 |
|
Richard Bruns
|
|
NC, USA
Nov 1999 time: 06:30
|
|
I have read quite a bit of Heinlien, and the best way I can describe him is "militant libertarian." The one thing he hates more than anything else is rules and laws telling people what to do, and he has a very strong "might makes right" mentality.
He more or less bluntly states in "The moon is a harsh mistress" that the way to make an ideal society is to let people kill each other off until only about a fifth of the population is left.
He is a good writer, and sometimes very subtle. He is a good propagandist, and can worm his attitude and beliefs into the readers' minds if they are not careful. But they are still fun books to read, if you understand and avoid his attempted manipulation of your beliefs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rex Little
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TCO
I personally found that the latter stories became too much of a game where the hero had no constraints. Everything from that brain transfer one on...except for Friday. In Friday, there was more dramatic tension. It was less of a galivanting around and more of a real person caught in a bad situation. A little less like a god having fun and more like a real person fighting, learning, living. I can care about that. | You nailed the problem with Heinlein's later work. The Number of the Beast-- in particular was completely deuces wild, no limits on what could happen. Friday was indeed the only book after that which read like vintage Heinlein--and vintage Heinlein is the best science fiction ever written.
Regarding the notion that Heinlein was a fascist, Spider Robinson (an excellent SF writer himself and a huge fan of Heinlein) wrote the following:
"This is the most popular Heinlein shibboleth in fandom, particularly among the young--and, of course, exclusively among the ignorant. I seldom bother to reply, but in this instance I am being paid. Dear sir or madam: kindly go to the library, look up the dictionary definition of fascism. For good measure, read the history of fascism, asking the librarian to help you with any big words. Then read the works of Robert Heinlein, which you plainly have not done yet. If out of 42 books you can produce one shred of evidence that Heinlein--or any of his protagonists--is a fascist, I'll eat my copy of Heinlein in Dimension."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
-Jrabbit
|
 |
of the Electronic Egyptians
Feb 2002 time: 23:30
|
|
Heinlein has good writing skills.
But he's politically one-dimensional, certainly misogynist, and, for long stretches, was doggedly formulaic.
I prefer Samuel Delaney for sheer unbounded creativity, Roger Zelazny for pure fun, Philip K. Dlck for altenative reality, and Robert Forward for "real science" sci-fi.
Asimov is very admirable, always had great concepts, very well thought-out, but never grabbed me with his actual writing.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|