 |
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
I disagree. UK Conservatism is inherently far less conservative and right-wing than conservatism in the USA. Organisations such as CPAC (http://www.cpac.org/) are very much part of the mainstream in the States - I believe Cheney addressed their conference this year - whereas their approximate equivalents over here have long since been chucked out of the Conservative Party for their unacceptable views. Right-wing members of Conservative Way Forward (the Thatcherite wing, for whom I have little time) have travelled to CPAC and other US conservative events and been appalled.
There is a very strong core of classical liberalism within the UK Conservative Party that seemingly barely exists within the Republicans. I'm a card-carrying Tory but I'd never vote Republican in the States. |
Yup. You might be able to integrate the center-half of the Reps into the Tories as their right wing, but the other half would just be the nutty fringe of the political spectrum.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
It's Labour's policy of increasing the number of useless, mediocre "University" courses that is increasing the number of middle class students in University. By cutting out the chaff, we will ensure that it is only the academically suitable that enter University. At the moment, many students at the weaker Universities are there simply because it is the "done thing" for middle-class kids to go to University, regardless of whether it is in their interest to do so... |
Your degree wasn't political history was it? I worked in a polytechnic from 1987 to '89. The choice of pointless courses was pretty vast then, let alone now. IIRC deciding to call polytechnics "universities" happened before 1997 as well.
I'm sure you would like to argue that Conservative policy is different now. For me political leopards rarely change their spots.
FWIW you are right that there are too many kids wasting their time in university and justifying the education industry. However the solution lies in offering alternatives - "market forces", not cutting university places. The problem is changing a culture where it is almost expected that job applicants for stacking supermarket shelves have degrees.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Very interesting thread
I think US Conservatism is more right, and therefore better than UK conservatism. I also believe however, that at this point in time it works better for the US, than it would over here.
Good points from EiF about UK Universities , Labour havent got a clue, the ease of University allows any joe bloggs to go now, and not those with Merit. Labour have messed up Education.
As for council estates, although most of my life i have lived in extremely affluent areas, since moving away from my parents i've discovered these lower-class areas (the better one's that is) are a pleasant place to live. People are friendly, they are genuine, and there are nice traditional elements to society like Butchers and stuff preserved there. The area where i live is mainly private but still lower class, it has improved my opinion on the lower-class a lot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
The solution to CAP is to make the issue non-negotiable. That's what we have a veto for. |
I think the veto can be used to make thign schange. We could and should have vetoed it at the start, but now we cannot. Indeed, the French could veto any attempt to remove it (unless I'm mistaken?) I think that's one issue we need QMV on.
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
Reform (preferably abolition) of the CAP in favour of genuine free trade has long been Tory policy. |
As it is Labour, although it is not possible without French consent (and thus heavy bribes from us) but didn't the Tory's sign it in the first place?
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
What is wrong with suggesting a "needs blind" policy - during the selection and admissions process, income of student is hidden from universities. |
  Couldn't agree more. However I thought it alkready was? I applied and got my offers before finance was discussed. That only comes about in April, way after application and most offers are given out. Income doesn't come into it in the UK.
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Those who can pay do, those who can't don't (of course on some sort of sliding scale etc). |
I would like to make sure that all can, and those that cannot afford it are given enough help so they can afford it, but those with enough pay. Kind of like the system we have currently, but with better funding and fewer students (it makes me feel so dirty agreeing with a Tory policy without caveats )
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
It's Labour's policy of increasing the number of useless, mediocre "University" courses that is increasing the number of middle class students in University. By cutting out the chaff, we will ensure that it is only the academically suitable that enter University. At the moment, many students at the weaker Universities are there simply because it is the "done thing" for middle-class kids to go to University, regardless of whether it is in their interest to do so... |

quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Maybe we should drop this idea that everyone needs to go to college; maybe it would be better to send some people to technical school where they can learn a trade. |
  
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
As for CAP:
It's not just the French who have their pork in CAP. The "veto" in CAP is political, and intertwined with budget and treaty reform issues. And you can't veto an existing policy anyway.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|