listed, but are a poor substiute to p2p based movement.

conmcb25 is offline conmcb25

Emperor
Angmar
Aug 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 02-08-2004 00:30 Visit conmcb25<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#184 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Squares

Leland is offline Leland
Prince

Jan 2000
time: 07:30
  Old Post 02-08-2004 04:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#185 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by Lord God Jinnai
Actually i think point-to-point vector based movement would be way to go.

The problem with p2p movement would be that this system wouldn't have any fixed lower resolution. Let's say that the distance between two units is 13 kilometers, and one of them is moving in a 34 degree angle at 50 kilometers per turn and the other one in 74 degree angle at 100 kilometers per turn... figuring out when and how these units will meet exactly would be a nasty math problem instead of a fairly straightforward tactical decision. It's much easier to grasp simple tile based movement, be it squares or hexes or irregular regions.

StormSeed is offline StormSeed
Settler

Jul 2004
time: 05:30
  Old Post 02-08-2004 15:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#186 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I vote for other:

The tiles of the map can be hexagonal, but the actual movement should be on a half-sized triangular grid, with all movement speeds doubled to make up for half size.

If the interface is handled correctly, twelve directions can be emulated, by making them up from combinations of two triangular movements.

code:
o o o o . o . . o X o . . o . o o o o


X is where you start. o is max where you can move to with 1x2=2 movement points.

Okay, it's very much like a hex grid now that I actually look at it. But you asked my opinion, and here it is.

Last edited by StormSeed on 02-08-2004 at 16:03

Lord God Jinnai is offline Lord God Jinnai
Prince
St. Louis
Sep 1999
time: 23:30
  Old Post 03-08-2004 15:59 Visit Lord God Jinnai's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#187 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Leland

The problem with p2p movement would be that this system wouldn't have any fixed lower resolution. Let's say that the distance between two units is 13 kilometers, and one of them is moving in a 34 degree angle at 50 kilometers per turn and the other one in 74 degree angle at 100 kilometers per turn... figuring out when and how these units will meet exactly would be a nasty math problem instead of a fairly straightforward tactical decision. It's much easier to grasp simple tile based movement, be it squares or hexes or irregular regions.
Howso would you be forced into 1 resolution if its vector-based? And if you give all units an area of conflict they don't haveto be so exact on where they cross either.

Leland is offline Leland
Prince

Jan 2000
time: 07:30
  Old Post 04-08-2004 01:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#188 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Lord God Jinnai
Howso would you be forced into 1 resolution if its vector-based? And if you give all units an area of conflict they don't haveto be so exact on where they cross either.

Areas of conflict don't change the situation; it's still confusing to the player to figure out when the radii of two units collide than where the actual trajectories of the units collide. Besides not all units are hostile to each other so sometimes the radii are going to be ignored anyway.

As for the resolution, I'm not sure whether you understood my point: I meant that the problem is that there isn't a single resolution if the movement is completely vector based. On the other hand, if you do impose a single resolution (for example by making all moves begin and end on a grid; a reasonable choice because the terrain has to consist of some sort of polygonal mesh anyway), I don't see the real advantage of vector based movement in the first place.

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 06-08-2004 09:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#189 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Leland

The problem with p2p movement would be that this system wouldn't have any fixed lower resolution. Let's say that the distance between two units is 13 kilometers, and one of them is moving in a 34 degree angle at 50 kilometers per turn and the other one in 74 degree angle at 100 kilometers per turn... figuring out when and how these units will meet exactly would be a nasty math problem instead of a fairly straightforward tactical decision. It's much easier to grasp simple tile based movement, be it squares or hexes or irregular regions.


You could always set an intercept course as a vector. (ie. select the unit as a destination (even if it is moving) instead of selecting a map coordinate or waypoint.)

Fatwreck is offline Fatwreck
Prince
Sweden
Jun 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 06-08-2004 18:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#190 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

I´m liking the idea of hexes in civ

Quezacotl06 is offline Quezacotl06
Warlord

Feb 2004
time: 05:30
  Old Post 21-10-2004 05:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#191 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

if it was hex ud have to go zig-zag when u were going left and right, it'd be wierd.

But maybe you could make it appear to be gridless, but let it be octagonal under it. Like u could click on a unit and point anywhere on the map, and it would tell u the amount of turns to get there. But when its moving, it follows the octagonal pattern.

Last edited by Quezacotl06 on 21-10-2004 at 06:10

star mouse is offline star mouse
Prince
of the Barbarians
Aug 2001
time: 16:30
  Old Post 21-10-2004 07:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#192 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Quezacotl06
if it was hex ud have to go zig-zag when u were going left and right, it'd be wierd.

No more weird than a square grid where moving diagonally uses up no more movement points even though the distance is 1.4 times as far.

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 22-10-2004 11:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#193 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by star mouse

No more weird than a square grid where moving diagonally uses up no more movement points even though the distance is 1.4 times as far.


Xorbon is offline Xorbon
Prince
Guelph, ON
Jul 2003
time: 00:30
  Old Post 22-10-2004 17:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#194 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Whay are people still bringing up octagons? They won't work! You can't tile with octagons without using small diamonds or squares as fillers. And we already have octagonal (8-directional) movement with squares!

Sorry if I sound condescending. I'm not trying to be. But we only really have two choices: squares or hexes. (Though I suppose triangles could be a 3rd choice.)

That being said, hexes would be the best choice!

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 23-10-2004 10:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#195 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Xorbon
But we only really have two choices: squares or hexes. (Though I suppose triangles could be a 3rd choice.)

That being said, hexes would be the best choice!


Actually, vector movement would be the best choice but probably the most difficult to implement. If we must have some kind of grid movement then yes, hexes are the best.

MxM is offline MxM
Warlord
Planet Earth, Solar System
Jan 2000
time: 00:30
  Old Post 23-10-2004 13:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#196 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I propose very simple solution. Gmm. Actually not that simple

Attachment: tile.jpg
This has been downloaded 94 time(s).

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 23-10-2004 15:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#197 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Looks like that would be great for keeping out small animals.

zorbop is offline zorbop
Warlord
st louis
Jan 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 26-10-2004 05:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#198 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

I like hexagons better, but if they are used, it just won't feel like civ...

Straybow is offline Straybow
Emperor
SG(2)… gone but not forgotten
Jan 1970
time: 23:30
  Old Post 26-10-2004 10:55 Visit Straybow's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#199 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Yeah, a tessaract map!

Level is offline Level
Warlord
Utah, USA
May 2002
time: 22:30
  Old Post 27-10-2004 00:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#200 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Triangles would work better then Hex for the keybord, but it may be confuising.

Attachment: triangle.gif
This has been downloaded 78 time(s).

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 27-10-2004 03:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#201 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by Straybow
Yeah, a tessaract map!


A 4D map?

Straybow is offline Straybow
Emperor
SG(2)… gone but not forgotten
Jan 1970
time: 23:30
  Old Post 27-10-2004 04:11 Visit Straybow's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#202 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

That's what MxM's map grid looks like to me.

Xorbon is offline Xorbon
Prince
Guelph, ON
Jul 2003
time: 00:30
  Old Post 27-10-2004 08:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#203 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Straybow
Yeah, a tessaract map!


The only problem with that kind of map is, if you make a wrong turn with a unit, it could end up 5 turns in the future.

Or you could send your tanks to the past...

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 27-10-2004 09:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#204 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Or appear anywhere on the map...
(Space movement in CtP does that to some degree)

Leland is offline Leland
Prince

Jan 2000
time: 07:30
  Old Post 30-10-2004 15:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#205 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

It would be interesting to see a strategy game where time travel is a component. A real component, not just a scripted story element, so that you could beat your enemy by sending tanks to smash his capital when it was still a small village.

punkbass2000 is offline punkbass2000
King
Waterloo, ON, Canada
Feb 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 30-10-2004 19:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#206 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

That would be impossible. How would the game know at 4000BC that in 2100AD you're going to invent a time machine and return to kill them? They would have had to have been eliminted immediately or else there would be no continuity. Not to mention that if that scenario did occur, it probably wouldn't strike you as necessary to then go back in time to destroy a civ that had never existed from your perspective. Plus, you would just destroy every civ this way as soon as your crew got to 4000BC and the game would be over before it started.

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-10-2004 01:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#207 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

And therefor you wouldn't need to go back in time, etc., etc.

Adromel is offline Adromel
Settler
Nova Scotia
Nov 2004
time: 05:30
  Old Post 21-11-2004 02:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#208 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by punkbass2000
That would be impossible. How would the game know at 4000BC that in 2100AD you're going to invent a time machine and return to kill them? They would have had to have been eliminted immediately or else there would be no continuity. Not to mention that if that scenario did occur, it probably wouldn't strike you as necessary to then go back in time to destroy a civ that had never existed from your perspective. Plus, you would just destroy every civ this way as soon as your crew got to 4000BC and the game would be over before it started.


I agree that it's a shady idea. A positive outlook could say that when the game starts...that is the beginning of time. That mindset solves the cordiality loop. With a temperal aspect added to the game one would need the ability to defend against such attacks. Such as spies revealing spies. "Time" travelling units could be a new platform of combat...a new evolution. A little more dangerous than when a Civ. starts running with nukes.

Panzeh is offline Panzeh
Chieftain

Jan 2004
time: 05:30
  Old Post 21-11-2004 04:39 Visit Panzeh's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#209 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

It'd be kind of cheap that whenever the game starts, you see m1s rolling through your initial town.

Vince278 is offline Vince278
King

Dec 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 21-11-2004 11:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#210 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

We've discussed going back in time but how about forward? This is more easily done and without those paradox problems.

For example: You reach a tech that allows you to build a Time Portal in a town. You can then send units forward through this portal to any time and location desired (say 1-20 turns). On the lowest setting it effectively gives you instantanous movement to anywhere on the globe. On the higher settings it would allow you to mass troops anywhere on the globe. I'd limit it in a way similar to airlifts, perhaps 1 unit per point of origin per turn.

 
Pages (8): [ <<   4   5   6   7   8   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.
Apolyton Time is 00:30.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0670 seconds (92.93% PHP - 7.07% MySQL) with 33 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net