Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Iraq - Terrorism or Homeland Defence?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Iraq - Terrorism or Homeland Defence? Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Firstly may I appologise if this topic has come up before, I guess it has but given the escalating level of attacks perhaps the discussion can continue anyway.

Im afraid to say I look at it on the side of Homeland Defence, I am sure if USA or any other country attacked the UK (or any other country) and occupied the nation much of the inhabitants would resent the occupation and there would be a minority willing to take up arms in the struggle. I would certainly do what I could to undermine and disrupt and regime which had imposed itself in similar circumstances.

I am sick and tired of hearing the news channels, papers etc etc refering to the bombings and shootings as terrorist acts. It may be true that foreign nationals and other mulims are going to Iraq to support the specific religeous groups etc but I see not difference in this than what happend in France, Hungary, Poland etc in WW2 the so called "Resistance" was also supported by supplies, intelligence and many other means by both UK and USA in these instances.

Terrorism is only war by unconventional means, im sorry to say that even includes the attacks at WTC and many less destructive but never the less horrific acts carried out by the IRA.

Im not saying I support so called Terrorism but the Governments of the world need to wake up and look at why their foreign policies cause people to get so desperate they are willing to give their lives for what they believe in (however misguided).

The situation is Iraq will probably rumble on for generations now, its time we seriously review "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and see how we can sort out this MESS.

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Oops forgot to mention I am fully behind our troops but they have an impossible job, its the gun hoe polititians at fault, errm MR Bush (and partly Blair who did it for the right reasons but may loose his job over it).

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Barley: Two of the people who were caught after the latest bombing in Iraq whick killed 95 confessed to being members of Al Qaeda.

Ted Striker is offline Ted Striker
Emperor
United States of America
Jan 1970
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:52 Visit Ted Striker's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

oh shut up barley you turncoat backstabber

mrmitchell is offline mrmitchell
King

Donate to the Red Cross

Sep 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Terrorism is usually defined as "Acts targeting civilians meant to strike fear into a population" BTW

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 03:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

"Turncoat Backstabber"!

I never supported the war in the first place. Its was un-just, I dont want to revel in the glory of this disasterous situation as I dont see what is worthwhile about spending $2 Trillion & 15 soldiers lives a week on a country where it is becoming clearer by the day that the majority of the population dont want us their.

This will go down as one of the most misguided episodes in the 21st century.

- oh and ill leave you to explan what you think im a backstabber......

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 04:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

I get you Ted thanks for that, I forgot about the Civilian issue.

I could argue to cases in favour of attacking civilians - not that I support or believe in them but I like a good argument so here goes.

1) Definition of Terrorism as attacks on Civilians is a moralistic self indulgance of Democracies and other advanced social styles in which I mean we judge by our own ideals that have developed through history to what they are today. In that history all nations including UK & USA have committed many many equivilant acts of "Terrorism" against civillians, its is only our morality that has changed. Others in the world have different levels of morality, we look to impose our will on the world and expect all to play by our rules - not liekley I think.

2) If your desperate and your opponent is strong you will resort to whatever means you have to hurt them. Would you break the law to get revenge on someone? its not the same level but its the same principle.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 04:25 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

U.N. Resolution 1441

http://www.un.int/usa/sres-iraq.htm

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 04:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by Barley
worthwhile about spending $2 Trillion & 15 soldiers lives a week on a country where it is becoming clearer by the day that the majority of the population dont want us their.


$2 trillion and 15 soldiers per week? are you out of your gord? You don't have a clue of what you're talking about.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 04:29 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Barley, you're mistaken on all counts.

JCG is offline JCG
Prince
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 04:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Does killing one of the leaders of your country's majority religion, not to mention a lot of innocent bystanders and churchgoers (insert equivalent islamic term), count as "homeland defense" too?

I understand the reasoning behind your post to a degree, but that's a long way from ever saying: "since terrorism is just another means of making war then it's ok to do ANYTHING in order to win/get the occupiers out".

That's giving them a blank check to do whatever the hell they want, in a sense.

Besides, you simply cannot (or rather shouldn't, as you are free to try, of course) successfully group all those instances and situations together in a serious argument, unless you're being intentionally vague. They are very different, if you look at the finer details (and not just limit yourself to saying "they are all opposition movements and that's it").

If you ask me, it's BOTH terrorism and homeland defense in the case of Iraq, but that doesn't change the fact that it's not doing any good for the people of Iraq themselves. The US could and should change its way of handling things though.

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Guess I am trying to start an argument / stimulate conversation I suppose. maybe ive been a bit dramatic but im trying to present all sides not just my feelings.

$2 Trillion and 15 Soliers is what the operation is costing UK/USA per week.

mrmitchell is offline mrmitchell
King

Donate to the Red Cross

Sep 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

$2 Trillion? Are you sure?

EDIT: D'oh. Brits use different powers of 10 for billion, trillion, don't they?

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Barley
$2 Trillion and 15 Soliers is what the operation is costing UK/USA per week.


Clueless. Utterly clueless. The figure from the start of the war to today is around $100 billion for the US (that's 1/20 of your claimed weekly cost) and there's been one injuried or killed per day since the beginning of occupation (only about 500 Allied soldiers were killed during the entire invasion). Also a large percentage of those allied dead or wounded got they way in accidents or desiese not through combat opporations. The peace time force has a very similiar accident rate. It is disingenious to try to blame auto accidents upon the invasion. Especially since they also happen in peace time.

I believe it was Lazerous & the Gimp who asked what the difference between the peace time and occupiation accident rates were. I don't know but I'd bet they were very close to one another.

Last edited by Oerdin on 31-08-2003 at 05:41

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by mrmitchell
$2 Trillion? Are you sure?

EDIT: D'oh. Brits use different powers of 10 for billion, trillion, don't they?


No, I don't think so. Trillion always means the third place (I.E. million, billion, trillion).

It is absolutely absured to say the cost was $2 trillion. The US war cost was $70 billion and according to the GAO the occupation costs to date are around $30 billion. So the US total is around $100 billion. Does anyone seriously believe the UK and Australia have spent $1.9 billion on the war (roughly 2 times their combined GDP)? That would mean they spent 19 times what the US spent.

Of course not. The claim is entirely uneducated.

Last edited by Oerdin on 31-08-2003 at 05:42

PLATO is offline PLATO

King
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Here is the difference between the terrorist and the resistors. The terrorist are fighting to preserve or install an autocratic form of governing based upon the oppression of various different groups and the determination of the fate of the majority. Resistors are those who are fighting against them-trying to reinstall or preserve a system in which the collective will of the people is being supported

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

eek I did mean billion sorry guys - thats err 2,000,000,000.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Well, then you are still wrong. $2 billion is no where near the right figure. The US has spent $100 billion and the UK and Australia together (mostly the UK though) has spent around $20 billion. The grande total is around $120 billion to date.

Barley is offline Barley
Prince
England
Feb 2002
time: 05:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 05:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Yes but $2 is the cost of the operation each week. The cost of the initial assult until ceasefilre was jointly about $90 Bil from start until fall of Bagdad.

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:30
  Old Post 31-08-2003 06:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Barley is correct, that the US is spending on average 2 billion a week in the occupation of Iraq. none of this has yet to go in the budget, of course. Several news agencies have reported this figure. Think of it, 30 billion isnce the end of th war (May 1st): that has been what, 4 months, 16 weeks, into 30 billion? whats 16 weeks divided into 30 billion? About 2 billion a week. Oh, and Bremer just came home to ask for an extra 3 billion on TOP of the weekly costs.

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 03-09-2003 03:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:

I am sick and tired of hearing the news channels, papers etc etc refering to the bombings and shootings as terrorist acts. It may be true that foreign nationals and other mulims are going to Iraq to support the specific religeous groups etc but I see not difference in this than what happend in France, Hungary, Poland etc in WW2 the so called "Resistance" was also supported by supplies, intelligence and many other means by both UK and USA in these instances.


First of all, Hungary played on German side. As well as France to a big extent -except for commies and very little at the start supporters of de Gaulle.

And there is a big difference. Americans and their allies are not questioning the souvereignity of Iraq, they do not claim for its territory, and thereare other ways of criticising them, in the press, on the streats...

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.
Apolyton Time is 00:30.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0532 seconds (91.02% PHP - 8.98% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net