06-09-2003 20:29									#31
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

The book is subtitled "The last 13000 years of everybody"

As noted, he is a believer that New Guineians are smarter than westerners.

I liked the book very much, especially because I do not read many history books and this one exposed me to some new ideas, especially geographic determinism.

I was not convinced with his writing about animal domestication and plant domestication. It would take a whole book or two just to clarify those.

And as a rule, if TCO says something appeals to pseudo intellectuals - it is worth a read

	06-09-2003 20:30									#32
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

ah well, is there any book that includes cultural and religious influences? they can't be irrelevant.

	06-09-2003 21:04									#33
	Tired of ads?

They are in Diamonds world. Really - I'm not making it up.

	06-09-2003 21:08									#34
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

strange how the book is still so successful, can't have received a lot of scientific / academic "kudos"

	06-09-2003 21:10									#35
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Well, he does have some very good points and makes some rather convincing arguments in regards to a number of issues.

But, regardless of what his supporters say, he didn't write the end-all, be-all "there's no more to be added" book of historical development.

	06-09-2003 21:12									#36
	Suffering from ads?

what about "history of the world" by some guy in comparison to this?

I hope you know of which book I speak, the one that was mentioned in my books thread wherein you posted.

	06-09-2003 21:17									#37
	Increase the size of your Attachments

quote: Originally posted by skywalker He says there are selective pressures for intelligence among undeveloped societies, whereas there are selective pressures for resistance to disease among developed societies.

That is reasonable. But it is also reasonable that those pressures may be different in a forest/grass, hot vs cold climate, etc. And he neglects to show data to support his plausible assertion regardless. Also, he says nothing about the time scales involved. Does the last 4000 years of civilization make Western Man dumber? Or is it the 30,000 years of Ice Age foraging that mattered? Or do the last 50 years of welfare for abos, reduce their intelligence. But the big kvetch is no data. No peer-reviewed research cited. Just an assertion. He's a lightweight. For lightweights, he's heavy.

	06-09-2003 21:25									#38
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion what about "history of the world" by some guy in comparison to this? I hope you know of which book I speak, the one that was mentioned in my books thread wherein you posted.

History of the World is a much better history than GG&S. GG&S devotes its time to explaining how biological and geographical issues shaped how the various civilizations developed, and doesn't go into the development itself.

	06-09-2003 21:26									#39
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

The "guy" is J.M. Roberts. I recommend his book highly, as does Boris.

	06-09-2003 21:27									#40
	Increase Your PM Length

So HotW describes what happened and GG&S tries to explain it?

	06-09-2003 21:31									#41
	Support Apolyton

Yeah, but there's a lot of explaining in HotW. Roberts focused his explaining on cultural, religious (and yes, some geographic) issues, whereas Diamond explains it all merely as a matter of happenstance: Western Europe developed as it did not because of any inherent ability of W. Europeans nor because of any inherent "superiority" of Western ideas/beliefs, but because W. Europe is a geographically ideal place to take over the world, populated by peoples who were more disease resistant than the people they conquered from 1400-1900.

	06-09-2003 21:44									#42
	Remove this text

quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion So HotW describes what happened and GG&S tries to explain it?

HotW = History. Roberts gives a narrative-style, broad history of the entire world since the dawn of man. It isn't meant to focus on details, but it does explain why things happened in a broad sense. He talks a lot about cultural and societal progress, technology, etc.

GG&S = Sociology and Anthropology. A little history, but not real rigorous, academic history. Diamond is more focused on giving broad theories on how human cultures developed in competition with other cultures, why some societies civilized and some remained primitive, etc. Ignore the criticism here (some of it fair and some certainly not) and read it, because at the very least it will make you look at history with a new perspective.

Have you read Toynbee? If you want history, he's the man to go to.

	06-09-2003 21:49									#43
	Suffering from ads?

quote: Originally posted by JohnT nor because of any inherent "superiority" of Western ideas/beliefs,

This is a bit of a distortion, because one of the obvious things about Diamond's theory is that Western ideas/beliefs were a product of its geographical and biological situation. After all, in a confined, densely-populated region like Europe, ideas will spread much faster and evolve much quicker.

Diamond does not say, IIRC, that Western ideas/beliefs had no function whatsoever in European dominance. But they are subsidiary functions of what he emphasizes, biological and geographic factors. Ergo devoting a book to the biological and geographic makes sense, especially seeing that countless other tomes have dwelt on the ideas/beliefs angle.

	06-09-2003 21:51									#44
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

Eh. I stick to Larry Gonick if I want to be entertained by history.

	06-09-2003 21:54									#45
	Put an end to popups!

Roberts is a page-turner, IMO. I finished the entire 1100+ page book in about 2 weeks.

	06-09-2003 21:59									#46
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by TCO He claims genetic intellectual superiority of New Guineans.

I don't think so. The point he was making about the New Guineans is that intelligence is relative. The NGs developed a high level of intelligence to survive in their environment. We tend to ignore that intelligence and look upon them as undeveloped. The old ignorant savages bit.

	06-09-2003 22:02									#47
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

My major issue with Diamond is that he argues based on repetition. And that he disdains statistics or multiple regression. It's as if he wanted to prove that nutrition was the only factor affecting longevity and then told you a million stories of how starving people died (and the converse). The issue is that this does not isolate for the other variable.

(For the Texans) It's as if he wanted to prove that the passing game is the key thing that determines a football champion and gave a million examples of how good teams had a great QB and the converse. Maybe even showed a statistical correlation between good yardage gained in the air and winning (actually wait, that would involve math and be beyond him). But never showed a multiple regression to prove that rushing prowess was irrelevant. And of course, this would be leaving the defense entirely out of the question.

	06-09-2003 22:04									#48
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Be nice, math is beyond me too. I just make nice bowls in pottery...

	06-09-2003 22:08									#49
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Elok Be nice, math is beyond me too. I just make nice bowls in pottery...

That's fine. Just bow down.

	06-09-2003 22:09									#50
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Tingkai I don't think so. The point he was making about the New Guineans is that intelligence is relative. The NGs developed a high level of intelligence to survive in their environment. We tend to ignore that intelligence and look upon them as undeveloped. The old ignorant savages bit.

I quoted the man above where he says exactly that.

	06-09-2003 22:15									#51
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

dp

	06-09-2003 22:17									#52
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote: My major issue with Diamond is that he argues based on repetition. And that he disdains statistics or multiple regression. It's as if he wanted to prove that nutrition was the only factor affecting longevity and then told you a million stories of how starving people died (and the converse). The issue is that this does not isolate for the other variable.

The nature of history isn't very quantifiable. The bit on his experience on New Guineans wasn't meant to actually be part of the meat of the book (which is academically sound and as quantified as it needs to be IMO), just some personal anecdotes to show that being a hunter-gatherer doesn't prove one is less intelligent. It's pop anthropology, not an academic paper. My main problem with the book is that the quality of writing was rather bad (too much repetition, hammering in simple points, etc.).

	06-09-2003 22:25									#53
	Support Apolyton

It's a fault of logic to assume that proving one cause is significant disproves others. See the football anology, Tejas man. Or run a few multiple regressions. You don't need to do the math to understand the concept.

	06-09-2003 22:27									#54
	Inflate your Upload Space

And wrt his comment about NG being smarter than Westerners, there is nothing to stop testing on that hypothesis. Instead we have his general impression. Great. So he beleives himself. What a miracle of argument and explication.

	06-09-2003 22:28									#55
	Support Apolyton

I mean this is a case, where his assertion is amenable to testing. But he doesn't bother. He is a lightweight.

	06-09-2003 22:31									#56
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

It's meant to be anecdotal, not rigorous. That isn't what the book is about.

	06-09-2003 22:33									#57
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

GG&S is an excellent book. TCO needs to get over his "he complements the evil saavges, it must be motivated by the left blah, blah, blah."

	06-09-2003 22:38									#58
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Odin, have you even read TCO's comments? Your remarks are WAAAAAY out of line and are completely unwarranted. One expects better of you.

	06-09-2003 22:49									#59
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: Originally posted by Ramo It's meant to be anecdotal, not rigorous. That isn't what the book is about.

Don't have a problem with plausible arguments. He just overstates his thesis. Proving (giving him credit here) on factor does not disprove others. Read some books on social science. It will give you a feel for this issue. My major kvetch is not with the lack of math to prove his hyptothesis but with extending one-factor causation to negation of other factors.

Here is a good book to read through. It actually points out the limits of statisticial analysis. But not in a methof of lets throw them away. (Just like a critique of X-ray cxrystallography would not say, let's go back to pulling molecular structures out of our azz.)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...=glance&s=books

	06-09-2003 22:49									#60
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by JohnT Odin, have you even read TCO's comments? Your remarks are WAAAAAY out of line and are completely unwarranted. One expects better of you.

I am suspicious of the reasons he is dissing the book, it seems that he can't admit that us europeans are no better than anybody else. Him being a conservative and a southerner makes it seems he has an ideological bone to pick.

Oh, It was skywalker that said the book was full of PC. My response is, I DON'T THINK SO!