 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Ok, I thought I's try and answer some of the questions:
A (for advanced) levels are school leavers exams, almost entirely used for University Entrance. Consider them like SATIIs, but taken a year after (year 13), and so a little harder. It's a two year course, that's split into one year of Advanced Subsidiary (AS) levels, and one year A2 levels. Both count equally and make up an A level. An A level is about 5/6 hours per week work, and about 3 hours for extra study. Grades run from E to A, with a U for unclassified.
GCSEs are exams that everyone takes in year 11 (at 16). they are a two year course, and you commonly take between 8 and 13 of them. A full GCSE is about 3 hours per week lessons, with about 1 hour per week extra study. Grades run from F up to A*, with a U for unclasified. Most jobs/6th forms require at least 5 grade A*-Cs. Slightly below US leaving qualifications.
GNVQs are General National Vocational Qualifications, and come in 3 levels, foundation, intermediate and higher. The foundation counts as 5 GCSEs, the intermediate as 2 A Levels, and the higher at diploma level. The grades are pass (Es), merit (Cs) and distinction (As). There are also NVQs (National Vocational Qualifications) which are exactly like GNVQs, but in different subjects. Subjects include things like 'leisure and tourism', business studies and engineering. Foundation is a one year course, intermediate is 2 and higher is 3 IIRC. NVQs are usually taken alongside working, done part time, in such a scheme as a Young Apprenticeship.
HNDs are Higher National Diplomas, and are a little like GNVQs. They differ in being more academic than NVQs, but less academic than A levels, in things like Computer Science. Won't get you into university (usually) but good for going into technical professions. HNCs are Higher National Certificates, and a bit like HNDs. In fact, I'm not sure of the exact difference 
BTECs are like HNDs, but usually more technical. they stand for British Training and Education Council qualifications.
And for those that care, I've failed my offer. Apparently AABB is not good enough, even with a doctors note stating I was sick during my exams (my offer was AAA, although they often accept less when the time comes, just not in my case ) Thus I shall not be going to Oxford this year Whereas my friend who got the same grades as me, but with the extras I did, get's in, because she got an AAB offer. Such is life.
I wish all those going the best of luck, and much congratulations to Immortal Wombat who is off to the best College at Cambridge 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:30
|
|
Why dont we just do an "intelligence map" of each person, basically like an IQ but with more dimensions, i.e. a rating for mathematical skill, tech skill, english, comms, foreign langs, critical thinking, art etc etc etc.
In that sense, its a universal rating. Dont get me wrong, I think qualifications and intelligence quotiants suck and are not representative, but are good as perhaps a rough guide to some suit who needs to put you in a box. If you're going to have qualification-like systems, this is the best way. If you want to specialise, you simply raise your rating in a specific area, or add another dimension if its really specific (like particle physics or something).
EDIT: This would be built up over time, analogous to the current system of wide exams, then specifics, although obviously more continuous and flexible per each student.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:30
|
|
balls, DP.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|